Treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Military Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jenny J W Liu, Anthony Nazarov, Natalie Ein, Bethany Easterbrook, Tri Le, Clara Baker, Julia Gervasio, Edouard Auger, Ken Balderson, Mathieu Bilodeau, Amer M Burhan, Murray W Enns, Fardous Hosseiny, Vicky Lavoie, Natalie Mota, Maya L Roth, Sonya G Wanklyn, J Don Richardson
{"title":"Treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Military Populations: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jenny J W Liu, Anthony Nazarov, Natalie Ein, Bethany Easterbrook, Tri Le, Clara Baker, Julia Gervasio, Edouard Auger, Ken Balderson, Mathieu Bilodeau, Amer M Burhan, Murray W Enns, Fardous Hosseiny, Vicky Lavoie, Natalie Mota, Maya L Roth, Sonya G Wanklyn, J Don Richardson","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24r15571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Military and Veteran populations experience higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared to civilians. While trauma focused psychotherapies are generally recommended as first-line treatments, the effectiveness of various treatments in military populations requires further investigation.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the current literature regarding effectiveness of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies, and combination treatments for PTSD in military populations.</p><p><p><b>Data Sources:</b> This preregistered review (PROSPERO: CRD42021245754) was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses and Cochrane guidelines. A search was conducted using PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.</p><p><p><b>Study Selection:</b> The final sample included data from 414 studies.</p><p><p><b>Data Extraction:</b> Full study methodologies can be found in the published protocol (Liu et al, 2021).</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The pooled random-effects model found effect size across all PTSD treatments (<i>k</i> = 712) was <i>g</i>=0.96, compared to <i>g</i>=0.45 for control conditions (<i>k</i> = 122). Clinician administered measures indicated larger treatment effects (<i>g</i>= 1.02) than self reported measures (<i>g</i> =0.82). Combination therapies yielded the largest effects (<i>g</i> =2.17), outperforming both psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies alone. No significant differences were found across control conditions.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Findings suggest that integrating psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies may address multiple dimensions of PTSD more effectively than monotherapies. However, these results contrast with the prioritization of trauma-informed psychotherapies over pharmacotherapies, as recommended by the 2023 US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense guidelines. Future research should focus on subclass analyses and long-term outcomes to refine treatment strategies for PTSD in military populations. Tailoring treatment plans to individual needs remains crucial for optimizing recovery and long-term symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24r15571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Military and Veteran populations experience higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared to civilians. While trauma focused psychotherapies are generally recommended as first-line treatments, the effectiveness of various treatments in military populations requires further investigation.

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the current literature regarding effectiveness of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies, and combination treatments for PTSD in military populations.

Data Sources: This preregistered review (PROSPERO: CRD42021245754) was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses and Cochrane guidelines. A search was conducted using PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Study Selection: The final sample included data from 414 studies.

Data Extraction: Full study methodologies can be found in the published protocol (Liu et al, 2021).

Results: The pooled random-effects model found effect size across all PTSD treatments (k = 712) was g=0.96, compared to g=0.45 for control conditions (k = 122). Clinician administered measures indicated larger treatment effects (g= 1.02) than self reported measures (g =0.82). Combination therapies yielded the largest effects (g =2.17), outperforming both psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies alone. No significant differences were found across control conditions.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that integrating psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies may address multiple dimensions of PTSD more effectively than monotherapies. However, these results contrast with the prioritization of trauma-informed psychotherapies over pharmacotherapies, as recommended by the 2023 US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense guidelines. Future research should focus on subclass analyses and long-term outcomes to refine treatment strategies for PTSD in military populations. Tailoring treatment plans to individual needs remains crucial for optimizing recovery and long-term symptom management.

军人创伤后应激障碍的治疗:一项荟萃分析。
背景:与平民相比,军人和退伍军人的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)发病率更高。虽然以创伤为重点的心理治疗通常被推荐为一线治疗方法,但各种治疗方法在军人群体中的有效性需要进一步研究。目的:本荟萃分析旨在综合目前有关军人PTSD心理治疗、药物治疗和联合治疗效果的文献。数据来源:本预注册综述(PROSPERO: CRD42021245754)按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目和Cochrane指南进行。使用PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL和ProQuest进行检索。研究选择:最终样本包括来自414项研究的数据。数据提取:完整的研究方法可在已发表的方案中找到(Liu et al ., 2021)。结果:合并随机效应模型发现,所有PTSD治疗(k = 712)的效应大小为g=0.96,而对照组(k = 122)的效应大小为g=0.45。临床医生给药的治疗效果(g= 1.02)大于自我报告的治疗效果(g= 0.82)。联合治疗的效果最大(g =2.17),优于单独的心理治疗和药物治疗。在不同的控制条件下没有发现显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,心理治疗和药物治疗相结合可能比单一治疗更有效地解决创伤后应激障碍的多个维度。然而,这些结果与2023年美国退伍军人事务部/国防部指南建议的创伤知情心理治疗优先于药物治疗形成对比。未来的研究应侧重于亚类分析和长期结果,以完善军人创伤后应激障碍的治疗策略。定制治疗计划,以个人需要仍然是关键优化恢复和长期症状管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信