Running-Centred Injury Prevention Support: A Scoping Review on Current Injury Risk Reduction Practices for Runners.

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tsm2/3007544
Linda Linton, Jane Culpan, Judith Lane
{"title":"Running-Centred Injury Prevention Support: A Scoping Review on Current Injury Risk Reduction Practices for Runners.","authors":"Linda Linton, Jane Culpan, Judith Lane","doi":"10.1155/tsm2/3007544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Runners have not benefited from the same reduction in injury rates seen in injury prevention studies conducted in other sports. <b>Objectives:</b> The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and map injury risk reduction practices for running-related injury (RRI), methods of delivery and understand the views of experts and runner's preferences in reducing RRI. <b>Design:</b> Scoping review. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted systematic database searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus from 2000 to April 2024. Eligible studies included injury prevention strategies for RRI. Data synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews using Joanna Briggs Institute framework methodology. Extracted data were mapped and coded from intervention studies, expert opinions and reviews, and inductive thematic analysis created subthemes and themes from prospective cohorts, qualitative studies and surveys. <b>Results:</b> A total of 3777 studies were identified, and 106 studies met the inclusion criteria. In intervention studies, supervision and support appeared critical for better effect. Key injury prevention topics were strengthening, gait re-education and wearables, graduated running programmes, footwear, recovery and educational advice. A multifactorial approach considering individual risk profiles was recommended by experts, but there was a disparity in what runners do to reduce injury risk compared to expert advice, with actions appearing to be related to self-efficacy rather than avoidance. <b>Conclusion:</b> This scoping review highlighted runners require individualized, supported and multifactorial approaches for injury risk reduction, and runners seek knowledge on purpose. We found runners injury risk reduction practices should begin early with youth runners and facilitating this through coaching supervision is likely to support behaviour change. Strategies such as gait retraining, wearables and recovery need further exploration but provide promising strategies runners may engage with more. As runners are likely to choose familiar options minimally impacting lifestyle and running, they should be provided with education but need support with their choices to influence beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3007544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tsm2/3007544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Runners have not benefited from the same reduction in injury rates seen in injury prevention studies conducted in other sports. Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and map injury risk reduction practices for running-related injury (RRI), methods of delivery and understand the views of experts and runner's preferences in reducing RRI. Design: Scoping review. Methods: We conducted systematic database searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus from 2000 to April 2024. Eligible studies included injury prevention strategies for RRI. Data synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews using Joanna Briggs Institute framework methodology. Extracted data were mapped and coded from intervention studies, expert opinions and reviews, and inductive thematic analysis created subthemes and themes from prospective cohorts, qualitative studies and surveys. Results: A total of 3777 studies were identified, and 106 studies met the inclusion criteria. In intervention studies, supervision and support appeared critical for better effect. Key injury prevention topics were strengthening, gait re-education and wearables, graduated running programmes, footwear, recovery and educational advice. A multifactorial approach considering individual risk profiles was recommended by experts, but there was a disparity in what runners do to reduce injury risk compared to expert advice, with actions appearing to be related to self-efficacy rather than avoidance. Conclusion: This scoping review highlighted runners require individualized, supported and multifactorial approaches for injury risk reduction, and runners seek knowledge on purpose. We found runners injury risk reduction practices should begin early with youth runners and facilitating this through coaching supervision is likely to support behaviour change. Strategies such as gait retraining, wearables and recovery need further exploration but provide promising strategies runners may engage with more. As runners are likely to choose familiar options minimally impacting lifestyle and running, they should be provided with education but need support with their choices to influence beliefs.

以跑步为中心的伤害预防支持:对当前跑步者伤害风险降低实践的范围审查。
背景:在其他运动中进行的伤害预防研究中,跑步者并没有从同样的伤害发生率降低中获益。目的:本综述的目的是识别和绘制减少跑步相关损伤(RRI)的伤害风险实践,传递方法,并了解专家的观点和跑步者在减少RRI方面的偏好。设计:范围审查。方法:对2000年至2024年4月的MEDLINE、CINAHL和SPORTDiscus数据库进行系统检索。符合条件的研究包括RRI的伤害预防策略。数据综合根据PRISMA扩展范围审查使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所框架方法进行。从干预研究、专家意见和评论中提取的数据进行映射和编码,归纳主题分析从前瞻性队列、定性研究和调查中创建子主题和主题。结果:共纳入3777项研究,106项研究符合纳入标准。在干预研究中,监督和支持对于获得更好的效果至关重要。主要的伤害预防主题是强化、步态再教育和可穿戴设备、毕业跑步计划、鞋类、康复和教育建议。专家建议采用一种考虑个人风险状况的多因素方法,但与专家建议相比,跑步者在减少受伤风险方面所做的工作存在差异,这些行动似乎与自我效能有关,而不是逃避。结论:这个范围回顾强调了跑步者需要个性化的、支持的和多因素的方法来降低伤害风险,跑步者有目的地寻求知识。我们发现跑步者受伤风险降低实践应该尽早开始,并通过教练监督促进这可能会支持行为改变。步态再训练、可穿戴设备和恢复等策略需要进一步探索,但它们提供了有前途的策略,跑步者可能会更多地参与其中。由于跑步者可能会选择熟悉的选择,对生活方式和跑步影响最小,他们应该接受教育,但需要支持他们的选择来影响信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信