Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Version.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
José Antonio Cernuda Martínez, Rick Kye Gan, Pedro Arcos González
{"title":"Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Version.","authors":"José Antonio Cernuda Martínez, Rick Kye Gan, Pedro Arcos González","doi":"10.1111/phn.13566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standardized tool, the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET), originally published in English, is available for the purpose of assessing the level of disaster preparedness among nurses, however, a Spanish version is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to prepare a Spanish version of the DPET (DPET-SP), and secondly, to analyse the psychometric properties of the new Spanish version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The target population comprised nurses in the region of Asturias, Spain. Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and item-total correlations (item discrimination) were used to test the reliability of the tool. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity of the Spanish version was estimated using the scale-level content validity index. The appropriateness of the factor analysis was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin test. Sphericity of the correlation matrix was examined using Barlett's test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to categorise the measurement instrument into salient factors. Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCA determined that the 45 items could be grouped into five factors Cronbach's alpha value was 0.964, the AVE values for the five constructs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71, the goodness-of-fit of the model structure was good, the convergence reliability values ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the square root of the AVE of each individual factor must be greater than all other correlations between pairs of constructs, so there is divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DPET-SP has adequate validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be utilised by nurses for whom Spanish is their first language.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A standardized tool, the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET), originally published in English, is available for the purpose of assessing the level of disaster preparedness among nurses, however, a Spanish version is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to prepare a Spanish version of the DPET (DPET-SP), and secondly, to analyse the psychometric properties of the new Spanish version.

Methods: The target population comprised nurses in the region of Asturias, Spain. Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and item-total correlations (item discrimination) were used to test the reliability of the tool. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity of the Spanish version was estimated using the scale-level content validity index. The appropriateness of the factor analysis was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin test. Sphericity of the correlation matrix was examined using Barlett's test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to categorise the measurement instrument into salient factors. Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE).

Results: The PCA determined that the 45 items could be grouped into five factors Cronbach's alpha value was 0.964, the AVE values for the five constructs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71, the goodness-of-fit of the model structure was good, the convergence reliability values ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the square root of the AVE of each individual factor must be greater than all other correlations between pairs of constructs, so there is divergent validity.

Conclusions: The DPET-SP has adequate validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be utilised by nurses for whom Spanish is their first language.

备灾评估工具:西班牙文版的适应与心理测量评估。
背景:一种标准化工具,即灾害准备评估工具(DPET),最初以英文出版,可用于评估护士的备灾水平,然而,西班牙语版本尚未开发。本研究的目的有两个:首先,准备一个西班牙语版本的DPET (DPET- sp),其次,分析新的西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。方法:目标人群为西班牙阿斯图里亚斯地区的护士。使用Cronbach's alpha(内部一致性)和项目-总相关性(项目歧视)来检验工具的可靠性。构念效度采用验证性因子分析进行检验。西班牙语版本的内容效度采用量表水平的内容效度指数估计。采用Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin检验对因子分析的适宜性进行检验。用巴雷特检验检验相关矩阵的球度。采用主成分分析(PCA)对测量仪器进行显著因子分类。采用平均方差提取(AVE)评估收敛效度。结果:经主成分分析,45个项目可归为5个因子,Cronbach’s alpha值为0.964,5个构式的AVE值为0.51 ~ 0.71,模型结构拟合优度较好,收敛信度值为0.80 ~ 0.95,且各因子AVE的平方根一定大于构式对间的其他相关,具有发散效度。结论:DPET-SP具有足够的效度和信度。因此,它可以被以西班牙语为第一语言的护士使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信