Abdominal cancer pain admission in emergency department vs. oncology emergency department.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2025.2491296
Kristina Zaslavsky, Ofir Morag, Menucha Jurkowicz, Galia Pesah, Michelle Nigri Levitan, Itay Goor-Aryeh
{"title":"Abdominal cancer pain admission in emergency department vs. oncology emergency department.","authors":"Kristina Zaslavsky, Ofir Morag, Menucha Jurkowicz, Galia Pesah, Michelle Nigri Levitan, Itay Goor-Aryeh","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2491296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the rates of hospitalization, opioid prescription, supportive care, hospice referral, and 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with metastatic cancer and abdominal pain admitted to either the Emergency Department (ED) or the Oncology ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic cancer and abdominal pain admitted to the ED or Oncology ED at a tertiary medical center between June 2020 and May 2022. The MDClone ADAMS Platform, a healthcare data analytics environment, was used for data collection. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) based on propensity scoring was used to balance and compare characteristics of patient groups admitted to both ED settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weighted multivariable logistic regression found that metastatic cancer patients with abdominal pain complaints visiting the Oncology ED were 66% less likely to be admitted to the hospital (OR 0.34, 95% CI [0.16, 0.72], p-value = 0.005), and more likely to receive a supportive care consultation (OR 4.67, 95% CI [1.45, 15.05], p-value = 0.010), compared with the ED. Our study found that an Oncology ED, due to its expertise and immediate access to supportive care services due to their physical location within the same facility, enables prompt intervention for symptom management and psychosocial support, besides providing further oncology outpatient clinics follow-up for patients with metastatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe that a developed oncology emergency care with specialized staff has the potential to reduce hospitalization rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"294-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2491296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the rates of hospitalization, opioid prescription, supportive care, hospice referral, and 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with metastatic cancer and abdominal pain admitted to either the Emergency Department (ED) or the Oncology ED.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic cancer and abdominal pain admitted to the ED or Oncology ED at a tertiary medical center between June 2020 and May 2022. The MDClone ADAMS Platform, a healthcare data analytics environment, was used for data collection. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) based on propensity scoring was used to balance and compare characteristics of patient groups admitted to both ED settings.

Results: Weighted multivariable logistic regression found that metastatic cancer patients with abdominal pain complaints visiting the Oncology ED were 66% less likely to be admitted to the hospital (OR 0.34, 95% CI [0.16, 0.72], p-value = 0.005), and more likely to receive a supportive care consultation (OR 4.67, 95% CI [1.45, 15.05], p-value = 0.010), compared with the ED. Our study found that an Oncology ED, due to its expertise and immediate access to supportive care services due to their physical location within the same facility, enables prompt intervention for symptom management and psychosocial support, besides providing further oncology outpatient clinics follow-up for patients with metastatic cancer.

Conclusions: We believe that a developed oncology emergency care with specialized staff has the potential to reduce hospitalization rates.

急诊科与肿瘤急诊科腹部肿瘤疼痛住院比较
目的:调查急诊科(ED)或肿瘤科ED收治的转移性癌症和腹痛患者的住院率、阿片类药物处方率、支持性护理率、临终关怀转诊率和30天全因死亡率。方法:我们对2020年6月至2022年5月在三级医疗中心ED或肿瘤科ED收治的转移性癌症和腹痛患者进行了回顾性队列研究。数据收集使用了医疗保健数据分析环境MDClone ADAMS平台。使用基于倾向评分的逆概率加权(IPW)来平衡和比较两种急诊科收治的患者组的特征。结果:加权多变量logistic回归发现,与急诊科相比,以腹痛为主诉前往肿瘤科急诊科就诊的转移性癌症患者入院的可能性要低66% (OR 0.34, 95% CI [0.16, 0.72], p值= 0.005),接受支持性护理咨询的可能性要高66% (OR 4.67, 95% CI [1.45, 15.05], p值= 0.010)。由于其在同一设施内的物理位置,其专业知识和可立即获得支持性护理服务,除了为转移性癌症患者提供进一步的肿瘤门诊随访外,还可以对症状管理和社会心理支持进行及时干预。结论:我们认为,一个发达的肿瘤急诊护理和专业人员有可能降低住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信