Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Superficial Parotid Pleomorphic Adenoma.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chih-Ying Lee, Wei-Che Lin, Sheng-Dean Luo, Pi-Ling Chiang, An-Ni Lin, Cheng-Kang Wang, Chun-Yuan Chao
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Superficial Parotid Pleomorphic Adenoma.","authors":"Chih-Ying Lee, Wei-Che Lin, Sheng-Dean Luo, Pi-Ling Chiang, An-Ni Lin, Cheng-Kang Wang, Chun-Yuan Chao","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2024.0909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with parotidectomy for superficial pleomorphic adenoma (PA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From March 2022 to October 2023, 88 patients diagnosed with superficial parotid PA underwent either RFA (n = 12; mean age, 47.1 years) or parotidectomy (n = 76; mean age, 47.8 years). Patients in the RFA group were matched to those in the surgery group in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on age, sex, tumor volume, diameter, location, and comorbidities. Ultrasound characteristics, cosmetic scores (0-4), numerical rating scale scores (0-10), and complications were assessed before the procedures and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Outcomes were compared between baseline and follow-up in the RFA group and between the RFA and surgery groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the RFA group, significant reductions in tumor volume were observed between baseline (median, 2.02 cm³) and the 1-month follow-up (median, 1.21 cm³; <i>P</i> = 0.015), between the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups (median, 0.53 cm³; <i>P</i> = 0.002), and between the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (median, 0.23 cm³; <i>P</i> = 0.003). The volume reduction ratios at 1, 3, and 6 months were 39.7%, 79.9%, and 88.0%, respectively. The cosmetic score was significantly lower at 3- and 6-month follow-up compared to baseline (median 1 and 1 vs. 4, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The numerical rating scale scores did not differ significantly from baseline throughout follow-up. In the propensity score-matched analysis (12 patients per group), RFA was associated with a shorter median procedure time (61.5 vs. 253.3 minutes; <i>P</i> < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (0 vs. 4 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and lower cost (1859.9 vs. 3512.4 USD; <i>P</i> < 0.001) than parotidectomy, with no significant difference in overall complication rates (33.3% [4/12] vs. 41.7% [5/12]; <i>P</i> = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for superficial parotid PA, offering a shorter median procedure time, shorter hospital stay, and lower costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"26 5","pages":"460-470"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with parotidectomy for superficial pleomorphic adenoma (PA).

Materials and methods: From March 2022 to October 2023, 88 patients diagnosed with superficial parotid PA underwent either RFA (n = 12; mean age, 47.1 years) or parotidectomy (n = 76; mean age, 47.8 years). Patients in the RFA group were matched to those in the surgery group in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on age, sex, tumor volume, diameter, location, and comorbidities. Ultrasound characteristics, cosmetic scores (0-4), numerical rating scale scores (0-10), and complications were assessed before the procedures and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Outcomes were compared between baseline and follow-up in the RFA group and between the RFA and surgery groups.

Results: In the RFA group, significant reductions in tumor volume were observed between baseline (median, 2.02 cm³) and the 1-month follow-up (median, 1.21 cm³; P = 0.015), between the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups (median, 0.53 cm³; P = 0.002), and between the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (median, 0.23 cm³; P = 0.003). The volume reduction ratios at 1, 3, and 6 months were 39.7%, 79.9%, and 88.0%, respectively. The cosmetic score was significantly lower at 3- and 6-month follow-up compared to baseline (median 1 and 1 vs. 4, P = 0.04). The numerical rating scale scores did not differ significantly from baseline throughout follow-up. In the propensity score-matched analysis (12 patients per group), RFA was associated with a shorter median procedure time (61.5 vs. 253.3 minutes; P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (0 vs. 4 days; P < 0.001), and lower cost (1859.9 vs. 3512.4 USD; P < 0.001) than parotidectomy, with no significant difference in overall complication rates (33.3% [4/12] vs. 41.7% [5/12]; P = 1.000).

Conclusion: RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for superficial parotid PA, offering a shorter median procedure time, shorter hospital stay, and lower costs.

射频消融治疗腮腺表面多形性腺瘤的安全性和有效性。
目的:回顾性比较超声引导下射频消融(RFA)与腮腺切除术治疗浅表性多形性腺瘤(PA)的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:2022年3月至2023年10月,88例诊断为腮腺浅表性PA的患者接受了RFA (n = 12;平均年龄47.1岁)或腮腺切除术(n = 76;平均年龄47.8岁)。采用基于年龄、性别、肿瘤体积、直径、位置和合并症的倾向评分,RFA组患者与手术组患者按1:1的比例进行匹配。超声特征、美容评分(0-4)、数值评定量表评分(0-10)和并发症在手术前和1、3、6个月随访时进行评估。比较RFA组的基线和随访结果以及RFA组和手术组的结果。结果:在RFA组中,肿瘤体积在基线(中位数,2.02 cm³)和1个月随访(中位数,1.21 cm³;P = 0.015), 1个月和3个月随访期间(中位数,0.53 cm³;P = 0.002), 3- 6个月随访期间(中位数,0.23 cm³;P = 0.003)。1个月、3个月和6个月的体积缩小率分别为39.7%、79.9%和88.0%。随访3个月和6个月时,美容评分明显低于基线(中位数为1和1比4,P = 0.04)。在整个随访过程中,数值评定量表得分与基线没有显著差异。在倾向评分匹配分析(每组12例患者)中,RFA与较短的中位手术时间相关(61.5 vs 253.3分钟;P < 0.001),住院时间较短(0天vs. 4天;P < 0.001),成本更低(1859.9美元vs 3512.4美元;P < 0.001)与腮腺切除术相比,总并发症发生率无显著差异(33.3% [4/12]vs. 41.7% [5/12];P = 1.000)。结论:RFA可能是一种安全有效的腮腺浅表性PA替代手术,具有更短的中位手术时间,更短的住院时间和更低的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信