Jessica Salley Riccardi, Paul D S Fink, Justin R Brown, Helen Murray-James
{"title":"Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives On Virtual Reality for Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Jessica Salley Riccardi, Paul D S Fink, Justin R Brown, Helen Murray-James","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although evidence supports virtual reality (VR) applications in rehabilitation and education, investigations into VR technology for children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are still evolving and lack robust evidence related to design or effectiveness. The purpose of the present study was to understand the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for designing VR tools that are acceptable and feasible for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-one SLPs completed a self-administered online survey related to their awareness and opinions on VR and its potential application to childhood TBI broadly and within a case study of a child with TBI. Data were analyzed descriptively and using a modified version of systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants, on average, reported being \"somewhat aware\" of VR and \"neither not aware or unaware\" of the idea of VR as a clinical tool. Participants generally had positive ratings for the potential use of VR to childhood TBI generally and in response to a case study centered on cognitive-communication skills. Through open-ended questions, participants identified various (a) benefits (e.g., ability for VR to simulate functional tasks or contexts) or (b) hesitations or challenges (e.g., limitations related to client ability, lack of equipment access) for using VR with children with brain injury related to design and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although further development and translation research is needed, the perspectives of SLPs included in the present study can be utilized to inform future development and implementation efforts to ensure VR design that is inclusive, participatory, and best fit to future SLP practice with children with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Although evidence supports virtual reality (VR) applications in rehabilitation and education, investigations into VR technology for children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are still evolving and lack robust evidence related to design or effectiveness. The purpose of the present study was to understand the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for designing VR tools that are acceptable and feasible for clinical practice.
Method: Thirty-one SLPs completed a self-administered online survey related to their awareness and opinions on VR and its potential application to childhood TBI broadly and within a case study of a child with TBI. Data were analyzed descriptively and using a modified version of systematic text condensation.
Results: Participants, on average, reported being "somewhat aware" of VR and "neither not aware or unaware" of the idea of VR as a clinical tool. Participants generally had positive ratings for the potential use of VR to childhood TBI generally and in response to a case study centered on cognitive-communication skills. Through open-ended questions, participants identified various (a) benefits (e.g., ability for VR to simulate functional tasks or contexts) or (b) hesitations or challenges (e.g., limitations related to client ability, lack of equipment access) for using VR with children with brain injury related to design and implementation.
Conclusion: Although further development and translation research is needed, the perspectives of SLPs included in the present study can be utilized to inform future development and implementation efforts to ensure VR design that is inclusive, participatory, and best fit to future SLP practice with children with TBI.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.