Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in patients with premature ejaculation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Firoozeh Raisi, Robabeh Soleimani, Azin Ahmadzadeh, Seyedeh Nasibeh Sadati, Arghavan Fakhrian, Mir Mohammad Jalali
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in patients with premature ejaculation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Firoozeh Raisi, Robabeh Soleimani, Azin Ahmadzadeh, Seyedeh Nasibeh Sadati, Arghavan Fakhrian, Mir Mohammad Jalali","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common male sexual dysfunction characterized by short ejaculatory latency with minimal stimulation, an inability to delay or control ejaculation, and distress or dissatisfaction due to the condition. Pharmacological therapy is central to PE management, with dapoxetine as the only approved selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Off-label options, including long-acting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (eg, paroxetine), topical anesthetics, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (eg, sildenafil), and tramadol, have also been explored. Despite numerous systematic reviews on its treatment, challenges remain due to methodological heterogeneity, variability in outcome measures, and inconsistencies in trial quality, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in prolonging intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and their safety by analyzing associated adverse events in adults with PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of SR-MAs ranging from 1990 to 2024 was performed. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed quality of previous SR-MAs using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and the risk of bias of RCTs using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome of interest was IELT. Effect sizes from primary studies of all SR-MAs were extracted, and after removing overlapping RCTs, a re-meta-analysis was conducted. We appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 44 SR-MAs covering 65 RCTs. Only two SR-MAs rated as moderate to high quality in the AMSTAR-2 assessment. Additionally, only six out of 65 RCTs had a low risk of bias. The median follow-up for included RCTs was 7.9 months. These treatments significantly improved IELT compared to placebo, with paroxetine achieving the largest mean difference (5.64 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.50 to 9.07). However, all pharmacological treatments were associated with adverse events, with paroxetine having the lowest risk (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.3), while risk ratios were higher for other treatments, including 4.1 for topical anesthetics, 2.4 for tramadol, and 1.8 for dapoxetine. Only topical anesthetics and paroxetine demonstrated a moderate to high rating in the GRADE assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical anesthetics, tramadol, and SSRIs significantly increase IELT. However, substantial heterogeneity among meta-analyses may limit the robustness of these findings. Future RCTs should include extended follow-up periods to better assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these treatments.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD 42024561480.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1014-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common male sexual dysfunction characterized by short ejaculatory latency with minimal stimulation, an inability to delay or control ejaculation, and distress or dissatisfaction due to the condition. Pharmacological therapy is central to PE management, with dapoxetine as the only approved selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Off-label options, including long-acting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (eg, paroxetine), topical anesthetics, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (eg, sildenafil), and tramadol, have also been explored. Despite numerous systematic reviews on its treatment, challenges remain due to methodological heterogeneity, variability in outcome measures, and inconsistencies in trial quality, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions.

Objectives: This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in prolonging intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and their safety by analyzing associated adverse events in adults with PE.

Methods: A comprehensive search of SR-MAs ranging from 1990 to 2024 was performed. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed quality of previous SR-MAs using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and the risk of bias of RCTs using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome of interest was IELT. Effect sizes from primary studies of all SR-MAs were extracted, and after removing overlapping RCTs, a re-meta-analysis was conducted. We appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system (GRADE).

Results: This review included 44 SR-MAs covering 65 RCTs. Only two SR-MAs rated as moderate to high quality in the AMSTAR-2 assessment. Additionally, only six out of 65 RCTs had a low risk of bias. The median follow-up for included RCTs was 7.9 months. These treatments significantly improved IELT compared to placebo, with paroxetine achieving the largest mean difference (5.64 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.50 to 9.07). However, all pharmacological treatments were associated with adverse events, with paroxetine having the lowest risk (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.3), while risk ratios were higher for other treatments, including 4.1 for topical anesthetics, 2.4 for tramadol, and 1.8 for dapoxetine. Only topical anesthetics and paroxetine demonstrated a moderate to high rating in the GRADE assessment.

Conclusion: Topical anesthetics, tramadol, and SSRIs significantly increase IELT. However, substantial heterogeneity among meta-analyses may limit the robustness of these findings. Future RCTs should include extended follow-up periods to better assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these treatments.

Prospero registration number: CRD 42024561480.

早泄患者药物治疗的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述。
早泄(PE)是一种常见的男性性功能障碍,其特征是射精潜伏期短,刺激最小,无法延迟或控制射精,并且由于这种情况而感到痛苦或不满。药物治疗是PE治疗的核心,达泊西汀是唯一被批准的选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)。说明书外选择,包括长效选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)(如帕罗西汀),局部麻醉剂,磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂(如西地那非)和曲马多,也进行了探索。尽管对其治疗进行了大量的系统评价,但由于方法学的异质性、结果测量的可变性和试验质量的不一致性,仍然存在挑战,因此难以得出可靠的结论。目的:本综述对随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析(SR-MAs)进行了综述,通过分析成人PE患者的相关不良事件,研究了药物治疗在延长阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)方面的疗效及其安全性。方法:综合检索1990 ~ 2024年的SR-MAs。两名审稿人独立筛选文章,提取数据,并使用A测量工具评估系统评价第2版(AMSTAR-2)工具评估以往sr - ma的质量,使用Cochrane随机试验的偏倚风险工具评估rct的偏倚风险。主要关注的结果是雅思。提取所有SR-MAs的主要研究的效应量,并在去除重叠的rct后进行重新荟萃分析。我们使用推荐评分、评估、发展和评估评分系统(GRADE)来评估证据的确定性。结果:本综述纳入44个SR-MAs,涵盖65个随机对照试验。只有两个sr - ma在AMSTAR-2评估中被评为中度至高质量。此外,65项随机对照试验中只有6项具有低偏倚风险。纳入的随机对照试验中位随访时间为7.9个月。与安慰剂相比,这些治疗显著改善了雅思成绩,帕罗西汀的平均差异最大(5.64分钟;95%置信区间[CI]: 3.50 ~ 9.07)。然而,所有药物治疗都与不良事件相关,帕罗西汀的风险最低(RR: 1.5;95% CI: 0.3 ~ 7.3),而其他治疗的风险比更高,包括局部麻醉剂4.1,曲马多2.4,达泊西汀1.8。只有局部麻醉剂和帕罗西汀在GRADE评估中表现出中等到高的评分。结论:局部麻醉剂、曲马多和SSRIs可显著提高雅思成绩。然而,meta分析之间的大量异质性可能会限制这些发现的稳健性。未来的随机对照试验应包括延长随访期,以更好地评估这些治疗的长期疗效和安全性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD 42024561480。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Journal of Sexual Medicine 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research. The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine. The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信