Optimal Seed Size under Mixed Mating Systems When Predispersal and Postdispersal Inbreeding Depression Is Decoupled.

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1086/735011
Qiaoqiao Huang
{"title":"Optimal Seed Size under Mixed Mating Systems When Predispersal and Postdispersal Inbreeding Depression Is Decoupled.","authors":"Qiaoqiao Huang","doi":"10.1086/735011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractInbreeding depression (ID) has different components, and how these affect selection on seed size is currently unknown. Using an optimality model, I find that when pollen limitation selects for mixed mating systems, increased predispersal ID (abortion of selfed ovules) increases the optimal sizes of both selfed and outcrossed seeds, whereas increased seed size-independent postdispersal ID (reduced survival of selfed seeds) only increases the size of outcrossed seeds. The effect of decreased efficiency of maternal investment in selfed seeds depends on details of the model assumptions, but in many cases it will increase resource allocation to both types of seeds. If seed size-independent postdispersal ID is less than 0.5, predispersal ID will select for selfed seeds receiving more maternal investment than outcrossed seeds. The same is true for decreased efficiency of maternal investment. If decreased efficiency of maternal investment leads to a reduction in selfed seed size, selfed seeds may end up being smaller than outcrossed seeds. The model highlights the complex roles ID plays in determining seed size and indicates that empirical measurement of postdispersal ID may underestimate its extent. Tests of the model may help us understand whether plants can adaptively allocate resources differentially between selfed and outcrossed seeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 5","pages":"516-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractInbreeding depression (ID) has different components, and how these affect selection on seed size is currently unknown. Using an optimality model, I find that when pollen limitation selects for mixed mating systems, increased predispersal ID (abortion of selfed ovules) increases the optimal sizes of both selfed and outcrossed seeds, whereas increased seed size-independent postdispersal ID (reduced survival of selfed seeds) only increases the size of outcrossed seeds. The effect of decreased efficiency of maternal investment in selfed seeds depends on details of the model assumptions, but in many cases it will increase resource allocation to both types of seeds. If seed size-independent postdispersal ID is less than 0.5, predispersal ID will select for selfed seeds receiving more maternal investment than outcrossed seeds. The same is true for decreased efficiency of maternal investment. If decreased efficiency of maternal investment leads to a reduction in selfed seed size, selfed seeds may end up being smaller than outcrossed seeds. The model highlights the complex roles ID plays in determining seed size and indicates that empirical measurement of postdispersal ID may underestimate its extent. Tests of the model may help us understand whether plants can adaptively allocate resources differentially between selfed and outcrossed seeds.

分散前和分散后近交抑制解耦时混合交配系统下最优种子大小。
育种抑制(ID)具有不同的组成成分,它们如何影响种子大小的选择目前尚不清楚。利用最优性模型,我发现当花粉限制选择混合交配系统时,增加的传播前ID(自交胚珠的败育)增加了自交和异交种子的最优大小,而增加的种子大小无关的传播后ID(自交种子存活率降低)只增加了异交种子的大小。母亲对自交种子投资效率降低的影响取决于模型假设的细节,但在许多情况下,它将增加对两种种子的资源分配。当种子大小无关的后扩散ID小于0.5时,自交种子比异交种子获得更多的母系投资,将选择前扩散ID。产妇投资效率下降也是如此。如果母系投入效率降低导致自交种子尺寸减小,自交种子最终可能比异交种子小。该模型强调了ID在决定种子大小方面的复杂作用,并表明对传播后ID的经验测量可能低估了其程度。该模型的检验可以帮助我们了解植物是否能够在自交和异交种子之间自适应地分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信