Identification and validation of a risk assessment scoring tool for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia at a tertiary teaching hospital.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.70
Victoria Gavaghan, Jessica L Miller, Maureen Shields, Jennifer Dela-Pena
{"title":"Identification and validation of a risk assessment scoring tool for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia at a tertiary teaching hospital.","authors":"Victoria Gavaghan, Jessica L Miller, Maureen Shields, Jennifer Dela-Pena","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify institution-specific risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bloodstream infections (BSI) to develop and validate a risk assessment scoring tool that can be utilized for hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective, case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hospitalized adult and pediatric patients with <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. BSI were stratified based on ESBL production between August 2019 to July 2021. Exclusion criteria included patients < 28 days old, a positive blood culture resulting prior to admission/after discharge or a polymicrobial and/or carbapenem-resistant BSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of ESBL in a derivation cohort. Predictors were applied to a novel validation BSI cohort using area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (ROC AUC) to assess the reliability of identifying patients likely to harbor ESBL at the time of organism identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 238 patients in the derivation cohort met inclusion criteria stratified as ESBL (n = 68) or non-ESBL (n = 170). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated diabetes, 30-day history of invasive procedure or antibiotic use, and/or history of ESBL as independent predictors of ESBL. After creation of an ESBL risk assessment tool, the results were applied to a validation cohort of 170 patients. This model displayed good calibration and discrimination with a strong predictive power (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ<sup>2</sup>= 4.66, p = 0.19; ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.7909 - 0.974).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A validated ESBL risk assessment tool reliably identified hospitalized patients likely to harbor ESBL <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. BSI upon organism identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify institution-specific risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bloodstream infections (BSI) to develop and validate a risk assessment scoring tool that can be utilized for hospitalized patients.

Design: Single-center, retrospective, case-control study.

Setting: Tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients: Hospitalized adult and pediatric patients with E. coli or Klebsiella spp. BSI were stratified based on ESBL production between August 2019 to July 2021. Exclusion criteria included patients < 28 days old, a positive blood culture resulting prior to admission/after discharge or a polymicrobial and/or carbapenem-resistant BSI.

Methods: Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of ESBL in a derivation cohort. Predictors were applied to a novel validation BSI cohort using area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (ROC AUC) to assess the reliability of identifying patients likely to harbor ESBL at the time of organism identification.

Results: A total of 238 patients in the derivation cohort met inclusion criteria stratified as ESBL (n = 68) or non-ESBL (n = 170). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated diabetes, 30-day history of invasive procedure or antibiotic use, and/or history of ESBL as independent predictors of ESBL. After creation of an ESBL risk assessment tool, the results were applied to a validation cohort of 170 patients. This model displayed good calibration and discrimination with a strong predictive power (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2= 4.66, p = 0.19; ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.7909 - 0.974).

Conclusions: A validated ESBL risk assessment tool reliably identified hospitalized patients likely to harbor ESBL E. coli or Klebsiella spp. BSI upon organism identification.

某三级教学医院产β -内酰胺酶肠杆菌菌血症风险评估评分工具的鉴定与验证
目的:确定广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)血流感染(BSI)的机构特异性危险因素,以开发和验证可用于住院患者的风险评估评分工具。设计:单中心、回顾性、病例对照研究。单位:三级教学医院。患者:2019年8月至2021年7月期间,根据ESBL产量对感染大肠杆菌或克雷伯氏杆菌BSI的住院成人和儿童患者进行分层。排除标准包括小于28天的患者,入院前/出院后血培养阳性或多微生物和/或碳青霉烯耐药BSI。方法:多变量logistic回归评估衍生队列中ESBL的预测因素。预测因子应用于一个新的BSI验证队列,使用接受者-操作者特征曲线下的面积(ROC AUC)来评估在机体识别时识别可能携带ESBL的患者的可靠性。结果:衍生队列中共有238例患者符合纳入标准,分为ESBL (n = 68)或非ESBL (n = 170)。多变量logistic回归显示,糖尿病、30天侵入性手术史或抗生素使用史和/或ESBL史是ESBL的独立预测因素。创建ESBL风险评估工具后,将结果应用于170例患者的验证队列。该模型具有较好的校正性和判别性,预测能力强(Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2= 4.66, p = 0.19;Roc auc = 0.88, 95% ci = 0.7909 - 0.974)。结论:经过验证的ESBL风险评估工具可靠地识别出可能携带ESBL大肠杆菌或克雷伯氏杆菌BSI的住院患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信