Willingness to pay and preferences for mindfulness-based interventions among patients with chronic low back pain in the Hong Kong public healthcare sector.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hong Kong Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.12809/hkmj2311445
M Zhu, P K H Mo, K Wang, H H M Lo, Y K Choi, S W Law, R W S Sit
{"title":"Willingness to pay and preferences for mindfulness-based interventions among patients with chronic low back pain in the Hong Kong public healthcare sector.","authors":"M Zhu, P K H Mo, K Wang, H H M Lo, Y K Choi, S W Law, R W S Sit","doi":"10.12809/hkmj2311445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are effective for LBP management when combined with medication and physical therapy. An understanding of patients' willingness to pay (WTP) and preferences is needed to integrate MBIs into standard LBP care. We examined WTP and preferences for MBIs, as well as associated factors, among patients with chronic LBP in the Hong Kong public healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two Hong Kong public hospitals. We used the payment card method to assess patients' WTP for MBIs and performed a discrete choice experiment to examine patients' preferences for MBIs. Tobit regression was utilised to analyse factors associated with WTP for MBIs. Patients' relative preferences for MBIs were estimated through a mixed logit model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean WTP for an eight-session course of MBIs was HK$258.75±508.11. Higher pain scores, monthly family income >HK$30 000, high school education, higher treatment expenses, and stronger belief in MBIs were associated with greater WTP. Patients were more likely to choose MBIs with lower costs, greater improvements in pain relief and the ability to perform daily activities, and a face-to-face delivery mode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with chronic LBP exhibited low WTP for MBIs. Strategies to improve education and awareness may enhance WTP; affordability and accessibility should be considered for individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The identified preferences provide insights for designing MBIs that align with patient needs. These findings offer valuable methodological references for other healthcare evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48828,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","volume":"31 2","pages":"108-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2311445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are effective for LBP management when combined with medication and physical therapy. An understanding of patients' willingness to pay (WTP) and preferences is needed to integrate MBIs into standard LBP care. We examined WTP and preferences for MBIs, as well as associated factors, among patients with chronic LBP in the Hong Kong public healthcare sector.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two Hong Kong public hospitals. We used the payment card method to assess patients' WTP for MBIs and performed a discrete choice experiment to examine patients' preferences for MBIs. Tobit regression was utilised to analyse factors associated with WTP for MBIs. Patients' relative preferences for MBIs were estimated through a mixed logit model.

Results: Mean WTP for an eight-session course of MBIs was HK$258.75±508.11. Higher pain scores, monthly family income >HK$30 000, high school education, higher treatment expenses, and stronger belief in MBIs were associated with greater WTP. Patients were more likely to choose MBIs with lower costs, greater improvements in pain relief and the ability to perform daily activities, and a face-to-face delivery mode.

Conclusion: Patients with chronic LBP exhibited low WTP for MBIs. Strategies to improve education and awareness may enhance WTP; affordability and accessibility should be considered for individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The identified preferences provide insights for designing MBIs that align with patient needs. These findings offer valuable methodological references for other healthcare evaluations.

香港公共医疗部门慢性腰痛患者对正念干预的支付意愿和偏好
简介:腰痛(LBP)是世界范围内致残的主要原因。正念干预(MBIs)是有效的LBP管理时,结合药物和物理治疗。了解患者的支付意愿(WTP)和偏好是将mbi纳入标准LBP护理的必要条件。我们调查了香港公共医疗部门慢性腰痛患者的WTP和对MBIs的偏好,以及相关因素。方法:对香港两所公立医院进行横断面调查。我们采用支付卡的方法来评估患者对mbi的WTP,并进行离散选择实验来检验患者对mbi的偏好。采用Tobit回归分析与mbi患者WTP相关的因素。通过混合logit模型估计患者对mbi的相对偏好。结果:8期mbi疗程的平均WTP为258.75±508.11港元。较高的疼痛评分、家庭月收入在3万港元以上、高中教育程度、较高的治疗费用和对mbi的信念较强与较高的WTP有关。患者更有可能选择成本更低、在缓解疼痛和日常活动能力方面有更大改善的mbi,以及面对面的交付模式。结论:慢性腰痛患者表现为低WTP。提高教育和意识的策略可以提高WTP;应考虑来自不同社会经济背景的个人的负担能力和可及性。确定的偏好为设计符合患者需求的mbi提供了见解。这些发现为其他医疗保健评估提供了有价值的方法参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hong Kong Medical Journal
Hong Kong Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The HKMJ is a Hong Kong-based, peer-reviewed, general medical journal which is circulated to 6000 readers, including all members of the HKMA and Fellows of the HKAM. The HKMJ publishes original research papers, review articles, medical practice papers, case reports, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, and letters to the Editor. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to clinical practice and research in all branches of medicine. The HKMJ welcomes manuscripts from authors, but usually solicits reviews. Proposals for review papers can be sent to the Managing Editor directly. Please refer to the contact information of the Editorial Office.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信