Differences in Sleep and Mood State Prior to Exposure are Associated With Success and Failure in a High Stress Environment: Special Forces Selection.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Harris R Lieberman, John A Caldwell, Emily K Farina, Lauren A Thompson, Joseph J Knapik, Stefan M Pasiakos, James P McClung
{"title":"Differences in Sleep and Mood State Prior to Exposure are Associated With Success and Failure in a High Stress Environment: Special Forces Selection.","authors":"Harris R Lieberman, John A Caldwell, Emily K Farina, Lauren A Thompson, Joseph J Knapik, Stefan M Pasiakos, James P McClung","doi":"10.1002/smi.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course (SFAS) is an extremely stressful, physically and mentally challenging 19-20 days long selection procedure. Only 30%-40% of soldiers who volunteer for it complete it. The purpose of SFAS is to identify soldiers who can complete 1-2 years of physically and mentally challenging training for the Special Forces and be successful Special Forces soldiers thereafter. This study examined association of pre-course self-reported mood state and sleep quality and quantity with subsequent success or failure at SFAS. Data from 780 male soldiers collected in 2015-2017 were analysed. Prior to SFAS, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Dimension of Anger Reactivity (DAR), Duke University Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-SSQ), General Anxiety Disorder and Depression inventories (GAD-7), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Group differences among these variables and their ability to predict selection versus non-selection were assessed. There were significant differences in pre-SFAS mood and sleep in selected versus non-selected volunteers. Selected candidates reported more positive mood (POMS vigour, friendliness), less negative mood (POMS depression, anger, fatigue, confusion), less anger (DAR), and less social support (Duke-SSQ). Selected candidates reported longer and higher quality sleep (PSQI) than non-selected soldiers. These differences were not sufficient to serve as an accurate predictive model based on logistic regression, as the best-fit model accounted for 4.9% of the variance. In conclusion, there were differences in pre-course mood state and sleep between those who succeeded or failed a stressful course that selects individuals for elite military training and service, but they were not of sufficient strength to predict individual success of failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 2","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course (SFAS) is an extremely stressful, physically and mentally challenging 19-20 days long selection procedure. Only 30%-40% of soldiers who volunteer for it complete it. The purpose of SFAS is to identify soldiers who can complete 1-2 years of physically and mentally challenging training for the Special Forces and be successful Special Forces soldiers thereafter. This study examined association of pre-course self-reported mood state and sleep quality and quantity with subsequent success or failure at SFAS. Data from 780 male soldiers collected in 2015-2017 were analysed. Prior to SFAS, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Dimension of Anger Reactivity (DAR), Duke University Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-SSQ), General Anxiety Disorder and Depression inventories (GAD-7), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Group differences among these variables and their ability to predict selection versus non-selection were assessed. There were significant differences in pre-SFAS mood and sleep in selected versus non-selected volunteers. Selected candidates reported more positive mood (POMS vigour, friendliness), less negative mood (POMS depression, anger, fatigue, confusion), less anger (DAR), and less social support (Duke-SSQ). Selected candidates reported longer and higher quality sleep (PSQI) than non-selected soldiers. These differences were not sufficient to serve as an accurate predictive model based on logistic regression, as the best-fit model accounted for 4.9% of the variance. In conclusion, there were differences in pre-course mood state and sleep between those who succeeded or failed a stressful course that selects individuals for elite military training and service, but they were not of sufficient strength to predict individual success of failure.

在高压力环境下,暴露前睡眠和情绪状态的差异与成功和失败有关:特种部队的选择。
美国陆军特种部队评估和选拔课程(SFAS)是一个非常紧张的,身体和精神上的挑战长达19-20天的选拔过程。只有30%-40%的士兵自愿参加。SFAS的目的是确定能够完成1-2年身体和精神上具有挑战性的特种部队训练的士兵,并在此之后成为成功的特种部队士兵。本研究考察了课前自我报告的情绪状态、睡眠质量和睡眠数量与后续SFAS成功或失败的关系。分析了2015-2017年收集的780名男性士兵的数据。在SFAS前,采用情绪状态量表(POMS)、愤怒反应量表(DAR)、杜克大学社会支持问卷(Duke- ssq)、一般焦虑障碍和抑郁量表(GAD-7)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行测试。评估了这些变量之间的群体差异以及它们预测选择与非选择的能力。被选中的志愿者与未被选中的志愿者在sfas前的情绪和睡眠方面存在显著差异。被选中的候选人报告了更多的积极情绪(POMS活力,友好),更少的消极情绪(POMS抑郁,愤怒,疲劳,困惑),更少的愤怒(DAR)和更少的社会支持(Duke-SSQ)。入选的士兵比未入选的士兵睡眠时间更长,睡眠质量更高。这些差异不足以作为基于逻辑回归的准确预测模型,因为最佳拟合模型占方差的4.9%。综上所述,在一项选拔精英军事训练和服役个体的压力课程中,成功或失败的个体在课前情绪状态和睡眠方面存在差异,但它们不足以预测个体的成功或失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信