Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Aldo Kammerlander, Simon Raphael Schneider, Michael Furian, Esther Irene Schwarz, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Julian Müller
{"title":"Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.","authors":"Aldo Kammerlander, Simon Raphael Schneider, Michael Furian, Esther Irene Schwarz, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Julian Müller","doi":"10.1159/000545787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m3\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m4\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.
Methods: In a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (V˙O2). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (V˙E) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.
Results: At a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered V˙O2 by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and V˙E by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: ECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.