Yolanda Chavez, Sara Grineski, Daniel Adkins, Callie Avondet, Timothy Collins, Danielle Morales
{"title":"The Impact of Postgraduate Mentors on Undergraduate Researcher Gains.","authors":"Yolanda Chavez, Sara Grineski, Daniel Adkins, Callie Avondet, Timothy Collins, Danielle Morales","doi":"10.1187/cbe.24-05-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate researchers (UGRs) work under the direction of faculty mentors. Many also work with postgraduate mentors, either graduate students or postdoctoral personnel, but little is known about how these mentors shape student experiences. Using original survey data from 516 participants across 78 National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates Sites in Summer 2022, we find that 44% of students had a postgraduate mentor. Our multivariable multilevel analyses of UGRs with postgraduate mentors (<i>n</i> = 229) revealed that having a different gender identity than one's postgraduate mentor, having a competent postgraduate mentor, having a graduate student mentor, and spending more than 26 weekly hours with a postgraduate mentor were associated with greater science identity, personal, and intellectual gains. Matching with one's postgraduate mentor based on racial identity was associated with greater science identity gains. We also find that Hispanic and multiracial/other race students gained more compared with their White peers, and transgender and gender nonconforming students gained less compared with their men peers. Because the attributes and behaviors of postgraduate mentors are integral to undergraduate research experiences, analysts and practitioners should treat postgraduate mentorship as an essential part of the undergraduate research enterprise.</p>","PeriodicalId":56321,"journal":{"name":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","volume":"24 2","pages":"ar25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-05-0141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate researchers (UGRs) work under the direction of faculty mentors. Many also work with postgraduate mentors, either graduate students or postdoctoral personnel, but little is known about how these mentors shape student experiences. Using original survey data from 516 participants across 78 National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates Sites in Summer 2022, we find that 44% of students had a postgraduate mentor. Our multivariable multilevel analyses of UGRs with postgraduate mentors (n = 229) revealed that having a different gender identity than one's postgraduate mentor, having a competent postgraduate mentor, having a graduate student mentor, and spending more than 26 weekly hours with a postgraduate mentor were associated with greater science identity, personal, and intellectual gains. Matching with one's postgraduate mentor based on racial identity was associated with greater science identity gains. We also find that Hispanic and multiracial/other race students gained more compared with their White peers, and transgender and gender nonconforming students gained less compared with their men peers. Because the attributes and behaviors of postgraduate mentors are integral to undergraduate research experiences, analysts and practitioners should treat postgraduate mentorship as an essential part of the undergraduate research enterprise.
期刊介绍:
CBE—Life Sciences Education (LSE), a free, online quarterly journal, is published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The journal was launched in spring 2002 as Cell Biology Education—A Journal of Life Science Education. The ASCB changed the name of the journal in spring 2006 to better reflect the breadth of its readership and the scope of its submissions.
LSE publishes peer-reviewed articles on life science education at the K–12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. The ASCB believes that learning in biology encompasses diverse fields, including math, chemistry, physics, engineering, computer science, and the interdisciplinary intersections of biology with these fields. Within biology, LSE focuses on how students are introduced to the study of life sciences, as well as approaches in cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics.