A core outcome set to assess chronic pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with cerebral palsy.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nadine L Smith, Noula Gibson, Christine Imms, Ashleigh L Thornton, Adrienne R Harvey
{"title":"A core outcome set to assess chronic pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Nadine L Smith, Noula Gibson, Christine Imms, Ashleigh L Thornton, Adrienne R Harvey","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To: (1) develop a core outcome set (COS) to assess chronic pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with cerebral palsy (CP) with varying communication, cognitive, and functional abilities; (2) categorize the assessment tools according to reporting method or observer-reported outcome measures; and (3) categorize the content of tools in the COS according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-stage multi-stakeholder consensus process was used: stage 1 consisted of a workshop where 42 valid and reliable assessment tools were presented to 12 clinicians and six individuals with lived experience of CP to exclude tools considered not feasible; stage 2 consisted of a 2-round Delphi survey of 85 clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of CP to gain consensus on which tools to include. Included tools were mapped to the framework of the ICF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty of 29 chronic pain assessment tools considered feasible reached 75% or greater consensus for inclusion in the COS. The tools were categorized according to reporting type: patient-reported or observer-reported; and their purpose: to identify the presence of chronic pain, to assess pain interference on activities of daily living, or to assess the impact on emotional functioning.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The developed COS guided the assessment of pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with CP with a range of communication and cognitive abilities; the COS can be used to facilitate patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To: (1) develop a core outcome set (COS) to assess chronic pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with cerebral palsy (CP) with varying communication, cognitive, and functional abilities; (2) categorize the assessment tools according to reporting method or observer-reported outcome measures; and (3) categorize the content of tools in the COS according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Method: A two-stage multi-stakeholder consensus process was used: stage 1 consisted of a workshop where 42 valid and reliable assessment tools were presented to 12 clinicians and six individuals with lived experience of CP to exclude tools considered not feasible; stage 2 consisted of a 2-round Delphi survey of 85 clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of CP to gain consensus on which tools to include. Included tools were mapped to the framework of the ICF.

Results: Twenty of 29 chronic pain assessment tools considered feasible reached 75% or greater consensus for inclusion in the COS. The tools were categorized according to reporting type: patient-reported or observer-reported; and their purpose: to identify the presence of chronic pain, to assess pain interference on activities of daily living, or to assess the impact on emotional functioning.

Interpretation: The developed COS guided the assessment of pain interference and impact on emotional functioning for children and young people with CP with a range of communication and cognitive abilities; the COS can be used to facilitate patient-centred care.

评估慢性疼痛对脑瘫儿童和青少年情绪功能的干扰和影响的核心结局。
目的:(1)建立一个核心结局集(COS)来评估慢性疼痛对具有不同沟通、认知和功能能力的脑瘫儿童和青少年(CP)情绪功能的影响;(2)根据报告方法或观察者报告的结果指标对评估工具进行分类;(3)根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)对COS中工具的内容进行分类。方法:采用两阶段的多利益相关者共识过程:第一阶段包括一个研讨会,向12名临床医生和6名有CP生活经验的个人提供42个有效可靠的评估工具,以排除被认为不可行的工具;第二阶段包括对85名临床医生、研究人员和有CP生活经验的个人进行两轮德尔菲调查,以就使用哪种工具达成共识。所包括的工具被映射到ICF的框架。结果:29种慢性疼痛评估工具中有20种被认为可行,纳入COS的共识率达到75%或更高。这些工具根据报告类型进行分类:患者报告或观察者报告;它们的目的是:识别慢性疼痛的存在,评估疼痛对日常生活活动的干扰,或评估对情绪功能的影响。解释:开发的COS可指导具有一系列沟通和认知能力的CP儿童和青少年的疼痛干扰及其对情绪功能的影响评估;COS可用于促进以病人为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信