Efficacy of Adjunctive Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sachin Reddy, Nishant Goyal, Umesh Shreekantiah
{"title":"Efficacy of Adjunctive Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study.","authors":"Sachin Reddy, Nishant Goyal, Umesh Shreekantiah","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder is one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders with a higher lifetime prevalence than schizophrenia, often showing inadequate response to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of adjunctive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in a randomized, sham-controlled set-up, addressing inadequate response to standard treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine obsessive-compulsive disorder patients were randomly allocated to receive either high-frequency dTMS (20 Hz) or sham stimulation and received 10 sessions of treatment using the H7 coil to target the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex over a period of 2 weeks. Change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores was the primary outcome measure. Secondary efficacy measures were changes in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores and response rates as measured by Y-BOCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The active dTMS group demonstrated a significant reduction in Y-BOCS scores compared with sham (-10.4 vs -2.6 points; P < 0.001), with an effect size of 1.39. Full response rates were 75% in the active group versus 5% in the sham group (P < 0.001). Anxiety and depressive symptoms also improved significantly in the active group (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale: -9.1 vs -2.4 points, P < 0.001; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -5.9 vs -1.8 points, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that dTMS targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex significantly improved obsessive-compulsive, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, with faster response rates and fewer sessions compared with previous trials, suggesting that dTMS may serve as an effective early intervention for a wider range of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders with a higher lifetime prevalence than schizophrenia, often showing inadequate response to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of adjunctive deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in a randomized, sham-controlled set-up, addressing inadequate response to standard treatments.

Methods: Forty-nine obsessive-compulsive disorder patients were randomly allocated to receive either high-frequency dTMS (20 Hz) or sham stimulation and received 10 sessions of treatment using the H7 coil to target the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex over a period of 2 weeks. Change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores was the primary outcome measure. Secondary efficacy measures were changes in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores and response rates as measured by Y-BOCS.

Results: The active dTMS group demonstrated a significant reduction in Y-BOCS scores compared with sham (-10.4 vs -2.6 points; P < 0.001), with an effect size of 1.39. Full response rates were 75% in the active group versus 5% in the sham group (P < 0.001). Anxiety and depressive symptoms also improved significantly in the active group (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale: -9.1 vs -2.4 points, P < 0.001; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -5.9 vs -1.8 points, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that dTMS targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex significantly improved obsessive-compulsive, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, with faster response rates and fewer sessions compared with previous trials, suggesting that dTMS may serve as an effective early intervention for a wider range of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.

辅助深经颅磁刺激治疗强迫症的疗效:一项随机假对照研究。
目的:强迫症是最常见的神经精神疾病之一,其终生患病率高于精神分裂症,通常对药物和心理治疗反应不足。本研究旨在检验辅助深经颅磁刺激(dTMS)在随机、假对照设置中的疗效,以解决对标准治疗反应不足的问题。方法:将49例强迫症患者随机分为高频dTMS (20 Hz)组和假刺激组,分别用H7线圈针对扣带前皮层背侧和前额叶内侧皮质进行10次治疗,为期2周。耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)得分的变化是主要的结果测量指标。次要疗效测量是汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表得分的变化以及Y-BOCS测量的反应率。结果:与假手术组相比,活动dTMS组Y-BOCS评分显著降低(-10.4分vs -2.6分;P < 0.001),效应量为1.39。治疗组的完全缓解率为75%,而假手术组为5% (P < 0.001)。积极组的焦虑和抑郁症状也显著改善(汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表:-9.1分vs -2.4分,P < 0.001;汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表:-5.9分vs -1.8分,P < 0.001)。结论:我们的研究表明,与以往的试验相比,针对背前扣带皮层和内侧前额叶皮层的dTMS可显著改善强迫症、焦虑和抑郁症状,反应率更快,治疗次数更少,这表明dTMS可作为一种有效的早期干预方法,适用于更大范围的强迫症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信