Preferential impact of processing speed and memory on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised embedded performance validity tests.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
George Whitman Kent, John-Christopher A Finley, Mira I Leese, Tyler J Kukla, Hajar Ismail, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble, Matthew S Phillips
{"title":"Preferential impact of processing speed and memory on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised embedded performance validity tests.","authors":"George Whitman Kent, John-Christopher A Finley, Mira I Leese, Tyler J Kukla, Hajar Ismail, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble, Matthew S Phillips","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of single-domain impairment in processing speed and memory versus multidomain impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (RAVLT FC) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Discrimination (BVMT-R RD) PVTs among a sample of 385 nonconsecutive mixed clinical patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. The sample was dichotomized to form valid (<i>n</i> = 307) and invalid (<i>n</i> = 78) groups. The valid study group was subdivided into an intact cognition group (<i>n</i> = 174), single-domain processing speed (<i>n</i> = 27) and memory (<i>n</i> = 59) groups, and a combined speed and memory impairment group (<i>n</i> = 47). The impaired memory group showed acceptable classification accuracy for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/90% specificity). The impaired speed group evidenced excellent classification for the RAVLT FC (≤14; 64% sensitivity/96% specificity) and acceptable accuracy for the BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/96% specificity). For the impaired speed and memory group, classification accuracy was acceptable for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/92% specificity) and poor (although still statistically significant) for the BVMT RD (≤3; 24% sensitivity/94% specificity). Therefore, use of adjusted cut-scores among neuropsychological conditions associated with deficits in memory and/or speed is needed when using these PVTs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of single-domain impairment in processing speed and memory versus multidomain impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (RAVLT FC) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Discrimination (BVMT-R RD) PVTs among a sample of 385 nonconsecutive mixed clinical patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. The sample was dichotomized to form valid (n = 307) and invalid (n = 78) groups. The valid study group was subdivided into an intact cognition group (n = 174), single-domain processing speed (n = 27) and memory (n = 59) groups, and a combined speed and memory impairment group (n = 47). The impaired memory group showed acceptable classification accuracy for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/90% specificity). The impaired speed group evidenced excellent classification for the RAVLT FC (≤14; 64% sensitivity/96% specificity) and acceptable accuracy for the BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/96% specificity). For the impaired speed and memory group, classification accuracy was acceptable for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/92% specificity) and poor (although still statistically significant) for the BVMT RD (≤3; 24% sensitivity/94% specificity). Therefore, use of adjusted cut-scores among neuropsychological conditions associated with deficits in memory and/or speed is needed when using these PVTs in clinical practice.

加工速度和记忆对Rey听觉语言学习测验和简短视觉空间记忆测验修正嵌入效度测验的优先影响。
本研究对385例门诊神经心理评估的非连续混合临床患者样本进行了研究,评估了加工速度和记忆的单域损伤与多域损伤对Rey听觉语言学习测试强迫选择(RAVLT FC)和简短视觉空间记忆测试修正识别辨别(BVMT-R RD) pts的影响。将样本分为有效组(n = 307)和无效组(n = 78)。有效研究组又分为完整认知组(n = 174)、单域处理速度组(n = 27)和记忆组(n = 59)以及速度和记忆联合损伤组(n = 47)。记忆受损组对RAVLT FC的分类准确率可接受(≤12;35%敏感性/90%特异性)和BVMT RD(≤4;33%敏感性/90%特异性)。速度受损组的RAVLT FC分级非常好(≤14;64%的敏感性/96%的特异性)和可接受的准确性BVMT RD(≤4;33%敏感性/96%特异性)。对于速度和记忆受损组,RAVLT FC的分类准确率是可以接受的(≤12;35%敏感性/92%特异性)和BVMT RD较差(尽管仍具有统计学意义)(≤3;24%敏感性/94%特异性)。因此,在临床实践中使用这些pvt时,需要在与记忆和/或速度缺陷相关的神经心理状况中使用调整后的分值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信