Nonlinear Relationship Between Vital Signs and Hospitalization/Emergency Department Visits Among Older Home Healthcare Patients and Critical Vital Sign Cutoff for Adverse Outcomes: Application of Generalized Additive Model.
Se Hee Min, Jiyoun Song, Lauren Evans, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sena Chae, Sridevi Sridharan, Yolanda Barrón, Maxim Topaz
{"title":"Nonlinear Relationship Between Vital Signs and Hospitalization/Emergency Department Visits Among Older Home Healthcare Patients and Critical Vital Sign Cutoff for Adverse Outcomes: Application of Generalized Additive Model.","authors":"Se Hee Min, Jiyoun Song, Lauren Evans, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sena Chae, Sridevi Sridharan, Yolanda Barrón, Maxim Topaz","doi":"10.1177/10547738251336488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have focused on identifying risk factors for older adults receiving home healthcare services without considering vital signs. This may provide important information on deteriorating health conditions that may lead to hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. Thus, it is important to understand the relationship between vital signs and hospitalization and/or ED visits and critical vital sign points for mitigating the higher risks of hospitalization and/or ED visits. This secondary data analysis uses cross-sectional data from a large, urban home healthcare organization (<i>n</i> = 61,615). A generalized additive model was used to understand the nonlinear relationship between each vital sign and hospitalization and/or ED visits through three unadjusted and adjusted models, and to identify a critical vital sign point related to a higher risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits. A significant nonlinear relationship (effective degree of freedom >2.0) was found between systolic, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, hospitalization, and/or ED visits. The critical inflection point for systolic blood pressure was 120.36 (SE 3.625, <i>p</i> < .001), diastolic blood pressure was 72.00 (SE 3.108, <i>p</i> < .001), and heart rate was 83.24 (SE 1.994, <i>p</i> = .052). Among all vital signs, the risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits sharply increased when an older adult's heart rate surpassed 83.24 bpm. Our findings reveal that vital signs may serve as a critical indicator of a patient's clinical condition, especially related to hospitalization and/or ED visit. Clinicians need to be cognizant of these critical thresholds for each vital sign and monitor any deviations from baseline to preempt adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"10547738251336488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251336488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous studies have focused on identifying risk factors for older adults receiving home healthcare services without considering vital signs. This may provide important information on deteriorating health conditions that may lead to hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. Thus, it is important to understand the relationship between vital signs and hospitalization and/or ED visits and critical vital sign points for mitigating the higher risks of hospitalization and/or ED visits. This secondary data analysis uses cross-sectional data from a large, urban home healthcare organization (n = 61,615). A generalized additive model was used to understand the nonlinear relationship between each vital sign and hospitalization and/or ED visits through three unadjusted and adjusted models, and to identify a critical vital sign point related to a higher risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits. A significant nonlinear relationship (effective degree of freedom >2.0) was found between systolic, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, hospitalization, and/or ED visits. The critical inflection point for systolic blood pressure was 120.36 (SE 3.625, p < .001), diastolic blood pressure was 72.00 (SE 3.108, p < .001), and heart rate was 83.24 (SE 1.994, p = .052). Among all vital signs, the risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits sharply increased when an older adult's heart rate surpassed 83.24 bpm. Our findings reveal that vital signs may serve as a critical indicator of a patient's clinical condition, especially related to hospitalization and/or ED visit. Clinicians need to be cognizant of these critical thresholds for each vital sign and monitor any deviations from baseline to preempt adverse outcomes.
以前的研究集中在确定老年人在没有考虑生命体征的情况下接受家庭医疗保健服务的风险因素。这可能为可能导致住院和/或急诊(ED)就诊的健康状况恶化提供重要信息。因此,了解生命体征与住院和/或急诊科就诊之间的关系以及关键生命体征点对于降低住院和/或急诊科就诊的较高风险非常重要。此辅助数据分析使用了来自大型城市家庭医疗保健组织的横断面数据(n = 61,615)。采用广义加性模型,通过三种未调整模型和调整模型,了解各生命体征与住院和/或急诊科就诊之间的非线性关系,并确定与住院和/或急诊科就诊高风险相关的关键生命体征点。收缩压、舒张压、心率、住院和/或急诊科就诊之间存在显著的非线性关系(有效自由度bbb2.0)。收缩压临界拐点为120.36 (SE 3.625, p p p = 0.052)。在所有生命体征中,当老年人的心率超过83.24 bpm时,住院和/或急诊科就诊的风险急剧增加。我们的研究结果表明,生命体征可能是患者临床状况的关键指标,特别是与住院和/或急诊科就诊有关。临床医生需要认识到每个生命体征的这些临界阈值,并监测与基线的任何偏差,以预防不良后果。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).