Two-site trabeculotomy versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma: a randomized prospective study.

Q2 Medicine
Reem M Aboulhassan, Yasmine M ElSayed, Amanne Esmael, Ghada Gawdat, Ahmed ElKateb, Hala ElHilali
{"title":"Two-site trabeculotomy versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma: a randomized prospective study.","authors":"Reem M Aboulhassan, Yasmine M ElSayed, Amanne Esmael, Ghada Gawdat, Ahmed ElKateb, Hala ElHilali","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of two-site rigid-probe trabeculotomy (RPT) compared to gonioscopy assisted two-site trabeculotomy (GATT) in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled study SUBJECTS: The study included 77 eyes of 60 PCG patients with clear corneas all aged <5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to undergo either two-site trabeculotomy using a rigid probe or GATT using a 5/0 polypropylene suture. Success was defined as achieving a final intraocular pressure (IOP) <18 mmHg without (complete) or with medications (qualified).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were reduction of IOP and medications. Secondary outcomes were complications and success rates. Anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) was performed to compare changes in angle morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-site RPT group included 39 eyes, and the GATT group included 38 eyes. There was a significant reduction in IOP and glaucoma medications at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively in both groups (p<0.001) with no significant difference in IOP or glaucoma medications between both groups at any follow-up. At the final follow-up, there was a 49% ± 13% IOP reduction in the two-site RPT trabeculotomy group compared to 44% ± 25% in the GATT group (p=0.2). Success was achieved in all eyes in the RPT group and in 95% in the GATT group. Hyphema was the most frequently observed complication; with no vision-threatening complications in either group. Post-operative AS-OCT findings included angle widening, trabecular shelf, and peripheral anterior synechia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circumferential trabeculotomy using ab-interno GATT or ab-externo two-site trabeculotomy yielded comparable results in terms of safety and efficacy. GATT has the advantage of sparing the conjunctiva which may be needed for future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.04.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of two-site rigid-probe trabeculotomy (RPT) compared to gonioscopy assisted two-site trabeculotomy (GATT) in the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).

Design: A prospective randomized controlled study SUBJECTS: The study included 77 eyes of 60 PCG patients with clear corneas all aged <5 years.

Methods: Patients were randomized to undergo either two-site trabeculotomy using a rigid probe or GATT using a 5/0 polypropylene suture. Success was defined as achieving a final intraocular pressure (IOP) <18 mmHg without (complete) or with medications (qualified).

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were reduction of IOP and medications. Secondary outcomes were complications and success rates. Anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) was performed to compare changes in angle morphology.

Results: The two-site RPT group included 39 eyes, and the GATT group included 38 eyes. There was a significant reduction in IOP and glaucoma medications at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively in both groups (p<0.001) with no significant difference in IOP or glaucoma medications between both groups at any follow-up. At the final follow-up, there was a 49% ± 13% IOP reduction in the two-site RPT trabeculotomy group compared to 44% ± 25% in the GATT group (p=0.2). Success was achieved in all eyes in the RPT group and in 95% in the GATT group. Hyphema was the most frequently observed complication; with no vision-threatening complications in either group. Post-operative AS-OCT findings included angle widening, trabecular shelf, and peripheral anterior synechia.

Conclusion: Circumferential trabeculotomy using ab-interno GATT or ab-externo two-site trabeculotomy yielded comparable results in terms of safety and efficacy. GATT has the advantage of sparing the conjunctiva which may be needed for future interventions.

两处小梁切开术与腔内镜检辅助下小梁切开术治疗原发性先天性青光眼:一项随机前瞻性研究。
目的:本研究的目的是比较两个部位硬探针小梁切开术(RPT)与角镜辅助的两个部位小梁切开术(GATT)治疗原发性先天性青光眼(PCG)的效果。设计:前瞻性随机对照研究对象:该研究包括60例年龄均为透明角膜的PCG患者的77只眼。方法:患者随机分为两组,一组采用刚性探针进行双侧小梁切开术,另一组采用5/0聚丙烯缝线进行GATT。成功定义为达到最终眼压(IOP)。主要结果测量:主要结果是眼压降低和药物治疗。次要结果是并发症和成功率。前段OCT (AS-OCT)比较角度形态的变化。结果:两部位RPT组39眼,GATT组38眼。两组患者术后1、3、6、9和12个月的IOP和青光眼用药均显著减少(结论:采用ab-interno GATT或ab-externo两部位小梁切开术的环周小梁切开术在安全性和有效性方面具有可比性。GATT的优点是保留结膜,这可能是未来干预所需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信