The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Omar T F Ahmed, Ziyad Tarek Ahmed, Abdulrahman W Dairi, Maha Saad Zain Al-Abeden, Mohammed H Alkahlot, Rana H Alkahlot, Ghazi I Al Jowf, Lars M T Eijssen, Khawaja Husnain Haider
{"title":"The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.","authors":"Omar T F Ahmed, Ziyad Tarek Ahmed, Abdulrahman W Dairi, Maha Saad Zain Al-Abeden, Mohammed H Alkahlot, Rana H Alkahlot, Ghazi I Al Jowf, Lars M T Eijssen, Khawaja Husnain Haider","doi":"10.1186/s13287-025-04209-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of MSC therapy for heart failure patients. This study delves into mesenchymal stem cells' promising potential, offering a beacon of hope for the future of heart failure treatment with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases and registers for RCTs, including PubMed, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and other relevant websites. We then selected thirteen RCTs with 1184 participants based on our pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two independent assessors extracted the data and performed a quality assessment. The data were then plotted for various outcomes, including death, hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, pump function parameters, and 6-min walk distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safety of MSC-based treatment has been consistently demonstrated with MSCs from autologous (<sup>Auto</sup>MSCs) and allogeneic (<sup>Allo</sup>MSCs) sources. This reassuring finding underscores the reliability of MSC-based therapy irrespective of their source. However, <sup>Auto</sup>MSCs showed a trend toward greater protective benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between <sup>Auto</sup>MSCs and <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs in improving LVEF; 0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%) for <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs versus 2.17% (- 0.48%; 95% CI - 1.33-5.67%) for <sup>Auto</sup>MSCs. <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs significantly reduced end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL). Only <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs significantly improved 6-min walking distance (6-MWD); 31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m) for <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs versus 31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m) for <sup>Auto</sup>MSCs. The exclusion of studies using adipose-derived cells resulted in even better safety and a significant improvement in LVEF for <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that <sup>Allo</sup>MSCs are at par with <sup>Auto</sup>MSCs in improving functional outcomes in heart failure patients. This underscores the need for future investigations in a larger patient cohort, emphasizing the urgency and importance of further research to fully understand the potential of MSCs in treating heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21876,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04209-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of MSC therapy for heart failure patients. This study delves into mesenchymal stem cells' promising potential, offering a beacon of hope for the future of heart failure treatment with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched four databases and registers for RCTs, including PubMed, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and other relevant websites. We then selected thirteen RCTs with 1184 participants based on our pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two independent assessors extracted the data and performed a quality assessment. The data were then plotted for various outcomes, including death, hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, pump function parameters, and 6-min walk distance.
Results: The safety of MSC-based treatment has been consistently demonstrated with MSCs from autologous (AutoMSCs) and allogeneic (AlloMSCs) sources. This reassuring finding underscores the reliability of MSC-based therapy irrespective of their source. However, AutoMSCs showed a trend toward greater protective benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between AutoMSCs and AlloMSCs in improving LVEF; 0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%) for AlloMSCs versus 2.17% (- 0.48%; 95% CI - 1.33-5.67%) for AutoMSCs. AlloMSCs significantly reduced end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL). Only AlloMSCs significantly improved 6-min walking distance (6-MWD); 31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m) for AlloMSCs versus 31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m) for AutoMSCs. The exclusion of studies using adipose-derived cells resulted in even better safety and a significant improvement in LVEF for AlloMSCs treatment.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that AlloMSCs are at par with AutoMSCs in improving functional outcomes in heart failure patients. This underscores the need for future investigations in a larger patient cohort, emphasizing the urgency and importance of further research to fully understand the potential of MSCs in treating heart failure.
背景:最近的随机对照试验一致证明了骨髓间充质干细胞治疗心力衰竭患者的安全性和潜在疗效。本研究深入探讨了间充质干细胞的巨大潜力,为降低射血分数(HFrEF)治疗心力衰竭的未来提供了希望的灯塔。方法:在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。我们检索了PubMed、EBSCO、clinicaltrials.gov、ICTRP和其他相关网站等4个数据库和注册库。然后,根据我们预先定义的纳入/排除标准,我们选择了13项随机对照试验,共1184名受试者。两名独立评估人员提取数据并进行质量评估。然后绘制各种结果的数据,包括死亡、住院、主要心脏不良事件、泵功能参数和6分钟步行距离。结果:自体(AutoMSCs)和异体(AlloMSCs)来源的MSCs均证实了基于MSCs治疗的安全性。这一令人安心的发现强调了基于骨髓间质干细胞的治疗的可靠性,无论其来源如何。然而,automsc显示出更大的保护作用。亚组分析显示,AutoMSCs和AlloMSCs在改善LVEF方面无显著差异;AlloMSCs为0.86% (95% CI - 1.21-2.94%),而AlloMSCs为2.17% (- 0.48%;95% CI - 1.33-5.67%)。AlloMSCs显著降低舒张末期容积(LVEDV) - 2.08 mL (95% CI - 3.52-0.64 mL)。只有AlloMSCs显著改善了6分钟步行距离(6-MWD);AlloMSCs为31.88 m (95% CI 5.03-58.74 m),而AutoMSCs为31.71 m (95% CI - 8.91-71.25 m)。排除了使用脂肪来源细胞的研究,使得LVEF治疗AlloMSCs的安全性更高,并且显著改善。结论:我们的研究结果表明,AlloMSCs与AutoMSCs在改善心力衰竭患者的功能结局方面具有同等作用。这强调了在更大的患者队列中进行未来研究的必要性,强调了进一步研究的紧迫性和重要性,以充分了解MSCs治疗心力衰竭的潜力。
期刊介绍:
Stem Cell Research & Therapy serves as a leading platform for translational research in stem cell therapies. This international, peer-reviewed journal publishes high-quality open-access research articles, with a focus on basic, translational, and clinical research in stem cell therapeutics and regenerative therapies. Coverage includes animal models and clinical trials. Additionally, the journal offers reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, and reports.