Diagnostic Efficacy of Prostate Biopsy by Transperineal Colour Ultrasound Plus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Oxidative Stress Injury in Patients.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Wen Li, Yumei Fan, Caiqin Li
{"title":"Diagnostic Efficacy of Prostate Biopsy by Transperineal Colour Ultrasound Plus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Oxidative Stress Injury in Patients.","authors":"Wen Li, Yumei Fan, Caiqin Li","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257803.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate biopsies using transperineal colour ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal colour ultrasound with MRI in treating prostate cancer (PCa) and oxidative stress injuries in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a backward-looking study on the medical records of 65 individuals suspected of having PCa who underwent prostate biopsies at our hospital from March 2022 to March 2024. In the transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) group, 32 patients underwent TRPB, whereas the transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) group utilised TPPB for 33 patients. Every patient received an MRI scan to verify the location of the puncture prior to it. The length of the puncture, the amount of biopsy cores collected and confirmed as positive and any negative responses postprocedure were thoroughly documented. The indices of oxidative stress injuries in both groups were assessed postpuncture, and the effectiveness levels of TPPB and TRPB in diagnosing PCa were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant statistical variance existed between the two groups in the count of biopsy and positive biopsy cores (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, compared with the duration of puncture in the TRPB group, that in the TPPB group was extended (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant variance in oxidative stress damage postpuncture existed amongst the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and the TPPB group experienced fewer negative reactions than the TRPB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In terms of diagnostic effectiveness, TPPB's sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detecting PCa stood at 84.62%, 85.00% and 84.85%, respectively, surpassing those of TRPB in Kappa value. Additionally, the overall prostate-specific antigen levels in the TPPB group's genuinely positive patients were notably less than those in the TRPB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of transperineal colour ultrasound and MRI is highly efficient in PCa diagnosis and is advised as the primary option in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 3","pages":"318-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257803.43","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate biopsies using transperineal colour ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal colour ultrasound with MRI in treating prostate cancer (PCa) and oxidative stress injuries in patients.

Methods: We conducted a backward-looking study on the medical records of 65 individuals suspected of having PCa who underwent prostate biopsies at our hospital from March 2022 to March 2024. In the transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) group, 32 patients underwent TRPB, whereas the transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) group utilised TPPB for 33 patients. Every patient received an MRI scan to verify the location of the puncture prior to it. The length of the puncture, the amount of biopsy cores collected and confirmed as positive and any negative responses postprocedure were thoroughly documented. The indices of oxidative stress injuries in both groups were assessed postpuncture, and the effectiveness levels of TPPB and TRPB in diagnosing PCa were compared.

Results: No significant statistical variance existed between the two groups in the count of biopsy and positive biopsy cores (p > 0.05). However, compared with the duration of puncture in the TRPB group, that in the TPPB group was extended (p < 0.05). No significant variance in oxidative stress damage postpuncture existed amongst the groups (p > 0.05), and the TPPB group experienced fewer negative reactions than the TRPB group (p < 0.05). In terms of diagnostic effectiveness, TPPB's sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detecting PCa stood at 84.62%, 85.00% and 84.85%, respectively, surpassing those of TRPB in Kappa value. Additionally, the overall prostate-specific antigen levels in the TPPB group's genuinely positive patients were notably less than those in the TRPB group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The combination of transperineal colour ultrasound and MRI is highly efficient in PCa diagnosis and is advised as the primary option in clinical settings.

经会阴彩超加磁共振前列腺活检对前列腺癌的诊断及氧化应激损伤分析。
目的:评价经会阴彩色超声磁共振成像(MRI)前列腺活检与经直肠彩色超声磁共振成像(MRI)对前列腺癌(PCa)和氧化应激损伤的诊断效果。方法:对2022年3月至2024年3月在我院行前列腺活检的65例疑似PCa患者的病历进行回顾性研究。在经直肠前列腺活检(TRPB)组,32例患者接受了TRPB,而经会阴前列腺活检(TPPB)组有33例患者使用了TPPB。每位患者在穿刺前都接受了核磁共振扫描以确认穿刺位置。穿刺的长度,收集并确认为阳性的活检芯的数量以及手术后的任何阴性反应都被彻底记录下来。穿刺后评估两组患者氧化应激损伤指标,比较TPPB和TRPB对PCa诊断的有效性水平。结果:两组活检针数和阳性针数差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。但与TRPB组相比,TPPB组穿刺时间延长(p < 0.05)。各组间穿刺后氧化应激损伤差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05), TPPB组出现的不良反应少于TRPB组(p < 0.05)。在诊断效能方面,TPPB检测PCa的敏感性为84.62%,特异性为85.00%,准确性为84.85%,Kappa值高于TRPB。此外,TPPB组真阳性患者的总体前列腺特异性抗原水平明显低于TRPB组(p < 0.05)。结论:经会阴彩色超声和MRI联合诊断前列腺癌是非常有效的,建议作为临床主要选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信