Weight Management Processes and Individual Differences: A Validation Study of P-Weight and S-Weight in Farsi.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zahra Gohari Dezfuli, Minoo Hasan Rashedi, Mina Araminejad, Keyvan Karimi, Ensieh Sadat Mansouri, Tohid Seif Barghi, Amir-Hossein Memari
{"title":"Weight Management Processes and Individual Differences: A Validation Study of P-Weight and S-Weight in Farsi.","authors":"Zahra Gohari Dezfuli, Minoo Hasan Rashedi, Mina Araminejad, Keyvan Karimi, Ensieh Sadat Mansouri, Tohid Seif Barghi, Amir-Hossein Memari","doi":"10.34172/aim.33513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The obesity epidemic is a growing public health concern, making weight management a crucial aspect of overall health and well-being. Indeed, effective tools to facilitate behavior change are essential for achieving long-term success in managing weight. This study aimed to validate the Farsi versions of the S-weight and P-weight questionnaires to support personalized weight management by assessing specific aspects of psychological readiness, including motivation, self-regulation, emotional reappraisal (EmR), and environmental restructuring (EnR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires was conducted. The study included 455 adults aged 17-65, excluding those undergoing invasive weight-loss interventions. The measured variables included EmR, weight consequence evaluation (WCE), weight management actions (WMA), and EnR, which were assessed using structured Likert-scale questionnaires. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, with reliability evaluated via Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaires showed strong validity and reliability (KMO=0.91; Bartlett's test χ<sup>2</sup>=3999.75; <i>P</i><0.001). Overweight and obese participants scored significantly higher in change processes than normal-weight participants (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated instruments provide a reliable means of tailoring weight management strategies based on psychological readiness, potentially improving long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55469,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","volume":"28 3","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.33513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The obesity epidemic is a growing public health concern, making weight management a crucial aspect of overall health and well-being. Indeed, effective tools to facilitate behavior change are essential for achieving long-term success in managing weight. This study aimed to validate the Farsi versions of the S-weight and P-weight questionnaires to support personalized weight management by assessing specific aspects of psychological readiness, including motivation, self-regulation, emotional reappraisal (EmR), and environmental restructuring (EnR).

Methods: A cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires was conducted. The study included 455 adults aged 17-65, excluding those undergoing invasive weight-loss interventions. The measured variables included EmR, weight consequence evaluation (WCE), weight management actions (WMA), and EnR, which were assessed using structured Likert-scale questionnaires. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, with reliability evaluated via Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results: The questionnaires showed strong validity and reliability (KMO=0.91; Bartlett's test χ2=3999.75; P<0.001). Overweight and obese participants scored significantly higher in change processes than normal-weight participants (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The validated instruments provide a reliable means of tailoring weight management strategies based on psychological readiness, potentially improving long-term outcomes.

体重管理过程和个体差异:波斯语中p -体重和s -体重的验证研究。
背景:肥胖流行病是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,使体重管理成为整体健康和福祉的关键方面。事实上,促进行为改变的有效工具对于实现长期成功的体重管理是必不可少的。本研究旨在通过评估心理准备的具体方面,包括动机、自我调节、情绪重评(EmR)和环境重构(EnR),验证波斯语版的S-weight和P-weight问卷,以支持个性化的体重管理。方法:采用自填问卷进行横断面研究。该研究包括455名年龄在17-65岁之间的成年人,不包括那些接受侵入性减肥干预的人。测量变量包括EmR、体重后果评价(WCE)、体重管理行动(WMA)和EnR,采用结构化李克特量表问卷进行评估。进行探索性和验证性因素分析,通过Cronbach's alpha和类内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。结果:问卷具有较强的效度和信度(KMO=0.91;Bartlett检验χ2=3999.75;ppp结论:经过验证的仪器提供了一种可靠的方法,可以根据心理准备来定制体重管理策略,可能改善长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Iranian Medicine
Archives of Iranian Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aim and Scope: The Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM) is a monthly peer-reviewed multidisciplinary medical publication. The journal welcomes contributions particularly relevant to the Middle-East region and publishes biomedical experiences and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases in the region as well as analyses of factors that may modulate the incidence, course, and management of diseases and pertinent medical problems. Manuscripts with didactic orientation and subjects exclusively of local interest will not be considered for publication.The 2016 Impact Factor of "Archives of Iranian Medicine" is 1.20.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信