Converting waste into value. Stability of leftover EDTA whole blood: serum vs. plasma for nine clinical chemistry analyses.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Cindhya Sithiravel, Tor A Strand, Ingunn Tjelde Fauskrud, Ine Kathrine Granberg, Hege K Tjølsen Hermansen, Ragnhild Røysland, Kjersti S Bakken
{"title":"Converting waste into value. Stability of leftover EDTA whole blood: serum <i>vs.</i> plasma for nine clinical chemistry analyses.","authors":"Cindhya Sithiravel, Tor A Strand, Ingunn Tjelde Fauskrud, Ine Kathrine Granberg, Hege K Tjølsen Hermansen, Ragnhild Røysland, Kjersti S Bakken","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2494261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the utility of leftover EDTA whole blood from a diagnostic biobank for determining concentrations of ferritin, cobalamin, homocysteine, hCG, and thyroid-related hormones and antibodies (TSH, fT4, fT3, TRAb, and anti-TPO). Twenty participants were included. Pre-analytical bias in their blood samples was assessed as per European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Milano performance specifications. We evaluated the stability of EDTA whole blood stored at various intervals (days 0, 1, 6, and 13), and compared plasma derived from these samples with serum samples. Bland Altman plots and Paired <i>t</i>-test were used to identify statistically significant differences. We found good quantitative agreement, with biases within set performance specifications for cobalamin (14%), fT4 (3.5%), fT3 (3.6%), TSH (15%), and ferritin (7.4%). The calculated biases for serum <i>vs.</i> EDTA plasma day 6 were as follows: cobalamin 1.9%, fT4 2.6%, fT3 0.4%, TSH -2.1%, and ferritin -4.5%. The biases for homocysteine exceeded limits in all comparisons, except serum <i>vs.</i> EDTA plasma on day 0 and between EDTA plasma from day 0 and day 1. The calculated bias of 41% exceeded the set limit of 13% when comparing serum with EDTA plasma day 6. For hCG, anti-TPO, and TRAb, limited measurable levels restricted bias calculations. As per the diagnostic biobank protocols, EDTA blood stored for up to 6 days provides plasma suitable for analyzing cobalamin, fT4, fT3, TSH, and ferritin. Our study confirms previous findings that homocysteine has poor stability in whole blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":"85 3","pages":"214-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2494261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the utility of leftover EDTA whole blood from a diagnostic biobank for determining concentrations of ferritin, cobalamin, homocysteine, hCG, and thyroid-related hormones and antibodies (TSH, fT4, fT3, TRAb, and anti-TPO). Twenty participants were included. Pre-analytical bias in their blood samples was assessed as per European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Milano performance specifications. We evaluated the stability of EDTA whole blood stored at various intervals (days 0, 1, 6, and 13), and compared plasma derived from these samples with serum samples. Bland Altman plots and Paired t-test were used to identify statistically significant differences. We found good quantitative agreement, with biases within set performance specifications for cobalamin (14%), fT4 (3.5%), fT3 (3.6%), TSH (15%), and ferritin (7.4%). The calculated biases for serum vs. EDTA plasma day 6 were as follows: cobalamin 1.9%, fT4 2.6%, fT3 0.4%, TSH -2.1%, and ferritin -4.5%. The biases for homocysteine exceeded limits in all comparisons, except serum vs. EDTA plasma on day 0 and between EDTA plasma from day 0 and day 1. The calculated bias of 41% exceeded the set limit of 13% when comparing serum with EDTA plasma day 6. For hCG, anti-TPO, and TRAb, limited measurable levels restricted bias calculations. As per the diagnostic biobank protocols, EDTA blood stored for up to 6 days provides plasma suitable for analyzing cobalamin, fT4, fT3, TSH, and ferritin. Our study confirms previous findings that homocysteine has poor stability in whole blood.

变废为宝。剩余EDTA全血的稳定性:九种临床化学分析的血清与血浆。
本研究评估了诊断生物库中剩余EDTA全血在测定铁蛋白、钴胺素、同型半胱氨酸、hCG和甲状腺相关激素和抗体(TSH、fT4、fT3、TRAb和抗tpo)浓度方面的效用。共纳入20名参与者。根据欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会米兰性能规范评估血液样本的分析前偏差。我们评估了EDTA全血在不同时间间隔(0、1、6和13天)储存的稳定性,并将这些样本的血浆与血清样本进行了比较。使用Bland Altman图和配对t检验来确定有统计学意义的差异。我们发现了良好的定量一致性,在钴胺素(14%)、fT4(3.5%)、fT3(3.6%)、TSH(15%)和铁蛋白(7.4%)的设定性能规范中存在偏差。第6天血清与EDTA血浆的计算偏差如下:钴胺素1.9%,fT4 2.6%, fT3 0.4%, TSH -2.1%,铁蛋白-4.5%。除了第0天的血清与EDTA血浆以及第0天和第1天的EDTA血浆之间,所有比较中同型半胱氨酸的偏倚都超过了限制。当比较第6天的血清和EDTA血浆时,计算偏差为41%,超过了设定的13%的限制。对于hCG、抗tpo和TRAb,有限的可测量水平限制了偏置计算。根据诊断生物库协议,EDTA血液储存长达6天,提供适合分析钴胺素、fT4、fT3、TSH和铁蛋白的血浆。我们的研究证实了先前的发现,即同型半胱氨酸在全血中的稳定性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信