Newborn screening programs promote vaccine acceptance among parents in Turkey: a cross-sectional study.

İzzet Erdal, Ayça Burcu Kahraman, Yılmaz Yıldız, Siddika Songül Yalçın
{"title":"Newborn screening programs promote vaccine acceptance among parents in Turkey: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"İzzet Erdal, Ayça Burcu Kahraman, Yılmaz Yıldız, Siddika Songül Yalçın","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2504866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Newborn screening and childhood immunization are among the most successful public health initiatives. Turkey has a high vaccination coverage (95-99%), but a recent decline is concerning. Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a growing global issue, identified by the WHO as a major public health threat. Given that VH may correlate with attitudes toward other health practices, we explored whether early engagement with the health system via newborn screening influences childhood vaccine acceptance. Although these programs are implemented separately but concurrently as part of the national healthcare system in Turkey, integrating newborn screening and immunization initiatives may increase vaccine uptake through early engagement and trust building. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between newborn screening and parental vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Turkey from July 2023 to April 2024. Parental VH was assessed using the PACV scale, along with questions on demographics and parental vaccination status. Participants with PACV score ≥ 50 were classified as VH+, others as VH-. Groups were compared using t-tests, Mann - Whitney U, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analytic descriptive study included 481 parents (125 with children diagnosed with biotinidase deficiency or PKU via newborn screening, and 356 with healthy children aged 2-6). The mean age of respondents was 35 years, and the majority were mothers with a college education. The main sources of vaccine information were health professionals, followed by social media and family. Overall, 19.8% of parents were vaccine-hesitant, with a lower rate in the patient group (12% vs. 22.5%). VH was higher in fathers with chronic diseases (35.1% vs 18.1%, <i>p</i> = .012) and was lower in mothers received tetanus vaccine during pregnancy (16.1% vs. 30.6%, <i>p</i> = .001) or parents who received COVID-19 vaccine (mothers: 13.9% vs. 50.6%, fathers: 14.8% vs. 49.2%, both <i>p</i> < .001). VH was lower in those consulting healthcare professionals and higher in those relying on social media or non-medical sources. Diagnosis and treatment through newborn screening had an effect of 0.47 odds on VH in the overall group (95% CI = 0.24-0.92, <i>p</i> = .028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found lower vaccine hesitancy among participants in newborn screening programs and those whose parents received adult vaccinations, potentially due to increased contact with health professionals and greater health-seeking behavior. The influence of social media on vaccine hesitancy, evident in the general population, was not observed among cases, suggesting that systematic follow-up may buffer against external risk factors. Studies with matched cohorts, real-time data collection, and anonymous surveys are needed to improve generalizability, support causal inference, and reduce biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2504866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Newborn screening and childhood immunization are among the most successful public health initiatives. Turkey has a high vaccination coverage (95-99%), but a recent decline is concerning. Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a growing global issue, identified by the WHO as a major public health threat. Given that VH may correlate with attitudes toward other health practices, we explored whether early engagement with the health system via newborn screening influences childhood vaccine acceptance. Although these programs are implemented separately but concurrently as part of the national healthcare system in Turkey, integrating newborn screening and immunization initiatives may increase vaccine uptake through early engagement and trust building. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between newborn screening and parental vaccine hesitancy.

Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Turkey from July 2023 to April 2024. Parental VH was assessed using the PACV scale, along with questions on demographics and parental vaccination status. Participants with PACV score ≥ 50 were classified as VH+, others as VH-. Groups were compared using t-tests, Mann - Whitney U, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze related factors.

Results: This analytic descriptive study included 481 parents (125 with children diagnosed with biotinidase deficiency or PKU via newborn screening, and 356 with healthy children aged 2-6). The mean age of respondents was 35 years, and the majority were mothers with a college education. The main sources of vaccine information were health professionals, followed by social media and family. Overall, 19.8% of parents were vaccine-hesitant, with a lower rate in the patient group (12% vs. 22.5%). VH was higher in fathers with chronic diseases (35.1% vs 18.1%, p = .012) and was lower in mothers received tetanus vaccine during pregnancy (16.1% vs. 30.6%, p = .001) or parents who received COVID-19 vaccine (mothers: 13.9% vs. 50.6%, fathers: 14.8% vs. 49.2%, both p < .001). VH was lower in those consulting healthcare professionals and higher in those relying on social media or non-medical sources. Diagnosis and treatment through newborn screening had an effect of 0.47 odds on VH in the overall group (95% CI = 0.24-0.92, p = .028).

Conclusion: This study found lower vaccine hesitancy among participants in newborn screening programs and those whose parents received adult vaccinations, potentially due to increased contact with health professionals and greater health-seeking behavior. The influence of social media on vaccine hesitancy, evident in the general population, was not observed among cases, suggesting that systematic follow-up may buffer against external risk factors. Studies with matched cohorts, real-time data collection, and anonymous surveys are needed to improve generalizability, support causal inference, and reduce biases.

新生儿筛查项目促进了土耳其父母对疫苗的接受:一项横断面研究。
目标:新生儿筛查和儿童免疫是最成功的公共卫生举措。土耳其的疫苗接种率很高(95-99%),但最近的下降令人担忧。疫苗犹豫(VH)是一个日益严重的全球问题,被世界卫生组织确定为一个主要的公共卫生威胁。鉴于VH可能与对其他卫生做法的态度有关,我们探讨了通过新生儿筛查早期参与卫生系统是否会影响儿童接受疫苗。虽然这些规划是单独实施的,但作为土耳其国家卫生保健系统的一部分同时实施,将新生儿筛查和免疫倡议结合起来,可以通过早期参与和建立信任来增加疫苗的吸收率。本研究旨在评估新生儿筛查与父母疫苗犹豫之间的关系。方法:本研究于2023年7月至2024年4月在土耳其的一家三级保健中心进行。使用PACV量表评估父母的VH,同时询问人口统计学和父母的疫苗接种状况。PACV评分≥50的参与者分为VH+组,其余分为VH-组。组间比较采用t检验、Mann - Whitney U检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。采用多元logistic回归分析相关因素。结果:这项描述性分析研究纳入了481名父母(125名通过新生儿筛查诊断为生物素酶缺乏症或PKU的儿童,356名2-6岁的健康儿童)。受访者的平均年龄为35岁,大多数是受过大学教育的母亲。疫苗信息的主要来源是卫生专业人员,其次是社交媒体和家庭。总体而言,19.8%的父母对疫苗犹豫不决,患者组的比例较低(12%对22.5%)。患有慢性疾病的父亲的VH较高(35.1%对18.1%,p = 0.012),而在怀孕期间接种破伤风疫苗的母亲(16.1%对30.6%,p = .001)或接种COVID-19疫苗的父母(母亲:13.9%对50.6%,父亲:14.8%对49.2%,p = 0.028)中VH较低。结论:本研究发现,在新生儿筛查项目的参与者和父母接受成人疫苗接种的参与者中,疫苗犹豫率较低,这可能是由于与卫生专业人员的接触增加和更大的求医行为。社交媒体对疫苗犹豫的影响在一般人群中很明显,但在病例中没有观察到,这表明系统的随访可以缓冲外部风险因素。需要匹配队列、实时数据收集和匿名调查的研究来提高概括性、支持因果推理和减少偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信