Do We Ask What the Deities Can Do for Us? The Roles of Dao Religion and Resilience in Suicidality in Chronic Pain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/3056383
Ling-Jun Liu, Hsiu-Ling Peng, Edward Meng-Hua Lin, Wan-Ping Liang
{"title":"Do We Ask What the Deities Can Do for Us? The Roles of Dao Religion and Resilience in Suicidality in Chronic Pain.","authors":"Ling-Jun Liu, Hsiu-Ling Peng, Edward Meng-Hua Lin, Wan-Ping Liang","doi":"10.1155/prm/3056383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Resilience to pain is a protective factor against aversive pain outcomes, such as suicide. Religiosity as a cornerstone of resilience has been found to be associated with reduced risk of suicidality in chronic pain. However, affiliations to different religions have displayed differences in suicide risk. This study focuses on the roles of pain resilience and Dao religion in mitigating suicidal experience in individuals with chronic pain. <b>Methods:</b> This study adopted a mixed-method approach. A preliminary investigation was conducted regarding the internal consistency and construct validity of the translated version of the pain resilience scale (PRS). Qualitative data were collected through interviews with individuals experiencing chronic pain. Levels of PRS and gender were included in the logistic regression on the probability of suicide attempts. The role of Dao practice was qualitatively analyzed through narrative analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 24 participants, 14 were affiliated with the Dao religion; therefore, the transcripts of these 14 interviews were analyzed. Individuals with moderate scores on the PRS were 11.60 times less likely to have attempted suicide than those with low PRS scores. The likelihood further decreased by 38.7 times in those with high PRS scores. Four themes emerged from the qualitative interviews. The participants experienced a burden from pain, made efforts to please the deities in exchange for better pain control, continuously adjusted to pain, and ultimately developed a new perspective on the relationship between their religion and pain. Many individuals have engaged in Dao rituals to try to alleviate their physical and psychological pain. Most participants tended to offer a religious interpretation of enlightening moments after surviving a suicide attempt. <b>Discussion:</b> This study illustrates how pain resilience and Dao religious practices mitigate suicidality in chronic pain. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05148364.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3056383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/3056383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Resilience to pain is a protective factor against aversive pain outcomes, such as suicide. Religiosity as a cornerstone of resilience has been found to be associated with reduced risk of suicidality in chronic pain. However, affiliations to different religions have displayed differences in suicide risk. This study focuses on the roles of pain resilience and Dao religion in mitigating suicidal experience in individuals with chronic pain. Methods: This study adopted a mixed-method approach. A preliminary investigation was conducted regarding the internal consistency and construct validity of the translated version of the pain resilience scale (PRS). Qualitative data were collected through interviews with individuals experiencing chronic pain. Levels of PRS and gender were included in the logistic regression on the probability of suicide attempts. The role of Dao practice was qualitatively analyzed through narrative analysis. Results: Among the 24 participants, 14 were affiliated with the Dao religion; therefore, the transcripts of these 14 interviews were analyzed. Individuals with moderate scores on the PRS were 11.60 times less likely to have attempted suicide than those with low PRS scores. The likelihood further decreased by 38.7 times in those with high PRS scores. Four themes emerged from the qualitative interviews. The participants experienced a burden from pain, made efforts to please the deities in exchange for better pain control, continuously adjusted to pain, and ultimately developed a new perspective on the relationship between their religion and pain. Many individuals have engaged in Dao rituals to try to alleviate their physical and psychological pain. Most participants tended to offer a religious interpretation of enlightening moments after surviving a suicide attempt. Discussion: This study illustrates how pain resilience and Dao religious practices mitigate suicidality in chronic pain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05148364.

我们是否问过神能为我们做些什么?道教与心理韧性在慢性疼痛患者自杀中的作用。
目的:对疼痛的恢复力是对厌恶疼痛结果(如自杀)的保护因素。宗教信仰作为恢复力的基石,已经被发现与慢性疼痛中自杀风险的降低有关。然而,不同宗教信仰的人在自杀风险上存在差异。本研究主要探讨疼痛复原力和道教在减轻慢性疼痛患者自杀体验中的作用。方法:本研究采用混合方法。对翻译版疼痛弹性量表(PRS)的内部一致性和结构效度进行了初步调查。定性数据是通过对经历慢性疼痛的个体的访谈收集的。自杀企图概率的逻辑回归包括PRS水平和性别。通过叙事分析,定性地分析了道法的作用。结果:24名参与者中,有14人隶属于道教;因此,对这14次访谈的笔录进行分析。在PRS上得分中等的个体企图自杀的可能性比那些PRS得分低的个体低11.60倍。在PRS得分高的人群中,这种可能性进一步降低了38.7倍。定性访谈中出现了四个主题。参与者经历了痛苦的负担,努力取悦神灵以换取更好的疼痛控制,不断适应疼痛,最终形成了他们的宗教与疼痛之间关系的新视角。许多人参加道的仪式,试图减轻他们的身体和心理的痛苦。大多数参与者倾向于对自杀未遂后的启发时刻给出宗教解释。讨论:本研究阐明了疼痛弹性和道教实践如何减轻慢性疼痛患者的自杀倾向。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05148364。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信