Makayla Z Ward, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Wieske van Zoest
{"title":"A British understanding of racialised gaze-cueing in the context of implicit racial bias, explicit racial identity and self-esteem.","authors":"Makayla Z Ward, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Wieske van Zoest","doi":"10.1177/17470218251335304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gaze-cueing is subject to social influences; people tend to shift their attention in the same direction as others, but this relationship may be affected by the observer's race and the observed's race. Evidence suggests that Italian (Black and White) and American (Black and White) populations show preferential ingroup gaze-cueing for White participants, but no preferential variance for Black participants. This experimental study aimed to examine the robustness of this effect within a British population, with a secondary aim of understanding processes behind racial differences via the use of implicit racial bias, explicit racial identity and self-esteem measures. Results revealed that Black participants showed an ingroup bias in gaze-cueing, whereas no such bias was observed for White participants, contradicting previous findings. The hypothesised secondary processes did not significantly influence the biases in gaze-cueing between groups. These findings emphasise intergroup variability's importance in gaining a better understanding of how racialised gaze-cueing manifests across different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251335304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251335304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gaze-cueing is subject to social influences; people tend to shift their attention in the same direction as others, but this relationship may be affected by the observer's race and the observed's race. Evidence suggests that Italian (Black and White) and American (Black and White) populations show preferential ingroup gaze-cueing for White participants, but no preferential variance for Black participants. This experimental study aimed to examine the robustness of this effect within a British population, with a secondary aim of understanding processes behind racial differences via the use of implicit racial bias, explicit racial identity and self-esteem measures. Results revealed that Black participants showed an ingroup bias in gaze-cueing, whereas no such bias was observed for White participants, contradicting previous findings. The hypothesised secondary processes did not significantly influence the biases in gaze-cueing between groups. These findings emphasise intergroup variability's importance in gaining a better understanding of how racialised gaze-cueing manifests across different populations.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.