Rachel Glenn, Daniel Ross, Chase Gauthier, Tyler Gonzalez, J Benjamin Jackson
{"title":"Comparison of an Opioid-Free Multimodal Pain Regimen to an Opioid-Containing Regimen in Elective, Outpatient, Bunion, and Forefoot Surgery.","authors":"Rachel Glenn, Daniel Ross, Chase Gauthier, Tyler Gonzalez, J Benjamin Jackson","doi":"10.1177/19386400251333042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMultimodal, opioid-free regimens for postoperative pain have been increasing in popularity due to concerns regarding the current opioid crisis. Despite their increased popularity, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of these regimens for outpatient forefoot procedures. This study looks to compare a multimodal, opioid-free pain control regimen to a historical opioid regimen in patients undergoing elective, outpatient forefoot procedures.MethodsData were collected prospectively in patients undergoing elective outpatient forefoot procedures, including bunion, bunionette, and lesser toe corrections, who were using a multimodal pain regimen, consisting of Acetaminophen, Meloxicam, Ketorolac, Cyclobenzaprine, and Pregabalin, from December 2020 to June 2022 and retrospectively for patient's undergoing similar procedures using an opioid-containing regimen, consisting of either oxycodone or hydrocodone, from October 2018 to February 2020 to at a single academic institution. Demographic information, VAS pain scores, satisfaction rating, and rescue opioid medication use were recorded. Continuous data were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing a patient's VAS pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively when controlling for confounding variables. All P < .05 were considered significant.ResultsA total of 41 patients were included in the opioid-free multimodal regimen group and 59 in the opioid-containing group. There was no significant difference between the multimodal group and opioid group in VAS pain score at 2 weeks postoperatively (1.4 vs 1.0, P = .26). Patients in the multimodal group had an 88% satisfaction rating. 17% required rescue opioid medications. Multivariable analysis demonstrated utilization of the multimodal pain regimen did not significantly influence VAS scores at 2 weeks postoperatively when controlling for confounding variables (P = .06).ConclusionOur multimodal, opioid-free pain control regimen demonstrated similar effectiveness, with high satisfaction and low rescue opioid use, as an opioid-containing regimen in patients undergoing elective outpatient foot and ankle procedures. These findings demonstrate this multimodal pain regimen is effective at controlling postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective outpatient forefoot procedures.Level of Evidence:II.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251333042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251333042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundMultimodal, opioid-free regimens for postoperative pain have been increasing in popularity due to concerns regarding the current opioid crisis. Despite their increased popularity, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of these regimens for outpatient forefoot procedures. This study looks to compare a multimodal, opioid-free pain control regimen to a historical opioid regimen in patients undergoing elective, outpatient forefoot procedures.MethodsData were collected prospectively in patients undergoing elective outpatient forefoot procedures, including bunion, bunionette, and lesser toe corrections, who were using a multimodal pain regimen, consisting of Acetaminophen, Meloxicam, Ketorolac, Cyclobenzaprine, and Pregabalin, from December 2020 to June 2022 and retrospectively for patient's undergoing similar procedures using an opioid-containing regimen, consisting of either oxycodone or hydrocodone, from October 2018 to February 2020 to at a single academic institution. Demographic information, VAS pain scores, satisfaction rating, and rescue opioid medication use were recorded. Continuous data were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing a patient's VAS pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively when controlling for confounding variables. All P < .05 were considered significant.ResultsA total of 41 patients were included in the opioid-free multimodal regimen group and 59 in the opioid-containing group. There was no significant difference between the multimodal group and opioid group in VAS pain score at 2 weeks postoperatively (1.4 vs 1.0, P = .26). Patients in the multimodal group had an 88% satisfaction rating. 17% required rescue opioid medications. Multivariable analysis demonstrated utilization of the multimodal pain regimen did not significantly influence VAS scores at 2 weeks postoperatively when controlling for confounding variables (P = .06).ConclusionOur multimodal, opioid-free pain control regimen demonstrated similar effectiveness, with high satisfaction and low rescue opioid use, as an opioid-containing regimen in patients undergoing elective outpatient foot and ankle procedures. These findings demonstrate this multimodal pain regimen is effective at controlling postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective outpatient forefoot procedures.Level of Evidence:II.
由于对当前阿片类药物危机的担忧,多模式、无阿片类药物治疗术后疼痛的方案越来越受欢迎。尽管它们越来越受欢迎,但关于这些方案在门诊前足手术中的有效性的证据有限。本研究旨在比较多模式,无阿片类药物的疼痛控制方案和历史阿片类药物方案的患者接受选择性门诊前足手术。方法前瞻性收集2020年12月至2022年6月接受选择性门诊前足手术(包括拇外翻、拇外翻和小脚趾矫正)的患者的数据,这些患者正在使用由对乙酰氨基酚、美洛昔康、酮罗拉酸、环苯扎林和普瑞巴林组成的多模式疼痛方案,并回顾性收集接受类似手术的患者使用含阿片类药物方案,包括羟考酮或氢可酮。从2018年10月到2020年2月,在一个学术机构学习。记录人口统计信息、VAS疼痛评分、满意度评分和救援阿片类药物使用情况。连续资料采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。在控制混杂变量的情况下,采用多变量线性回归分析确定影响患者术后2周VAS疼痛评分的因素。P < 0.05均认为差异有统计学意义。结果无阿片类药物多模式治疗组41例,含阿片类药物多模式治疗组59例。多模式组与阿片类药物组术后2周VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(1.4 vs 1.0, P = 0.26)。多模式组患者满意度为88%。17%需要阿片类药物救助。多变量分析表明,在控制混杂变量的情况下,多模式疼痛方案的使用对术后2周的VAS评分没有显著影响(P = 0.06)。结论:我们的多模式、无阿片类药物疼痛控制方案在选择性门诊足部和踝关节手术患者中显示出与含阿片类药物方案相似的有效性,具有高满意度和低阿片类药物的救援使用。这些发现表明,这种多模式疼痛方案是有效的控制术后疼痛的病人接受选择性门诊前足手术。证据水平:II。