Loss to follow-up and risk of incident blindness among patients with glaucoma in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

Q2 Medicine
Andrew M Williams, Hai-Wei Liang, Hsing-Hua Sylvia Lin
{"title":"Loss to follow-up and risk of incident blindness among patients with glaucoma in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).","authors":"Andrew M Williams, Hai-Wei Liang, Hsing-Hua Sylvia Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the association between loss to follow-up (LTFU) and risk of incident blindness among a national registry cohort of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with a POAG diagnosis who had at least two visual acuity (VA) measures documented in the IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) in both 2014 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LTFU was defined as a calendar year or more without an encounter. Univariable and multivariable robust log-Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) of incident blindness associated with intervals of LTFU as the primary exposure of interest. Effect modification by baseline characteristics on the association between LTFU and incident blindness was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Incident blindness in one or both eyes (VA ≤20/200) in 2019 among patients who were not blind in 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 149,172 patients, incident monocular blindness occurred in 6,338 (4.2%) and incident binocular blindness occurred in 691 (0.5%) over the 6-year period. While most patients maintained follow up every year (90%), 8.8% were LTFU for 1-2 years, and 1.1% were LTFU for 3-4 years. Patients with LTFU had greater risk of blindness. In an adjusted model that accounted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance, smoking status, glaucoma severity, baseline intraocular pressure, baseline cup-to-disc ratio, and history of glaucoma surgery, risk of incident monocular blindness was greater among patients with a lapse of 1-2 years (adjusted RR [aRR]=1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35) or a lapse of 3-4 years (aRR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.66-2.78) compared to patients with no lapse in care. Race and ethnicity demonstrated a significant effect modification in the association between the longest lapse between encounters and the risk of blindness (P=0.02). The risk of incident blindness after a lapse of 3-4 years (compared to no lapse) was higher among Black patients (aRR=3.12, 95% CI: 2.06-4.76) than among White patients (aRR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.37-2.73). No effect modifications were identified by other baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTFU is an independent risk factor for incident blindness among patients with POAG. Lapses in care are particularly consequential for Black patients. Efforts to reduce LTFU may mitigate preventable glaucoma blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the association between loss to follow-up (LTFU) and risk of incident blindness among a national registry cohort of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Design: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Participants: Patients with a POAG diagnosis who had at least two visual acuity (VA) measures documented in the IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) in both 2014 and 2019.

Methods: LTFU was defined as a calendar year or more without an encounter. Univariable and multivariable robust log-Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) of incident blindness associated with intervals of LTFU as the primary exposure of interest. Effect modification by baseline characteristics on the association between LTFU and incident blindness was also assessed.

Main outcome measures: Incident blindness in one or both eyes (VA ≤20/200) in 2019 among patients who were not blind in 2014.

Results: Among 149,172 patients, incident monocular blindness occurred in 6,338 (4.2%) and incident binocular blindness occurred in 691 (0.5%) over the 6-year period. While most patients maintained follow up every year (90%), 8.8% were LTFU for 1-2 years, and 1.1% were LTFU for 3-4 years. Patients with LTFU had greater risk of blindness. In an adjusted model that accounted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance, smoking status, glaucoma severity, baseline intraocular pressure, baseline cup-to-disc ratio, and history of glaucoma surgery, risk of incident monocular blindness was greater among patients with a lapse of 1-2 years (adjusted RR [aRR]=1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35) or a lapse of 3-4 years (aRR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.66-2.78) compared to patients with no lapse in care. Race and ethnicity demonstrated a significant effect modification in the association between the longest lapse between encounters and the risk of blindness (P=0.02). The risk of incident blindness after a lapse of 3-4 years (compared to no lapse) was higher among Black patients (aRR=3.12, 95% CI: 2.06-4.76) than among White patients (aRR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.37-2.73). No effect modifications were identified by other baseline variables.

Conclusions: LTFU is an independent risk factor for incident blindness among patients with POAG. Lapses in care are particularly consequential for Black patients. Efforts to reduce LTFU may mitigate preventable glaucoma blindness.

IRIS®注册(视力智能研究)中青光眼患者的随访损失和致盲风险
目的:在一项国家注册的原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者队列中,评估随访缺失(LTFU)与致盲风险之间的关系。设计:回顾性纵向队列研究。参与者:2014年和2019年在IRIS登记处(视力智能研究)中记录了至少两项视力(VA)测量的POAG诊断患者。方法:LTFU被定义为一个日历年或更长时间没有相遇。使用单变量和多变量稳健对数泊松回归模型来估计与LTFU间隔作为主要暴露相关的事件失明的相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。还评估了基线特征对LTFU与偶发性失明之间关系的影响。主要观察指标:2014年未失明的患者中,2019年单眼或双眼偶发失明(VA≤20/200)。结果:在149,172例患者中,6年期间发生单眼失明的有6,338例(4.2%),双眼失明的有691例(0.5%)。大多数患者保持每年随访(90%),8.8%的患者持续1-2年LTFU, 1.1%的患者持续3-4年LTFU。LTFU患者有更大的失明风险。在一个考虑了年龄、性别、种族和民族、保险、吸烟状况、青光眼严重程度、基线眼压、基线杯盘比和青光眼手术史的调整模型中,与没有护理失误的患者相比,1-2年(调整RR [aRR]=1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35)或3-4年(aRR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.66-2.78)的患者发生单眼失明的风险更大。种族和民族在最长接触间隔和失明风险之间的关系中显示出显著的影响变化(P=0.02)。黑人患者在3-4年后(与无患者相比)发生致盲的风险(aRR=3.12, 95% CI: 2.06-4.76)高于白人患者(aRR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.37-2.73)。其他基线变量未发现任何影响改变。结论:LTFU是POAG患者致盲的独立危险因素。护理失误对黑人患者的影响尤为严重。努力减少LTFU可能减轻可预防的青光眼失明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信