Madita Röhlinger, Christine Albrecht, Christian Bellebaum
{"title":"The Role of the N170 in Linking Stimuli to Feedback-Effects of Stimulus Modality and Feedback Delay.","authors":"Madita Röhlinger, Christine Albrecht, Christian Bellebaum","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With increasing feedback delay, feedback processing appears to shift from the striatum to the hippocampus. In addition, higher-order sensory areas might be involved in bridging a temporal gap between stimulus and feedback by reactivating the representation of the feedback-predicting stimulus during feedback processing. We hypothesized that the feedback-locked N170, an occipito-temporal event-related potential (ERP) component linked to higher-order visual processing, is more pronounced when delayed feedback is provided for choices between visual compared to auditory stimuli. 35 subjects completed a probabilistic feedback learning task with immediate (1 s) and delayed (7 s) monetary feedback for choices between visual or auditory stimuli. Participants successfully learned to choose the more rewarding stimuli irrespective of stimulus modality. For the N170 amplitude over the right hemisphere, we found an interaction between feedback timing and the modality of the chosen stimulus. Only for delayed feedback, the N170 was more pronounced for choices between visual than auditory stimuli. Moreover, in this condition, the N170 amplitude particularly reflected the reward prediction error (PE), with larger amplitudes for positive PEs and lower amplitudes for negative PEs. This suggests that the N170 reflects feedback-locked reactivations in higher-order visual areas mediated by the reward PE. While these effects need to be studied further, we discuss the N170 as a counterpart to the feedback-related negativity (FRN) regarding interacting influences of feedback valence, feedback timing, and PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 4","pages":"e70050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With increasing feedback delay, feedback processing appears to shift from the striatum to the hippocampus. In addition, higher-order sensory areas might be involved in bridging a temporal gap between stimulus and feedback by reactivating the representation of the feedback-predicting stimulus during feedback processing. We hypothesized that the feedback-locked N170, an occipito-temporal event-related potential (ERP) component linked to higher-order visual processing, is more pronounced when delayed feedback is provided for choices between visual compared to auditory stimuli. 35 subjects completed a probabilistic feedback learning task with immediate (1 s) and delayed (7 s) monetary feedback for choices between visual or auditory stimuli. Participants successfully learned to choose the more rewarding stimuli irrespective of stimulus modality. For the N170 amplitude over the right hemisphere, we found an interaction between feedback timing and the modality of the chosen stimulus. Only for delayed feedback, the N170 was more pronounced for choices between visual than auditory stimuli. Moreover, in this condition, the N170 amplitude particularly reflected the reward prediction error (PE), with larger amplitudes for positive PEs and lower amplitudes for negative PEs. This suggests that the N170 reflects feedback-locked reactivations in higher-order visual areas mediated by the reward PE. While these effects need to be studied further, we discuss the N170 as a counterpart to the feedback-related negativity (FRN) regarding interacting influences of feedback valence, feedback timing, and PE.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.