[Efficacy of total crown and porcelain inlay restoration and its effect on masticatory ability and gingival condition].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2025-02-01
Mian Wang, Ying Hou, Fei-Fei Tian, Dan-Jie Meng, Shuang Han
{"title":"[Efficacy of total crown and porcelain inlay restoration and its effect on masticatory ability and gingival condition].","authors":"Mian Wang, Ying Hou, Fei-Fei Tian, Dan-Jie Meng, Shuang Han","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of full crown and porcelain inlay in the treatment of cracked teeth after root canal treatment and repair and its effect on chewing ability and gingival status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted to select 106 patients with cracked teeth who underwent root canal treatment from December 2020 to December 2023, divided into experimental group and control group according to the random number table method, with 53 cases in each group. The clinical effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were counted and compared. The pain levels [visual analogue scale (VAS)] of the two groups before treatment,1 st, 3 rd and 7 th day after treatment were compared. The gingival conditions [plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), gingival bleeding index (BI) and periodontal pocket depth (PD)] were compared between the two groups before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. The chewing ability (bite force, chewing efficiency) of the two groups before treatment, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of follow-up were compared.Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 25.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The good rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the total incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). At the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after treatment, VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment. The experimental group[(4.43±0.68), (3.15±0.63) and (2.04±0.51) points] were significantly lower than the control group[(4.86±0.57), (3.81±0.67) and (2.86±0.52) points], all showed a downward trend (P<0.05). At 6 months of follow-up, BI and PD in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, GI and PLI were lower than those before treatment. GI, PLI, BI and PD in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). After 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up, the masticatory efficiency and bite force of the two groups were higher than those before treatment. The masticatory efficiency of the experimental group was (70.25±5.57)%, (85.36±6.74)% and (92.57±6.35)%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group[(62.35±5.44)%, (73.57±6.32)% and (84.26±6.22)%]. The bite force in the experimental group[(112.52±9.67), (130.52±11.58) and (143.54±13.40) Ibs] were significantly higher than those in the control group[(98.53±9.47) , (113.25±10.54) and (125.36±12.46) Ibs], all of which showed an upward trend (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical efficacy of porcelain inlays for cracked teeth after root canal treatment and repair is better than that of full crown repair, which can effectively improve the chewing ability and the gingival condition, the incidence of adverse reactions is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"34 1","pages":"88-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of full crown and porcelain inlay in the treatment of cracked teeth after root canal treatment and repair and its effect on chewing ability and gingival status.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted to select 106 patients with cracked teeth who underwent root canal treatment from December 2020 to December 2023, divided into experimental group and control group according to the random number table method, with 53 cases in each group. The clinical effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were counted and compared. The pain levels [visual analogue scale (VAS)] of the two groups before treatment,1 st, 3 rd and 7 th day after treatment were compared. The gingival conditions [plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), gingival bleeding index (BI) and periodontal pocket depth (PD)] were compared between the two groups before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. The chewing ability (bite force, chewing efficiency) of the two groups before treatment, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of follow-up were compared.Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 25.0 software package.

Results: The good rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the total incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). At the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after treatment, VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment. The experimental group[(4.43±0.68), (3.15±0.63) and (2.04±0.51) points] were significantly lower than the control group[(4.86±0.57), (3.81±0.67) and (2.86±0.52) points], all showed a downward trend (P<0.05). At 6 months of follow-up, BI and PD in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, GI and PLI were lower than those before treatment. GI, PLI, BI and PD in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). After 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up, the masticatory efficiency and bite force of the two groups were higher than those before treatment. The masticatory efficiency of the experimental group was (70.25±5.57)%, (85.36±6.74)% and (92.57±6.35)%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group[(62.35±5.44)%, (73.57±6.32)% and (84.26±6.22)%]. The bite force in the experimental group[(112.52±9.67), (130.52±11.58) and (143.54±13.40) Ibs] were significantly higher than those in the control group[(98.53±9.47) , (113.25±10.54) and (125.36±12.46) Ibs], all of which showed an upward trend (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The clinical efficacy of porcelain inlays for cracked teeth after root canal treatment and repair is better than that of full crown repair, which can effectively improve the chewing ability and the gingival condition, the incidence of adverse reactions is low.

全冠+瓷嵌体修复对咀嚼功能和牙龈状况的影响。
目的:探讨全冠瓷嵌体治疗根管治疗及修复后牙裂的临床疗效及其对咀嚼能力和牙龈状态的影响。方法:前瞻性研究选择2020年12月~ 2023年12月行根管治疗的牙裂患者106例,按随机数字表法分为实验组和对照组,每组53例。统计比较两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应。比较两组患者治疗前、治疗后第1天、第3天、第7天的疼痛水平[视觉模拟评分(VAS)]。比较两组患者治疗前及随访6个月后的牙龈状况[菌斑指数(PLI)、牙龈指数(GI)、牙龈出血指数(BI)、牙周袋深度(PD)]。比较两组患者治疗前、随访1个月、3个月、6个月的咀嚼能力(咬合力、咀嚼效率)。采用SPSS 25.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果:实验组优良率高于对照组,不良反应总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后第1、3、7天,两组患者VAS评分均显著低于治疗前。实验组[(4.43±0.68)、(3.15±0.63)、(2.04±0.51)分]显著低于对照组[(4.86±0.57)、(3.81±0.67)、(2.86±0.52)分],均呈下降趋势(P<0.05)。随访6个月时,两组患者BI、PD均高于治疗前,GI、PLI均低于治疗前。实验组患者GI、PLI、BI、PD均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。随访1、3、6个月后,两组患者的咀嚼效率和咬合力均高于治疗前。实验组咀嚼效率分别为(70.25±5.57)%、(85.36±6.74)%和(92.57±6.35)%,显著高于对照组[(62.35±5.44)%、(73.57±6.32)%和(84.26±6.22)%]。实验组的咬合力[(112.52±9.67)、(130.52±11.58)、(143.54±13.40)Ibs]显著高于对照组[(98.53±9.47)、(113.25±10.54)、(125.36±12.46)Ibs],且均呈上升趋势(P<0.05)。结论:烤瓷嵌体治疗根管治疗修复后牙裂的临床疗效优于全冠修复,可有效改善咀嚼能力和牙龈状况,不良反应发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍: "Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信