User evaluations of a Dementia case management information system: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yu-Chen Hu, Yi-Ping Chao, Hsiu-Li Huang, Wen-Chuin Hsu, Yea-Ing L Shyu, Yen-Ting Liao, Huei-Ling Huang
{"title":"User evaluations of a Dementia case management information system: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yu-Chen Hu, Yi-Ping Chao, Hsiu-Li Huang, Wen-Chuin Hsu, Yea-Ing L Shyu, Yen-Ting Liao, Huei-Ling Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.04.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the acceptability of a recently developed electronic Dementia Case Management Information System (DCMIS) following hands-on use by dementia case managers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dementia case managers from 28 community-based dementia care centers who had previously provided feedback about needs and wants of an electronic case management system were invited to participate (N =30). Following a training session, participants used the DCMIS to assess patients in two scenarios typical for case managers at our centers. Participants then evaluated their experience with a researcher-developed 25-item Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire (scored from 1 to 5). Multiple linear regression analysis examined significant associations between technology acceptance and variables of demographics and external factors (system quality and information, and job relevance) to identify predictors of acceptance of the DCMIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acceptance and perceived usefulness of the DCMIS were high; mean scores were 4.05 (SD,0.62) and 4.15 (SD, 0.67), respectively. Job relevance was a significant predictor of perceived usefulness (β = 0.721, P <.001). System quality and information quality were significant predictors of perceived ease of use (β = 0.355, P =.03 and β = 0.395, P =.02, respectively); job relevance was also a predictor for behavioral intention to use (β = 0.487, P =.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative assessments of the DCMIS by the dementia case managers demonstrated most found the system to be useful. Factors that were predictors of acceptance suggest that the ability to easily access quality information and improved the ability of dementia case managers to perform their jobs contributed their willingness to view the DCMIS as a tool that could enhance workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"103354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.04.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the acceptability of a recently developed electronic Dementia Case Management Information System (DCMIS) following hands-on use by dementia case managers.

Methods: Dementia case managers from 28 community-based dementia care centers who had previously provided feedback about needs and wants of an electronic case management system were invited to participate (N =30). Following a training session, participants used the DCMIS to assess patients in two scenarios typical for case managers at our centers. Participants then evaluated their experience with a researcher-developed 25-item Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire (scored from 1 to 5). Multiple linear regression analysis examined significant associations between technology acceptance and variables of demographics and external factors (system quality and information, and job relevance) to identify predictors of acceptance of the DCMIS.

Results: Acceptance and perceived usefulness of the DCMIS were high; mean scores were 4.05 (SD,0.62) and 4.15 (SD, 0.67), respectively. Job relevance was a significant predictor of perceived usefulness (β = 0.721, P <.001). System quality and information quality were significant predictors of perceived ease of use (β = 0.355, P =.03 and β = 0.395, P =.02, respectively); job relevance was also a predictor for behavioral intention to use (β = 0.487, P =.03).

Conclusions: The quantitative assessments of the DCMIS by the dementia case managers demonstrated most found the system to be useful. Factors that were predictors of acceptance suggest that the ability to easily access quality information and improved the ability of dementia case managers to perform their jobs contributed their willingness to view the DCMIS as a tool that could enhance workflow.

痴呆病例管理信息系统的用户评价:一项横断面研究。
目的:评估最近开发的电子痴呆病例管理信息系统(DCMIS)在痴呆病例管理人员实际使用后的可接受性。方法:邀请来自28个社区痴呆症护理中心的痴呆症病例管理人员参与(N =30),他们之前曾就电子病例管理系统的需求和愿望提供反馈。在培训课程之后,参与者使用DCMIS在我们中心的病例管理人员的两种典型情况下评估患者。然后参与者用研究人员开发的25项技术接受模型问卷(得分从1到5)来评估他们的经历。多元线性回归分析检验了技术接受度与人口统计学变量和外部因素(系统质量和信息,以及工作相关性)之间的显著关联,以确定DCMIS接受度的预测因子。结果:DCMIS的接受度和感知有用性较高;平均评分分别为4.05 (SD,0.62)和4.15 (SD, 0.67)。工作相关性是感知有用性的显著预测因子(β = 0.721, P)。结论:痴呆病例管理人员对DCMIS的定量评估表明,大多数人认为该系统有用。预测接受度的因素表明,容易获得高质量信息的能力和提高痴呆症病例管理人员执行工作的能力,促使他们愿意将DCMIS视为一种可以增强工作流程的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信