Nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluation in a pre-registration nurse education programme: A qualitative study.

Joseph Sitwira, Daniel O Ashipala, Vaja Katjimune
{"title":"Nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluation in a pre-registration nurse education programme: A qualitative study.","authors":"Joseph Sitwira, Daniel O Ashipala, Vaja Katjimune","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The evaluation of clinical competence is a diverse, rigorous procedure that determines a student's clinical competence. Despite this, little research exists on nursing students' experiences with clinical competency evaluations in Namibia. Nurse educators should thus explore nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluations in order to establish what challenges they face, as this can be beneficial for nurturing a positive learning environment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This research assesses nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluations in a pre-registration nurse education programme at the Faculty of Health Sciences in Namibia, University of Namibia, Rundu campus.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> The study was conducted at a public nurse education institution in Namibia. A qualitative approach was employed utilising an exploratory, contextual and descriptive design. This study was conducted from August 2023 to October 2023 among (second-, third- and fourth-year) nursing students who were enrolled for a Bachelor of Nursing Science (Clinical) (Honours) degree. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 nursing students being selected using a convenience sampling method. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis method was utilised to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Three themes emerged in this study: (1) positive experiences of evaluation for clinical competence; (2) negative experiences of evaluation for clinical competence and; (3) recommendations to improve the clinical evaluation of competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The results showed that nursing students had both negative and positive experiences during the clinical assessment process. The positive experiences included integrating theory and practice, while negative experiences included the poor attitudes of the clinical evaluators and limited time.Contribution: The results of this study can be used to develop targeted interventions and strategies to improve the challenges students encounter during clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"48 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The evaluation of clinical competence is a diverse, rigorous procedure that determines a student's clinical competence. Despite this, little research exists on nursing students' experiences with clinical competency evaluations in Namibia. Nurse educators should thus explore nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluations in order to establish what challenges they face, as this can be beneficial for nurturing a positive learning environment.

Objectives:  This research assesses nursing students' experiences of clinical competency evaluations in a pre-registration nurse education programme at the Faculty of Health Sciences in Namibia, University of Namibia, Rundu campus.

Method:  The study was conducted at a public nurse education institution in Namibia. A qualitative approach was employed utilising an exploratory, contextual and descriptive design. This study was conducted from August 2023 to October 2023 among (second-, third- and fourth-year) nursing students who were enrolled for a Bachelor of Nursing Science (Clinical) (Honours) degree. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 nursing students being selected using a convenience sampling method. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis method was utilised to analyse the data.

Results:  Three themes emerged in this study: (1) positive experiences of evaluation for clinical competence; (2) negative experiences of evaluation for clinical competence and; (3) recommendations to improve the clinical evaluation of competence.

Conclusion:  The results showed that nursing students had both negative and positive experiences during the clinical assessment process. The positive experiences included integrating theory and practice, while negative experiences included the poor attitudes of the clinical evaluators and limited time.Contribution: The results of this study can be used to develop targeted interventions and strategies to improve the challenges students encounter during clinical assessment.

注册前护生临床能力评估经验之质性研究。
背景:临床能力的评估是一个多样化的,严格的程序,以确定学生的临床能力。尽管如此,关于纳米比亚护理专业学生临床能力评估经验的研究很少。因此,护理教育者应该探索护理学生的临床能力评估经验,以确定他们面临的挑战,因为这有利于培养积极的学习环境。目的:本研究评估在纳米比亚大学润度校区纳米比亚健康科学学院注册前护士教育项目中护理学生临床能力评估的经验。方法:在纳米比亚一所公立护士教育机构进行研究。采用探索性、情境性和描述性设计的定性方法。本研究于2023年8月至2023年10月在攻读护理科学(临床)(荣誉)学士学位的二年级、三年级和四年级护理学生中进行。采用半结构化访谈法,采用方便抽样法对16名护生进行数据收集。所有采访都有录音,并逐字抄写。采用专题分析方法对数据进行分析。结果:本研究呈现出三个主题:(1)临床能力评估的正面体验;(2)临床能力评价的负面体验;(3)改进临床能力评价的建议。结论:结果显示护生在临床评估过程中既有消极体验,也有积极体验。积极体验包括理论与实践的结合,消极体验包括临床评估者态度不佳和时间有限。贡献:本研究的结果可用于制定有针对性的干预措施和策略,以改善学生在临床评估中遇到的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信