José Antonio Cernuda Martínez, Rick Kye Gan, Pedro Arcos González
{"title":"Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Version.","authors":"José Antonio Cernuda Martínez, Rick Kye Gan, Pedro Arcos González","doi":"10.1111/phn.13566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standardized tool, the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET), originally published in English, is available for the purpose of assessing the level of disaster preparedness among nurses, however, a Spanish version is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to prepare a Spanish version of the DPET (DPET-SP), and secondly, to analyse the psychometric properties of the new Spanish version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The target population comprised nurses in the region of Asturias, Spain. Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and item-total correlations (item discrimination) were used to test the reliability of the tool. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity of the Spanish version was estimated using the scale-level content validity index. The appropriateness of the factor analysis was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin test. Sphericity of the correlation matrix was examined using Barlett's test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to categorise the measurement instrument into salient factors. Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCA determined that the 45 items could be grouped into five factors Cronbach's alpha value was 0.964, the AVE values for the five constructs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71, the goodness-of-fit of the model structure was good, the convergence reliability values ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the square root of the AVE of each individual factor must be greater than all other correlations between pairs of constructs, so there is divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DPET-SP has adequate validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be utilised by nurses for whom Spanish is their first language.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A standardized tool, the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET), originally published in English, is available for the purpose of assessing the level of disaster preparedness among nurses, however, a Spanish version is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to prepare a Spanish version of the DPET (DPET-SP), and secondly, to analyse the psychometric properties of the new Spanish version.
Methods: The target population comprised nurses in the region of Asturias, Spain. Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and item-total correlations (item discrimination) were used to test the reliability of the tool. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity of the Spanish version was estimated using the scale-level content validity index. The appropriateness of the factor analysis was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin test. Sphericity of the correlation matrix was examined using Barlett's test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to categorise the measurement instrument into salient factors. Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE).
Results: The PCA determined that the 45 items could be grouped into five factors Cronbach's alpha value was 0.964, the AVE values for the five constructs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71, the goodness-of-fit of the model structure was good, the convergence reliability values ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the square root of the AVE of each individual factor must be greater than all other correlations between pairs of constructs, so there is divergent validity.
Conclusions: The DPET-SP has adequate validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be utilised by nurses for whom Spanish is their first language.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.