Meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yi-Ting Lu, Xin Zhang, Jun Cheng
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Yi-Ting Lu, Xin Zhang, Jun Cheng","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.102542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no effective treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and pharmacological treatment of AD in clinical settings is expensive and prolonged, resulting in a huge psychological and economic burden on the patient's family and caregivers and society as a whole, AD is characterized by progressive, worsening cognitive impairment, and there are currently no drugs that can effectively reverse cognitive impairment. However, it is important to intervene early or delay cognitive impairment so that the condition can be delayed and, ultimately, the burden on patients and families can be reduced through maintenance treatment. It may be that non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) can help with cognitive dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide a better treatment plan for AD patients and delay the deterioration of cognitive function, the effect of CST on cognitive function in AD was studied by Meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive search the Chinese and English databases were comprehensively searched by computer. Chinese databases: China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China Periodicals Full-text Database (CNKI). The collection time limit is from July 21, 2010 to July 21, 2022 randomized controlled trials literature on the effects of CST on cognitive function in patients with AD. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were performed. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used as evaluation criteria to evaluate the cognitive function of CST in AD patients. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were performed on the results. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, and funnel plot symmetry was assessed with Eggr's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CST can not improve Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE) scores in AD patients. Meta-analysis of CST on MMSE scores showed that the heterogeneity was <i>P</i> = 0.14, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 35%. <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 35% < 50%, and the <i>Q</i> test <i>P</i> > 0.1, choose the random effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.42, <i>P</i> > 0.05. Meta-analysis of CST on AD Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale scores showed that the heterogeneity was <i>P</i> = 0.13, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 36%. <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 36% < 50 choose a fixed effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.40, 0.39, <i>P</i> > 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant. Meta-analysis of CST on the cognitive function indicators of patients showed that the heterogeneity was <i>P</i> = 0.17, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31%. <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31% < 50%, the fixed effect model showed SMD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.38, <i>P</i> > 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CST may not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the ability of daily living, and not reduce mental behavior can improve the cognitive function of AD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 4","pages":"102542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.102542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no effective treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and pharmacological treatment of AD in clinical settings is expensive and prolonged, resulting in a huge psychological and economic burden on the patient's family and caregivers and society as a whole, AD is characterized by progressive, worsening cognitive impairment, and there are currently no drugs that can effectively reverse cognitive impairment. However, it is important to intervene early or delay cognitive impairment so that the condition can be delayed and, ultimately, the burden on patients and families can be reduced through maintenance treatment. It may be that non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) can help with cognitive dysfunction.

Aim: To provide a better treatment plan for AD patients and delay the deterioration of cognitive function, the effect of CST on cognitive function in AD was studied by Meta-analysis.

Methods: Comprehensive search the Chinese and English databases were comprehensively searched by computer. Chinese databases: China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China Periodicals Full-text Database (CNKI). The collection time limit is from July 21, 2010 to July 21, 2022 randomized controlled trials literature on the effects of CST on cognitive function in patients with AD. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were performed. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used as evaluation criteria to evaluate the cognitive function of CST in AD patients. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were performed on the results. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, and funnel plot symmetry was assessed with Eggr's test.

Results: CST can not improve Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE) scores in AD patients. Meta-analysis of CST on MMSE scores showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.14, I 2 = 35%. I 2 = 35% < 50%, and the Q test P > 0.1, choose the random effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.42, P > 0.05. Meta-analysis of CST on AD Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale scores showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.13, I 2 = 36%. I 2 = 36% < 50 choose a fixed effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.40, 0.39, P > 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant. Meta-analysis of CST on the cognitive function indicators of patients showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.17, I 2 = 31%. I 2 = 31% < 50%, the fixed effect model showed SMD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.38, P > 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: CST may not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the ability of daily living, and not reduce mental behavior can improve the cognitive function of AD patients.

认知刺激疗法对阿尔茨海默病患者认知功能影响的meta分析。
背景:阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer's disease, AD)目前尚无有效的治疗方法,临床对AD的药物治疗费用昂贵且时间长,给患者家属、照顾者和整个社会带来巨大的心理和经济负担,AD具有进行性、加重性认知功能障碍的特点,目前还没有能够有效逆转认知功能障碍的药物。然而,早期干预或延迟认知障碍是很重要的,这样可以延迟病情,并最终通过维持治疗减轻患者和家庭的负担。这可能是非药物干预,如认知刺激疗法(CST)可以帮助认知功能障碍。目的:通过meta分析研究CST对AD患者认知功能的影响,为AD患者提供更好的治疗方案,延缓认知功能的恶化。方法:综合检索采用计算机综合检索中英文数据库。中文数据库:中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库、VIP数据库、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)。收集时间限制为2010年7月21日至2022年7月21日,关于CST对AD患者认知功能影响的随机对照试验文献。按照纳入和排除标准进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评价。采用标准化平均差(SMD)和95%CI作为评价标准评价AD患者CST认知功能。对结果进行敏感性分析和发表偏倚检测。采用漏斗图评估发表偏倚,采用Eggr检验评估漏斗图对称性。结果:CST不能提高AD患者精神状态检查量表(MMSE)得分。CST对MMSE评分的meta分析显示,异质性P = 0.14, i2 = 35%。I 2 = 35% < 50%,且Q检验P > 0.1,选择随机效应模型进行统计整合,得到SMD = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.42, P > 0.05。CST对AD认知功能评估量表得分的meta分析显示,异质性P = 0.13, i2 = 36%。I 2 = 36% < 50选择固定效应模型进行统计整合,得到SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.40, 0.39, P > 0.05,差异无统计学意义。CST对患者认知功能指标的meta分析显示,异质性P = 0.17, i2 = 31%。I 2 = 31% < 50%,固定效应模型显示SMD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.38, P > 0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论:CST可能不能改善AD患者的认知功能,不能改善AD患者的认知功能,不能改善日常生活能力,不能减少心理行为,不能改善AD患者的认知功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信