Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Semi-Automated and Automated Acoustic Quantification of Vocal Tremor Characteristics.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Youri Maryn, Kaitlyn Dwenger, Sidney Kaufmann, Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer
{"title":"Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Semi-Automated and Automated Acoustic Quantification of Vocal Tremor Characteristics.","authors":"Youri Maryn, Kaitlyn Dwenger, Sidney Kaufmann, Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared three methods of acoustic algorithm-supported extraction and analysis of vocal tremor properties (i.e., rate, extent, and regularity of intensity level and fundamental frequency modulation): (a) visual perception and manual data extraction, (b) semi-automated data extraction, and (c) fully automated data extraction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-five midvowel sustained [a:] and [i:] audio recordings were collected as part of a scientific project to learn about the physiologic substrates of vocal tremor. This convenience data set contained vowels with a representative variety in vocal tremor severity. First, the vocal tremor properties in intensity level and fundamental frequency tracks were visually inspected and manually measured using Praat software. Second, the vocal tremor properties were determined using two Praat scripts: automated with the script of Maryn et al. (2019) and semi-automated with an adjusted version of this script to enable the user to intervene with the signal processing. The reliability of manual vocal tremor property measurement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The properties as measured with the two scripts (automated vs. semi-automated) were compared with the manually determined properties using correlation and diagnostic accuracy statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With intraclass correlation coefficients between .770 and .914, the reliability of the manual method was acceptable. The semi-automated method correlated with manual property measures better and was more accurate in diagnosing vocal tremor than the automated method.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Manual acoustic measurement of vocal tremor properties can be laborious and time-consuming. Automated or semi-automated acoustic methods may improve efficiency in vocal tremor property measurement in clinical as well as research settings. Although both Praat script-supported methods in this study yielded acceptable validity with the manual data measurements as a referent, the semi-automated method showed the best outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28873088.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"2721-2740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared three methods of acoustic algorithm-supported extraction and analysis of vocal tremor properties (i.e., rate, extent, and regularity of intensity level and fundamental frequency modulation): (a) visual perception and manual data extraction, (b) semi-automated data extraction, and (c) fully automated data extraction.

Method: Forty-five midvowel sustained [a:] and [i:] audio recordings were collected as part of a scientific project to learn about the physiologic substrates of vocal tremor. This convenience data set contained vowels with a representative variety in vocal tremor severity. First, the vocal tremor properties in intensity level and fundamental frequency tracks were visually inspected and manually measured using Praat software. Second, the vocal tremor properties were determined using two Praat scripts: automated with the script of Maryn et al. (2019) and semi-automated with an adjusted version of this script to enable the user to intervene with the signal processing. The reliability of manual vocal tremor property measurement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The properties as measured with the two scripts (automated vs. semi-automated) were compared with the manually determined properties using correlation and diagnostic accuracy statistical methods.

Results: With intraclass correlation coefficients between .770 and .914, the reliability of the manual method was acceptable. The semi-automated method correlated with manual property measures better and was more accurate in diagnosing vocal tremor than the automated method.

Discussion: Manual acoustic measurement of vocal tremor properties can be laborious and time-consuming. Automated or semi-automated acoustic methods may improve efficiency in vocal tremor property measurement in clinical as well as research settings. Although both Praat script-supported methods in this study yielded acceptable validity with the manual data measurements as a referent, the semi-automated method showed the best outcomes.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28873088.

半自动化和自动化声量化声带震颤特征的可靠性和诊断准确性。
目的:本研究比较了三种声学算法支持的声音震颤特性(即强度水平和基频调制的频率、程度和规律性)的提取和分析方法:(a)视觉感知和人工数据提取,(b)半自动数据提取,(c)全自动数据提取。方法:作为一个科学项目的一部分,收集了45段中音持续[a:]和[i:]录音,以了解声带震颤的生理基础。这个方便的数据集包含元音在声带震颤的严重程度具有代表性的变化。首先,使用Praat软件目视检查和手动测量强度水平和基频轨道的声带震颤特性。其次,使用两种Praat脚本确定声音震颤特性:使用Maryn等人(2019)的脚本进行自动化测试,使用该脚本的调整版本进行半自动测试,使用户能够干预信号处理。用类内相关系数评价人工声带震颤特性测量的可靠性。使用相关性和诊断准确性统计方法,将使用两个脚本(自动化与半自动)测量的属性与手动确定的属性进行比较。结果:手工方法的类内相关系数为0.770 ~ 0.914,信度可接受。半自动化方法与人工测量的相关性较好,诊断声带震颤的准确度高于自动化方法。讨论:人工声学测量声带震颤特性既费力又耗时。自动化或半自动声学方法可以提高临床和研究环境中声带震颤特性测量的效率。尽管在本研究中,两种Praat脚本支持的方法都以人工数据测量为参照,产生了可接受的效度,但半自动方法显示出最好的结果。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28873088。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书