Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva, Yuan-Mao Lin, Alexander Shieh, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Caraffiello, Carlo Gazzera, Kyle A Jones, Paolo Fonio, Reto Bale, Kristy K Brock, Marco Calandri, Bruno C Odisio
求助PDF
{"title":"Quantitative Ablation Confirmation Methods in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: Technical Insights, Clinical Evidence, and Future Outlook.","authors":"Iwan Paolucci, Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva, Yuan-Mao Lin, Alexander Shieh, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Caraffiello, Carlo Gazzera, Kyle A Jones, Paolo Fonio, Reto Bale, Kristy K Brock, Marco Calandri, Bruno C Odisio","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation is an established local curative-intent treatment technique for the treatment of primary and secondary malignant liver tumors. Whereas margin assessment after surgical resection can be accomplished with microscopic examination of the resected specimen, margin assessment after percutaneous thermal ablation relies on cross-sectional imaging. The critical measure of technical success is the minimal ablative margin (MAM), defined as the minimum distance between the tumor and the edge of the ablation zone. Traditionally, the MAM has been assessed qualitatively using anatomic landmarks, which has suboptimal accuracy and reproducibility and is prone to operator bias. Consequently, specialized software-based methods have been developed to standardize and automate MAM quantification. In this review, the authors discuss the technical components of such methods, including image acquisition, segmentation, registration, and MAM computation, define the sources of measurement error, describe available software solutions in terms of image processing techniques and modes of integration, and outline the current clinical evidence, which strongly supports the use of such dedicated software. Finally, the authors discuss current logistical and financial barriers to widespread use of ablation confirmation methods as well as potential solutions. <b>Keywords:</b> Ablation Techniques, CT, Image Postprocessing, Liver <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 3","pages":"e240293"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation is an established local curative-intent treatment technique for the treatment of primary and secondary malignant liver tumors. Whereas margin assessment after surgical resection can be accomplished with microscopic examination of the resected specimen, margin assessment after percutaneous thermal ablation relies on cross-sectional imaging. The critical measure of technical success is the minimal ablative margin (MAM), defined as the minimum distance between the tumor and the edge of the ablation zone. Traditionally, the MAM has been assessed qualitatively using anatomic landmarks, which has suboptimal accuracy and reproducibility and is prone to operator bias. Consequently, specialized software-based methods have been developed to standardize and automate MAM quantification. In this review, the authors discuss the technical components of such methods, including image acquisition, segmentation, registration, and MAM computation, define the sources of measurement error, describe available software solutions in terms of image processing techniques and modes of integration, and outline the current clinical evidence, which strongly supports the use of such dedicated software. Finally, the authors discuss current logistical and financial barriers to widespread use of ablation confirmation methods as well as potential solutions. Keywords: Ablation Techniques, CT, Image Postprocessing, Liver Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.
经皮肝恶性肿瘤热消融定量消融确认方法:技术见解、临床证据和未来展望。
经皮图像引导热消融术是治疗原发性和继发性肝恶性肿瘤的一种成熟的局部治疗技术。手术切除后的边缘评估可以通过切除标本的显微检查来完成,而经皮热消融后的边缘评估则依赖于横断面成像。技术成功的关键指标是最小消融边缘(MAM),定义为肿瘤与消融区边缘之间的最小距离。传统上,MAM是使用解剖标记进行定性评估的,其准确性和可重复性不理想,并且容易出现操作员偏差。因此,已经开发了专门的基于软件的方法来标准化和自动化MAM量化。在这篇综述中,作者讨论了这些方法的技术组成部分,包括图像采集、分割、配准和MAM计算,定义了测量误差的来源,描述了图像处理技术和集成模式方面的可用软件解决方案,并概述了目前的临床证据,这些证据强烈支持使用这种专用软件。最后,作者讨论了目前广泛使用烧蚀确认方法的后勤和财务障碍以及潜在的解决方案。关键词:消融技术,CT,图像后处理,肝脏。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。