Surgical consent, perception of the patients who underwent a surgical operation in the Kurdistan region, Iraq.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Dawan Jamal Hawezy
{"title":"Surgical consent, perception of the patients who underwent a surgical operation in the Kurdistan region, Iraq.","authors":"Dawan Jamal Hawezy","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01218-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient satisfaction is a significant measure of healthcare service quality as the patient is the center of any surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction refers to the extent to which a patient's expectations of optimal care align with their perception of the care received. Patient satisfaction during informed consent is enhanced when written informed consent is accompanied by verbal consent in the preoperative period. Satisfied patients are more inclined to adhere to therapy, engage actively in their care, utilize healthcare services, willingly partake in decision-making, and remain with a healthcare provider. This research examines the practical and ethical considerations of obtaining informed consent during surgical procedures. To better understand and make informed decisions, this study aims to assess the efficacy of present consent methods and pinpoint obstacles patients encounter.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to December 2024. Data were gathered by second-year students from Koya University's Faculty of General Medicine by interviewing postoperative patients who had undergone general surgical procedures. The results were entered into a Google form and analyzed using SPSS27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In interviews with participants, 430 out of 572 patients (75%) indicated trust in their surgeons performing the surgery, while 525 patients (91%) expressed respect for their surgeons' opinions. However, 41% (239 patients) reported not reading the informed consent form, and a similar percentage denied that the details of the form were explained by the medical staff responsible for the surgery as there are some medical terms or situations in the form that are challenging to assume if not explained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to others, participants with a higher educational level sought extensive time from the responsible surgeons to discuss every detail of the surgery before signing the informed consent, with a statistically significant difference observed. A similar difference was noted between private and public hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01218-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a significant measure of healthcare service quality as the patient is the center of any surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction refers to the extent to which a patient's expectations of optimal care align with their perception of the care received. Patient satisfaction during informed consent is enhanced when written informed consent is accompanied by verbal consent in the preoperative period. Satisfied patients are more inclined to adhere to therapy, engage actively in their care, utilize healthcare services, willingly partake in decision-making, and remain with a healthcare provider. This research examines the practical and ethical considerations of obtaining informed consent during surgical procedures. To better understand and make informed decisions, this study aims to assess the efficacy of present consent methods and pinpoint obstacles patients encounter.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to December 2024. Data were gathered by second-year students from Koya University's Faculty of General Medicine by interviewing postoperative patients who had undergone general surgical procedures. The results were entered into a Google form and analyzed using SPSS27.

Results: In interviews with participants, 430 out of 572 patients (75%) indicated trust in their surgeons performing the surgery, while 525 patients (91%) expressed respect for their surgeons' opinions. However, 41% (239 patients) reported not reading the informed consent form, and a similar percentage denied that the details of the form were explained by the medical staff responsible for the surgery as there are some medical terms or situations in the form that are challenging to assume if not explained.

Conclusion: Compared to others, participants with a higher educational level sought extensive time from the responsible surgeons to discuss every detail of the surgery before signing the informed consent, with a statistically significant difference observed. A similar difference was noted between private and public hospitals.

手术同意,在伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区接受外科手术的患者的看法。
患者满意度是衡量医疗服务质量的重要指标,因为患者是任何外科手术的中心。患者满意度是指患者对最佳护理的期望与他们对所接受护理的看法一致的程度。在知情同意期间,如果书面知情同意伴随着术前的口头同意,患者满意度会得到提高。满意的患者更倾向于坚持治疗,积极参与他们的护理,利用医疗保健服务,自愿参与决策,并继续与医疗保健提供者。本研究考察了在外科手术过程中获得知情同意的实践和伦理考虑。为了更好地理解和做出明智的决定,本研究旨在评估目前同意方法的有效性,并查明患者遇到的障碍。方法:横断面研究于2024年4月至12月进行。数据由Koya大学普通医学院的二年级学生通过采访接受过普通外科手术的术后患者收集。将结果输入谷歌表格,并使用SPSS27进行分析。结果:在与参与者的访谈中,572名患者中有430名(75%)表示信任他们的外科医生进行手术,而525名患者(91%)表示尊重他们的外科医生的意见。然而,41%(239名患者)报告没有阅读知情同意书,同样比例的患者否认负责手术的医务人员解释了表格的细节,因为表格中有一些医学术语或情况,如果没有解释,就很难假设。结论:与其他患者相比,受教育程度较高的患者在签署知情同意书前,与负责的外科医生讨论手术的每一个细节的时间较长,差异有统计学意义。私立医院和公立医院之间也存在类似的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信