Trends in computed tomography utilization among emergency department patients with foot and ankle trauma.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Soham Ghoshal, Alexander H King, Michael Pang, C Michael Hood, Aaron D Sodickson, Michael S Gee, Michael H Lev, Mitchel B Harris, Marc D Succi
{"title":"Trends in computed tomography utilization among emergency department patients with foot and ankle trauma.","authors":"Soham Ghoshal, Alexander H King, Michael Pang, C Michael Hood, Aaron D Sodickson, Michael S Gee, Michael H Lev, Mitchel B Harris, Marc D Succi","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the number of foot/ankle computed tomography (CT) exams ordered per encounter for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with foot and ankle trauma over a 5-year period. Secondary aims included evaluating the positivity rate of foot/ankle CT exams and identifying factors associated with receiving a CT foot/ankle. This retrospective study analyzed data from a large urban Level-1 trauma center between 2016 and 2021. Patients were identified by charted chief complaints related to foot and ankle trauma. The primary outcome was the number of CT foot/ankle exams ordered per patient in a given period. A univariate chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in patient presentations and imaging rates across the study period. Over the 5-year span, there were 9,845 patient encounters, with a significant increase in CT foot/ankle orders from 2.4 % to 6.6 % (p < 0.001). The CT positivity rate, defined as CTs with positive findings, declined from 95.2 % in 2016 to 84.1 % in 2021 (p < 0.001). Black patients had lower odds of receiving CT scans compared to White patients, as did Medicare recipients compared to Medicaid recipients (p < 0.001). Factors such as age (OR: 1.02 per year), year of visit (OR: 2.66 for 2021), time of day (OR: 1.62 for evening arrivals), and arrival by EMS (OR: 5.60) were significantly associated with higher CT order rates. This study highlights a marked increase in CT utilization for foot and ankle trauma with a corresponding decline in the rate of positive findings. Further research is necessary to explore the reasons behind this trend and to identify potential workflow or protocol adjustments to improve imaging efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.04.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the number of foot/ankle computed tomography (CT) exams ordered per encounter for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with foot and ankle trauma over a 5-year period. Secondary aims included evaluating the positivity rate of foot/ankle CT exams and identifying factors associated with receiving a CT foot/ankle. This retrospective study analyzed data from a large urban Level-1 trauma center between 2016 and 2021. Patients were identified by charted chief complaints related to foot and ankle trauma. The primary outcome was the number of CT foot/ankle exams ordered per patient in a given period. A univariate chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in patient presentations and imaging rates across the study period. Over the 5-year span, there were 9,845 patient encounters, with a significant increase in CT foot/ankle orders from 2.4 % to 6.6 % (p < 0.001). The CT positivity rate, defined as CTs with positive findings, declined from 95.2 % in 2016 to 84.1 % in 2021 (p < 0.001). Black patients had lower odds of receiving CT scans compared to White patients, as did Medicare recipients compared to Medicaid recipients (p < 0.001). Factors such as age (OR: 1.02 per year), year of visit (OR: 2.66 for 2021), time of day (OR: 1.62 for evening arrivals), and arrival by EMS (OR: 5.60) were significantly associated with higher CT order rates. This study highlights a marked increase in CT utilization for foot and ankle trauma with a corresponding decline in the rate of positive findings. Further research is necessary to explore the reasons behind this trend and to identify potential workflow or protocol adjustments to improve imaging efficacy.

急诊科足部和踝关节创伤患者计算机断层扫描应用趋势。
本研究的目的是评估5年期间因足部和踝关节创伤就诊的急诊科(ED)患者每次就诊的足部/踝关节计算机断层扫描(CT)检查次数。次要目的包括评估足部/踝关节CT检查的阳性率,并确定与接受足部/踝关节CT检查相关的因素。这项回顾性研究分析了2016年至2021年间一家大型城市一级创伤中心的数据。通过与足部和踝关节创伤相关的主诉来确定患者。主要结果是在给定时间内每位患者要求进行足部/踝关节CT检查的次数。采用单变量卡方分析来评估整个研究期间患者表现和显像率的差异。在5年的时间里,有9845例患者就诊,CT足/踝关节诊断率从2.4%显著增加到6.6% (p < 0.001)。CT阳性率(定义为CT阳性结果)从2016年的95.2%下降到2021年的84.1% (p < 0.001)。与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受CT扫描的几率较低,医疗保险接受者与医疗补助接受者相比也是如此(p < 0.001)。年龄(OR: 1.02 /年)、就诊年份(OR: 2.66 / 2021)、就诊时间(OR: 1.62 /晚上)和EMS到达(OR: 5.60)等因素与较高的CT订单率显著相关。这项研究强调了CT在足部和踝关节创伤中的应用显著增加,而相应的阳性发现率下降。有必要进一步研究这一趋势背后的原因,并确定潜在的工作流程或协议调整,以提高成像效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信