An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Dominic Guitard, Jean Saint-Aubin, J Nick Reid, Randall K Jamieson
{"title":"An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions.","authors":"Dominic Guitard, Jean Saint-Aubin, J Nick Reid, Randall K Jamieson","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02669-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human memory is reconstructive and thus fundamentally imperfect. One of its critical flaws is false recall-the erroneous recollection of unstudied items. Despite its significant implications, false recall poses a challenge for existing computational models of serial recall, which struggle to provide item-specific predictions. Across six experiments, each involving 100 young adults, we address this issue using the Embedded Computational Framework of Memory (eCFM) that integrates existing accounts of semantic and episodic memory. While the framework provides a comprehensive account of memory processing, its innovation lies in the inclusion of a comprehensive lexicon of word knowledge derived from distributional semantic models. By integrating a lexicon that captures orthographic, phonological, and semantic relationships within an episodic memory model, the eCFM successfully accounts for patterns of veridical serial recall (e.g., proportion correct, intralist errors, omissions) while also capturing false recall (e.g., extralist errors including both critical lures and non-critical lures). We demonstrate the model's capabilities through simulations applied to six experiments, with lists of words (Experiments 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) and non-words (Experiments 3A and 3B) that are either related or unrelated semantically (Experiments 1A and 1B), phonologically (Experiments 2A and 2B), or orthographically (Experiments 3A and 3B). This approach fills a computational gap in modelling serial recall and underscores the importance of integrating traditionally separate areas of semantic and episodic memory to provide more precise predictions and holistic memory models.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02669-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human memory is reconstructive and thus fundamentally imperfect. One of its critical flaws is false recall-the erroneous recollection of unstudied items. Despite its significant implications, false recall poses a challenge for existing computational models of serial recall, which struggle to provide item-specific predictions. Across six experiments, each involving 100 young adults, we address this issue using the Embedded Computational Framework of Memory (eCFM) that integrates existing accounts of semantic and episodic memory. While the framework provides a comprehensive account of memory processing, its innovation lies in the inclusion of a comprehensive lexicon of word knowledge derived from distributional semantic models. By integrating a lexicon that captures orthographic, phonological, and semantic relationships within an episodic memory model, the eCFM successfully accounts for patterns of veridical serial recall (e.g., proportion correct, intralist errors, omissions) while also capturing false recall (e.g., extralist errors including both critical lures and non-critical lures). We demonstrate the model's capabilities through simulations applied to six experiments, with lists of words (Experiments 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) and non-words (Experiments 3A and 3B) that are either related or unrelated semantically (Experiments 1A and 1B), phonologically (Experiments 2A and 2B), or orthographically (Experiments 3A and 3B). This approach fills a computational gap in modelling serial recall and underscores the importance of integrating traditionally separate areas of semantic and episodic memory to provide more precise predictions and holistic memory models.

记忆的嵌入式计算框架:表征在真实和错误回忆预测中的关键作用。
人类的记忆是重建性的,因此从根本上来说是不完美的。它的一个关键缺陷是错误回忆——对未研究过的项目的错误回忆。尽管错误回忆具有重要意义,但它对现有的串行回忆计算模型提出了挑战,这些模型难以提供特定项目的预测。在六个实验中,每个实验涉及100名年轻人,我们使用嵌入式记忆计算框架(eCFM)来解决这个问题,该框架整合了现有的语义记忆和情景记忆。虽然该框架提供了对记忆处理的全面描述,但其创新之处在于包含了从分布式语义模型派生的单词知识的综合词典。通过在情景记忆模型中整合一个能够捕捉正字法、语音和语义关系的词汇,eCFM成功地解释了真实连续回忆的模式(例如,比例正确、内部错误、遗漏),同时也捕捉了错误回忆(例如,包括关键诱饵和非关键诱饵在内的外部错误)。我们通过应用于六个实验的模拟来展示该模型的功能,这些实验包括单词列表(实验1A、1B、2A和2B)和非单词列表(实验3A和3B),这些单词在语义上(实验1A和1B)、语音上(实验2A和2B)或拼写上(实验3A和3B)相关或不相关。这种方法填补了序列回忆建模的计算空白,强调了整合传统上独立的语义记忆和情景记忆区域的重要性,以提供更精确的预测和整体记忆模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信