Comprehensive Comparison of Methods for Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Plasma.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Patil Shivprasad Suresh, Qibin Zhang
{"title":"Comprehensive Comparison of Methods for Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Plasma.","authors":"Patil Shivprasad Suresh, Qibin Zhang","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a vital component in cell-cell communication and hold significant potential as biomarkers and therapeutic carriers. Having a reproducible and simple EV isolation method for small volumes of human plasma is essential for biomarker discovery. Although combining multiple methods has been a recent trend in its ability to minimize contamination, it is not ideal for clinical specimens due to the large sample number and small sample volume. This study compared EVs isolated from 100 μL of plasma by nine commonly used methods based on different principles, including centrifugation, polymer precipitation, size exclusion, electrostatic interaction, and affinity enrichment. The isolated EVs were characterized by particle size and number using nanoparticle tracking analysis, purity, and contaminants using Simple Western and overall proteomic profiles using bottom-up proteomics. Despite the same EV enrichment principle, individual methods isolated EVs exhibited distinct characteristics, likely due to variations in the physicochemical properties of materials used and specific protocols. Overall, all of the methods evaluated are reproducible. MagNet and MagCap methods result in purer EVs with the narrowest size distribution and the highest proteome coverage but modest yield. This is the first report on isolating EVs from 100 μL of plasma using nine different methods with detailed characterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a vital component in cell-cell communication and hold significant potential as biomarkers and therapeutic carriers. Having a reproducible and simple EV isolation method for small volumes of human plasma is essential for biomarker discovery. Although combining multiple methods has been a recent trend in its ability to minimize contamination, it is not ideal for clinical specimens due to the large sample number and small sample volume. This study compared EVs isolated from 100 μL of plasma by nine commonly used methods based on different principles, including centrifugation, polymer precipitation, size exclusion, electrostatic interaction, and affinity enrichment. The isolated EVs were characterized by particle size and number using nanoparticle tracking analysis, purity, and contaminants using Simple Western and overall proteomic profiles using bottom-up proteomics. Despite the same EV enrichment principle, individual methods isolated EVs exhibited distinct characteristics, likely due to variations in the physicochemical properties of materials used and specific protocols. Overall, all of the methods evaluated are reproducible. MagNet and MagCap methods result in purer EVs with the narrowest size distribution and the highest proteome coverage but modest yield. This is the first report on isolating EVs from 100 μL of plasma using nine different methods with detailed characterization.

人血浆细胞外囊泡分离方法的综合比较。
细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞间通讯的重要组成部分,作为生物标志物和治疗载体具有重要的潜力。拥有一种可重复性和简单的小体积人血浆的EV分离方法对于生物标志物的发现至关重要。虽然结合多种方法已成为最近减少污染的趋势,但由于样本量大,样本量小,因此不适合临床标本。本研究比较了从100 μL等离子体中分离得到的ev,采用了离心、聚合物沉淀、粒径排除、静电相互作用和亲和富集等9种常用方法。利用纳米颗粒跟踪分析对分离的电动汽车进行粒径和数量的表征,利用Simple Western对其纯度和污染物进行表征,利用自下而上的蛋白质组学对其进行总体蛋白质组学分析。尽管采用相同的EV富集原理,但分离EV的不同方法表现出不同的特征,这可能是由于所用材料的物理化学性质和特定方案的差异。总的来说,所有评估的方法都是可重复的。MagNet和MagCap方法的结果是更纯净的电动汽车,尺寸分布最窄,蛋白质组覆盖率最高,但产量适中。本文首次报道了用9种不同的方法从100 μL血浆中分离出ev,并进行了详细的鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信