Efficacy assessment of repeat iodine-131 treatment in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma assessed as biochemical incomplete response.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zilin Wang, Chenghui Lu, Yihan Tian, Shiqi Wen, Meijing Huang, Congcong Wang, Xufu Wang, Fuxin Li, Wei Li, Yanhui Ji
{"title":"Efficacy assessment of repeat iodine-131 treatment in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma assessed as biochemical incomplete response.","authors":"Zilin Wang, Chenghui Lu, Yihan Tian, Shiqi Wen, Meijing Huang, Congcong Wang, Xufu Wang, Fuxin Li, Wei Li, Yanhui Ji","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04232-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although most patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) have a favorable prognosis, some continue to have elevated serum Thyroglobulin (Tg) levels after surgery and ¹³¹I treatment, classified as a Biochemical Incomplete Response (BIR). According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, 20% of these patients will develop a Structural Incomplete Response (SIR). Doctors often recommend ¹³¹I retreatment without imaging evidence, hoping for benefits. However, the effectiveness of this treatment strategy is still not supported by evidence. The aim of this study is to explore the potential benefits by comparing Tg levels and their changes in patients who were retreated with <sup>131</sup>I and combining them with the results of follow-up assessment using Dynamic Risk Stratification (DRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study collected clinical data from patients with PTC who underwent ¹³¹I therapy after surgery at two medical centers. All of them were evaluated for Biochemical Incomplete Response (BIR) after initial treatment. Based on whether they received ¹³¹I retreatment, they were divided into two groups: the retreatment group and the no-retreatment group. Our primary outcome measures included basic clinical data, suppressed Tg, change in Tg levels, and DRS stratification at the last follow-up. The potential benefits of ¹³¹I retreatment were analyzed by comparing the changes in Tg levels and the DRS distribution at the end of follow-up between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with PTC assessed for BIR after initial therapy showed a greater reduction in Tg at short-term follow-up after ¹³¹I retreatment compared to the no retreatment group (0.84 ng/mL vs. 0.72 ng/mL). The one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test results were T = 6.001, p < 0.001 and T = 1.378, p = 0.168, respectively. At the end of follow-up, this treatment did not alter the DRS strata composition ratio (R = 3.06, p = 0.39). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin (Ps-Tg) predicting non-remission status was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.73), with the highest Youden index (0.26) at a Ps-Tg cutoff of 20.5 ng/mL, corresponding to a sensitivity of 62.6% and a specificity of 63.3%. For the first suppressed Tg (sup-Tg) predicting non-remission, the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.84). The highest Youden index (0.40) was achieved at a sup-Tg cutoff of 1.85 ng/mL, corresponding to a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 70.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with PTC who received <sup>131</sup>I therapy after surgery and are classified as BIR, <sup>131</sup>I retreatment may accelerate the decline in Tg levels over time but does not change the DRS distribution. Only few of patients have structural and/or functional lesions detected on the whole-body scan after <sup>131</sup>I retreatment. The Ps-Tg and first sup-Tg values after the first ¹³¹I treatment can help predict a non-remission state, with cutoff values of 20.5 ng/mL and 1.85 ng/mL, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04232-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although most patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) have a favorable prognosis, some continue to have elevated serum Thyroglobulin (Tg) levels after surgery and ¹³¹I treatment, classified as a Biochemical Incomplete Response (BIR). According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, 20% of these patients will develop a Structural Incomplete Response (SIR). Doctors often recommend ¹³¹I retreatment without imaging evidence, hoping for benefits. However, the effectiveness of this treatment strategy is still not supported by evidence. The aim of this study is to explore the potential benefits by comparing Tg levels and their changes in patients who were retreated with 131I and combining them with the results of follow-up assessment using Dynamic Risk Stratification (DRS).

Methods: This retrospective study collected clinical data from patients with PTC who underwent ¹³¹I therapy after surgery at two medical centers. All of them were evaluated for Biochemical Incomplete Response (BIR) after initial treatment. Based on whether they received ¹³¹I retreatment, they were divided into two groups: the retreatment group and the no-retreatment group. Our primary outcome measures included basic clinical data, suppressed Tg, change in Tg levels, and DRS stratification at the last follow-up. The potential benefits of ¹³¹I retreatment were analyzed by comparing the changes in Tg levels and the DRS distribution at the end of follow-up between the two groups.

Results: Patients with PTC assessed for BIR after initial therapy showed a greater reduction in Tg at short-term follow-up after ¹³¹I retreatment compared to the no retreatment group (0.84 ng/mL vs. 0.72 ng/mL). The one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test results were T = 6.001, p < 0.001 and T = 1.378, p = 0.168, respectively. At the end of follow-up, this treatment did not alter the DRS strata composition ratio (R = 3.06, p = 0.39). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin (Ps-Tg) predicting non-remission status was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.73), with the highest Youden index (0.26) at a Ps-Tg cutoff of 20.5 ng/mL, corresponding to a sensitivity of 62.6% and a specificity of 63.3%. For the first suppressed Tg (sup-Tg) predicting non-remission, the AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.84). The highest Youden index (0.40) was achieved at a sup-Tg cutoff of 1.85 ng/mL, corresponding to a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 70.8%.

Conclusion: For patients with PTC who received 131I therapy after surgery and are classified as BIR, 131I retreatment may accelerate the decline in Tg levels over time but does not change the DRS distribution. Only few of patients have structural and/or functional lesions detected on the whole-body scan after 131I retreatment. The Ps-Tg and first sup-Tg values after the first ¹³¹I treatment can help predict a non-remission state, with cutoff values of 20.5 ng/mL and 1.85 ng/mL, respectively.

生化不完全缓解的甲状腺乳头状癌重复碘-131治疗的疗效评价。
目的:虽然大多数甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者预后良好,但一些患者在手术和治疗后血清甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)水平继续升高,归类为生化不完全缓解(BIR)。根据2015年美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南,这些患者中有20%会出现结构性不完全缓解(SIR)。医生经常建议在没有影像学证据的情况下进行再治疗,希望从中受益。然而,这种治疗策略的有效性仍然没有证据支持。本研究的目的是通过比较服用131I的患者Tg水平及其变化,并将其与动态风险分层(DRS)随访评估结果相结合,探讨其潜在的益处。方法:本回顾性研究收集了两家医疗中心术后接受1³1治疗的PTC患者的临床资料。初始治疗后进行生化不完全缓解(BIR)评价。根据患者是否接受过¹³¹I再治疗分为再治疗组和未再治疗组。我们的主要结局指标包括基本临床数据、抑制Tg、Tg水平变化和最后一次随访时的DRS分层。通过比较两组患者随访结束时Tg水平变化和DRS分布,分析¹³¹I再治疗的潜在益处。结果:初始治疗后评估BIR的PTC患者在再治疗后的短期随访中,与未再治疗组相比,Tg下降幅度更大(0.84 ng/mL vs. 0.72 ng/mL)。单样本Wilcoxon sign -rank检验结果为T = 6.001, p结论:对于术后接受131I治疗并归类为BIR的PTC患者,131I再治疗可能会随着时间的推移加速Tg水平的下降,但不会改变DRS分布。只有少数患者在131I再治疗后全身扫描发现结构和/或功能病变。第一次¹³¹I治疗后的Ps-Tg和第一次sup-Tg值可以帮助预测非缓解状态,临界值分别为20.5 ng/mL和1.85 ng/mL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信