Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurement Post-Pneumatic Dilation in Clinically Relevant Esophagogastric Junction Outlet Obstruction.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1111/nmo.70053
James D Miller, Zachary L Mitchell, Abigail L Ellington, Felicia A Peoples, Steven B Clayton
{"title":"Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurement Post-Pneumatic Dilation in Clinically Relevant Esophagogastric Junction Outlet Obstruction.","authors":"James D Miller, Zachary L Mitchell, Abigail L Ellington, Felicia A Peoples, Steven B Clayton","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumatic dilation (PD) is an effective treatment for disorders of reduced esophageal opening. Functional lumen impedance planimetry (FLIP) can effectively measure lower esophageal sphincter (LES) physiology compared to esophageal standards. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to evaluate if FLIP measurements and esophageal opening classifications changed consistently with symptom improvement post-PD. Also, the aim was to determine if post-PD FLIP measurement correlated with the need for repeat dilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with clinically significant esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) with reduced esophageal opening (REO) or borderline REO (BrEO) based on FLIP, timed barium esophagram (TBE), and manometry who underwent PD were included. Post-PD FLIP measurements were taken immediately after PD during the same endoscopy encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PD, average distensibility index (DI) increased from 1.5 mm<sup>2</sup>/mmHg to 4.7 mm<sup>2</sup>/mmHg (p < 0.001) and diameter changed from 8.9 mm to 15.9 mm (p < 0.001). Average post-dilation Eckardt score was 1.2, decreasing from an average pre-dilation score of 6.25. Of those requiring repeat dilations, average post-dilation DI was 4.5 mm<sup>2</sup>/mmHg and diameter 16.4 mm, not statistically different from those that did not undergo repeat procedure (p = 0.79, 0.67, respectively). Post-dilation esophageal openings were all NEO or BnEO. Average Eckardt score at 6-8 week follow-up was not significantly different from those who did not require repeat dilation (1.4, p = 0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PD appears to be associated with improved esophageal opening and a significant change in both DI and diameter, consistent with an improved Eckardt score. Post-dilation DI, diameter, esophageal opening pattern, and Eckardt score did not reveal a trend indicating the need for repeat dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is an effective treatment for disorders of reduced esophageal opening. Functional lumen impedance planimetry (FLIP) can effectively measure lower esophageal sphincter (LES) physiology compared to esophageal standards. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to evaluate if FLIP measurements and esophageal opening classifications changed consistently with symptom improvement post-PD. Also, the aim was to determine if post-PD FLIP measurement correlated with the need for repeat dilation.

Methods: Patients with clinically significant esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) with reduced esophageal opening (REO) or borderline REO (BrEO) based on FLIP, timed barium esophagram (TBE), and manometry who underwent PD were included. Post-PD FLIP measurements were taken immediately after PD during the same endoscopy encounter.

Results: After PD, average distensibility index (DI) increased from 1.5 mm2/mmHg to 4.7 mm2/mmHg (p < 0.001) and diameter changed from 8.9 mm to 15.9 mm (p < 0.001). Average post-dilation Eckardt score was 1.2, decreasing from an average pre-dilation score of 6.25. Of those requiring repeat dilations, average post-dilation DI was 4.5 mm2/mmHg and diameter 16.4 mm, not statistically different from those that did not undergo repeat procedure (p = 0.79, 0.67, respectively). Post-dilation esophageal openings were all NEO or BnEO. Average Eckardt score at 6-8 week follow-up was not significantly different from those who did not require repeat dilation (1.4, p = 0.112).

Conclusions: PD appears to be associated with improved esophageal opening and a significant change in both DI and diameter, consistent with an improved Eckardt score. Post-dilation DI, diameter, esophageal opening pattern, and Eckardt score did not reveal a trend indicating the need for repeat dilation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

功能性管腔成像探头测量与食管胃交界出口梗阻临床相关的气动扩张。
背景:气动扩张术(PD)是治疗食管开口缩小障碍的有效方法。与食管标准相比,功能性管腔阻抗平面测量法(FLIP)可以有效地测量食管下括约肌(LES)的生理机能。这项回顾性队列分析的目的是评估FLIP测量和食管开口分类是否随着pd后症状的改善而改变。此外,目的是确定pd后FLIP测量是否与重复扩张的需要相关。方法:纳入有临床意义的食管胃交界出口梗阻(EGJOO)伴食管开口减小(REO)或边缘性REO (BrEO)的患者,基于FLIP、定时食管钡餐造影(TBE)和测压,行PD。PD后的FLIP测量是在PD后立即进行的。结果:PD后,平均扩张指数(DI)从1.5 mm2/mmHg增加到4.7 mm2/mmHg (p 2/mmHg和直径16.4 mm),与未接受重复手术的患者无统计学差异(p分别= 0.79、0.67)。扩张后食管开口均为NEO或BnEO。6-8周随访时的平均Eckardt评分与不需要重复扩张术的患者无显著差异(1.4,p = 0.112)。结论:PD似乎与食管开口改善以及DI和直径的显著变化有关,与Eckardt评分的改善相一致。扩张后DI、内径、食管开口模式和Eckardt评分没有显示需要重复扩张的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信