Image quality in diagnostic radiology: a guide to methodologies for radiologists.

Q3 Medicine
Radiologia Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0088-en
Andréa de Lima Bastos, Maria do Socorro Nogueira
{"title":"Image quality in diagnostic radiology: a guide to methodologies for radiologists.","authors":"Andréa de Lima Bastos, Maria do Socorro Nogueira","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0088-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive guide to image quality assessment in diagnostic radiology, emphasizing practical methodologies for radiologists. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care on the basis of the understanding and application of quantitative and qualitative metrics in clinical practice and research. We conducted a review of the literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The search terms included \"image quality in radiology\", \"quantitative and qualitative assessment\", \"modulation transfer function\", \"signal-to-noise ratio\", \"contrast-to-noise ratio\", \"radiation dose optimization\", and \"artificial intelligence in image quality assessment\". The review identified the main methodologies for image quality assessment. We analyzed these metrics for their applicability in clinical settings, highlighting their benefits and limitations. In addition, we discuss qualitative methods such as visual assessment, the assessment of contrast/density, and peer review. This guide fills a gap in the literature by providing accessible, practical knowledge for general radiologists. Ongoing research, education, and technological development are essential to advance the field and ensure high standards in radiology practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20240088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0088-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive guide to image quality assessment in diagnostic radiology, emphasizing practical methodologies for radiologists. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care on the basis of the understanding and application of quantitative and qualitative metrics in clinical practice and research. We conducted a review of the literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The search terms included "image quality in radiology", "quantitative and qualitative assessment", "modulation transfer function", "signal-to-noise ratio", "contrast-to-noise ratio", "radiation dose optimization", and "artificial intelligence in image quality assessment". The review identified the main methodologies for image quality assessment. We analyzed these metrics for their applicability in clinical settings, highlighting their benefits and limitations. In addition, we discuss qualitative methods such as visual assessment, the assessment of contrast/density, and peer review. This guide fills a gap in the literature by providing accessible, practical knowledge for general radiologists. Ongoing research, education, and technological development are essential to advance the field and ensure high standards in radiology practice.

诊断放射学中的图像质量:放射学家方法论指南。
本文的目的是提供一个全面的指导图像质量评估诊断放射学,强调实用的方法为放射科医生。目标是在临床实践和研究中对定量和定性指标的理解和应用的基础上提高诊断准确性和患者护理。我们对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase数据库中的文献进行了回顾。检索词包括“放射学中的图像质量”、“定量与定性评估”、“调制传递函数”、“信噪比”、“对比噪声比”、“辐射剂量优化”、“图像质量评估中的人工智能”。这篇综述确定了图像质量评估的主要方法。我们分析了这些指标在临床环境中的适用性,强调了它们的优点和局限性。此外,我们还讨论了定性方法,如视觉评估、对比/密度评估和同行评议。本指南填补了空白,在文献提供方便,实用的知识,一般放射科医生。持续的研究、教育和技术发展对于推进该领域和确保放射学实践的高标准至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信