Nonlinear Associations of Accelerometer-Based Sedentary Time With Cognitive Functions in the UK Biobank.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Silvio Maltagliati, Daniel H Aslan, M Katherine Sayre, Pradyumna K Bharadwaj, Madeline Ally, Mark H C Lai, Rand R Wilcox, Yann C Klimentidis, Gene E Alexander, David A Raichlen
{"title":"Nonlinear Associations of Accelerometer-Based Sedentary Time With Cognitive Functions in the UK Biobank.","authors":"Silvio Maltagliati, Daniel H Aslan, M Katherine Sayre, Pradyumna K Bharadwaj, Madeline Ally, Mark H C Lai, Rand R Wilcox, Yann C Klimentidis, Gene E Alexander, David A Raichlen","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Device-based sedentary time shows a nonlinear association with incident dementia among older adults. However, associations between sedentary time and cognitive performance have been inconsistent. We examined potential nonlinear associations between sedentary time and performance on cognitive tests among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the UK Biobank and included 32,875 adults aged 60-79. Sedentary time was estimated from a machine learning-based analysis of 1 week of wrist-worn accelerometer data. The primary outcomes were performance on 6 cognitive tests completed online (fluid intelligence test, short-term numeric memory test, symbol substitution test, visual-spatial memory test, alphanumeric, and numeric trail making tests), as well as a composite cognitive score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for the visual-spatial memory test, nonlinear approaches provided a better fit than linear methods to model the associations of sedentary time with other cognitive outcomes. For these outcomes, segmented regression models showed that, although effect sizes were small, higher sedentary time was associated with better cognitive performance up to a threshold of sedentary time that varied from 9.7 to 12.3 hr per day. Above this threshold, the association between sedentary time and cognitive performance was attenuated toward the null or became negative (for the symbol substitution test only).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As accounted by our nonlinear approach, the association between sedentary time and cognitive performance may shift from positive to null or negative above a 10-12-hr threshold among older adults. A combination of device-based and self-report assessments of sedentary behavior is needed to better understand these nonlinear associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Device-based sedentary time shows a nonlinear association with incident dementia among older adults. However, associations between sedentary time and cognitive performance have been inconsistent. We examined potential nonlinear associations between sedentary time and performance on cognitive tests among older adults.

Methods: We used data from the UK Biobank and included 32,875 adults aged 60-79. Sedentary time was estimated from a machine learning-based analysis of 1 week of wrist-worn accelerometer data. The primary outcomes were performance on 6 cognitive tests completed online (fluid intelligence test, short-term numeric memory test, symbol substitution test, visual-spatial memory test, alphanumeric, and numeric trail making tests), as well as a composite cognitive score.

Results: Except for the visual-spatial memory test, nonlinear approaches provided a better fit than linear methods to model the associations of sedentary time with other cognitive outcomes. For these outcomes, segmented regression models showed that, although effect sizes were small, higher sedentary time was associated with better cognitive performance up to a threshold of sedentary time that varied from 9.7 to 12.3 hr per day. Above this threshold, the association between sedentary time and cognitive performance was attenuated toward the null or became negative (for the symbol substitution test only).

Discussion: As accounted by our nonlinear approach, the association between sedentary time and cognitive performance may shift from positive to null or negative above a 10-12-hr threshold among older adults. A combination of device-based and self-report assessments of sedentary behavior is needed to better understand these nonlinear associations.

英国生物银行基于加速度计的久坐时间与认知功能的非线性关联。
目的:在老年人中,基于设备的久坐时间与痴呆发生率呈非线性关联。然而,久坐时间和认知能力之间的联系并不一致。我们研究了久坐时间与老年人认知测试表现之间潜在的非线性关联。方法:我们使用来自英国生物银行的数据,包括32,875名年龄在60-79岁之间的成年人。久坐时间是通过对一周腕上加速度计数据的机器学习分析估计出来的。主要结果是在线完成的六项认知测试(流体智力测试、短期数字记忆测试、符号替代测试、视觉空间记忆测试、字母数字和数字轨迹制作测试)的表现,以及综合认知得分。结果:除了视觉空间记忆测试外,非线性方法比线性方法更适合于模拟久坐时间与其他认知结果的关联。对于这些结果,分段回归模型显示,尽管效应量很小,但久坐时间越长,认知能力越好,直到每天久坐时间的阈值从9.7小时到12.3小时不等。超过这个阈值,久坐时间和认知表现之间的关联减弱到零,或变为负相关(仅用于符号替换测试)。讨论:根据我们的非线性方法,在老年人中,久坐时间和认知能力之间的联系可能在10-12小时阈值以上从正变为零或负。为了更好地理解这些非线性关联,需要结合基于设备和自我报告的久坐行为评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信