Intensive End-of-Life Care: Implementation of a Canadian Guideline-Based Order Set for the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0091
Alison Knapp, Jennifer M O'Brien, Maria Cruz, Mary Ellen Walker, Joann Kawchuk, Carol Brons, Sabira Valiani
{"title":"Intensive End-of-Life Care: Implementation of a Canadian Guideline-Based Order Set for the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Alison Knapp, Jennifer M O'Brien, Maria Cruz, Mary Ellen Walker, Joann Kawchuk, Carol Brons, Sabira Valiani","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of patients receive end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Death often occurs in the ICU after a decision has been made to withdraw life-sustaining therapies. In 2016, Downar et al. published Canadian consensus guidelines to standardize practices for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in the ICU. In this study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an order set, nursing flowsheet, and nursing care plan based on these guidelines in two ICUs in Saskatchewan, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, engaging a steering committee of ICU health care providers and leadership to guide implementation. We conducted a six-month pilot implementation. We collected data in the three months pre-implementation, during the six-month implementation period, and for three months post-implementation. To evaluate implementation outcomes, we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop semi-structured interviews and feasibility surveys. To measure effectiveness outcomes, bedside nurses completed Quality of Death and Dying surveys, and we performed a patient chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention materials added to the burden of paperwork of bedside health care providers but helped them provide quality end-of-life care, meet the needs of patients and their families, and lessen ethical tensions between symptom control and hastening death. There was no difference in cumulative sedative dosing and time to death after extubation in the pre-implementation, implementation, or post-implementation periods. A significant increase in symptom assessment (pain, dyspnea, and agitation) using standardized tools was observed during the implementation and post-implementation periods. There was an improvement in holistic care outcomes post-implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We implemented current Canadian best-practice guidelines for providing end-of-life care in the ICU using a multidisciplinary approach. This study offers insight into how standardized symptom assessment and medication titration can be incorporated into the complex ICU environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"161-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of patients receive end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Death often occurs in the ICU after a decision has been made to withdraw life-sustaining therapies. In 2016, Downar et al. published Canadian consensus guidelines to standardize practices for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in the ICU. In this study, we sought to understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an order set, nursing flowsheet, and nursing care plan based on these guidelines in two ICUs in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Methods: We used a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, engaging a steering committee of ICU health care providers and leadership to guide implementation. We conducted a six-month pilot implementation. We collected data in the three months pre-implementation, during the six-month implementation period, and for three months post-implementation. To evaluate implementation outcomes, we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop semi-structured interviews and feasibility surveys. To measure effectiveness outcomes, bedside nurses completed Quality of Death and Dying surveys, and we performed a patient chart review.

Results: The intervention materials added to the burden of paperwork of bedside health care providers but helped them provide quality end-of-life care, meet the needs of patients and their families, and lessen ethical tensions between symptom control and hastening death. There was no difference in cumulative sedative dosing and time to death after extubation in the pre-implementation, implementation, or post-implementation periods. A significant increase in symptom assessment (pain, dyspnea, and agitation) using standardized tools was observed during the implementation and post-implementation periods. There was an improvement in holistic care outcomes post-implementation.

Conclusions: We implemented current Canadian best-practice guidelines for providing end-of-life care in the ICU using a multidisciplinary approach. This study offers insight into how standardized symptom assessment and medication titration can be incorporated into the complex ICU environment.

强化临终关怀:加拿大基于指南的重症监护室生命维持治疗退出命令集的实施。
背景:越来越多的患者在重症监护病房(ICU)接受临终关怀。死亡往往发生在ICU后,已决定撤回维持生命的治疗。2016年,Downar等人发表了加拿大共识指南,以规范ICU中停止生命维持治疗的做法。在这项研究中,我们试图了解在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省的两个icu中实施基于这些指南的指令集、护理流程和护理计划的可行性和可接受性。方法:我们采用有效性-实施混合设计,由ICU卫生保健提供者和领导层组成指导委员会指导实施。我们进行了为期六个月的试点实施。我们在实施前的三个月、六个月的实施期间和实施后的三个月收集了数据。为了评估实施结果,我们使用了实施研究综合框架来开发半结构化访谈和可行性调查。为了测量有效性结果,床边护士完成了死亡质量和临终调查,我们进行了患者图表回顾。结果:干预材料增加了床边卫生保健提供者的文书工作负担,但有助于他们提供高质量的临终关怀,满足患者及其家属的需求,减轻症状控制与加速死亡之间的伦理紧张关系。在实施前、实施后或实施后,累积镇静剂量和拔管后死亡时间没有差异。在实施期间和实施后,使用标准化工具进行的症状评估(疼痛、呼吸困难和躁动)显著增加。实施后整体护理结果有所改善。结论:我们采用多学科方法实施了目前加拿大ICU提供临终关怀的最佳实践指南。这项研究为如何将标准化症状评估和药物滴定纳入复杂的ICU环境提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信