In-situ simulation-based team training reduces incidence of negative events during bronchoscopy. A prospective educational intervention cohort study.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Andreas Fosli Clausen, Søren Sperling, Rune Dall Jensen, Søren Helbo Skaarup
{"title":"In-situ simulation-based team training reduces incidence of negative events during bronchoscopy. A prospective educational intervention cohort study.","authors":"Andreas Fosli Clausen, Søren Sperling, Rune Dall Jensen, Søren Helbo Skaarup","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03205-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While bronchoscopy complications are rare, they can be life-threatening if not quickly managed. This study evaluates the effect of a case-based bronchoscopy simulation training using real-world data on complication incidence and nature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on semi structured interviews with respiratory staff in a bronchoscopy unit a team simulation training case was constructed. It was assessed using the Kirkpatrick framework to measure changes in procedural behavior by the rate of adverse events (level three) as the main outcome. Participants' reactions, changes in stress levels, and patient perspectives (levels one, two, and four) were evaluated via questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the educational intervention, the incidence of any negative events during bronchoscopies was reduced from 62% (38/61) to 41% (26/63), p = 0.019. The most frequent event was oxygen desaturation below 90%, which occurred in 34% of the bronchoscopies before the intervention vs. 11% afterwards, p = 0.002. The participants found the simulation-based training relevant but did not change the perceived level of stress. The patient reported to be less awake (2, IQR 1-5, vs. 5, IQR 3-8), p = 0.02 after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporation of in-situ simulation-based team-training for crisis management during bronchoscopy alter procedural behavior and significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse events; therefore, it should be integrated into future bronchoscopy training curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03205-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While bronchoscopy complications are rare, they can be life-threatening if not quickly managed. This study evaluates the effect of a case-based bronchoscopy simulation training using real-world data on complication incidence and nature.

Methods: Based on semi structured interviews with respiratory staff in a bronchoscopy unit a team simulation training case was constructed. It was assessed using the Kirkpatrick framework to measure changes in procedural behavior by the rate of adverse events (level three) as the main outcome. Participants' reactions, changes in stress levels, and patient perspectives (levels one, two, and four) were evaluated via questionnaires.

Results: Following the educational intervention, the incidence of any negative events during bronchoscopies was reduced from 62% (38/61) to 41% (26/63), p = 0.019. The most frequent event was oxygen desaturation below 90%, which occurred in 34% of the bronchoscopies before the intervention vs. 11% afterwards, p = 0.002. The participants found the simulation-based training relevant but did not change the perceived level of stress. The patient reported to be less awake (2, IQR 1-5, vs. 5, IQR 3-8), p = 0.02 after the intervention.

Conclusion: Incorporation of in-situ simulation-based team-training for crisis management during bronchoscopy alter procedural behavior and significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse events; therefore, it should be integrated into future bronchoscopy training curricula.

基于现场模拟的团队训练减少了支气管镜检查期间不良事件的发生率。前瞻性教育干预队列研究。
虽然支气管镜检查并发症很少见,但如果不及时处理,可能会危及生命。本研究利用真实世界的并发症发生率和性质数据,评估了基于病例的支气管镜模拟训练的效果。方法:以半结构化访谈为基础,对支气管镜检查科室呼吸科工作人员进行团队模拟训练。使用Kirkpatrick框架以不良事件发生率(三级)作为主要结果来衡量程序性行为的变化。参与者的反应、压力水平的变化和患者的观点(第一、第二和第四级)通过问卷进行评估。结果:经教育干预后,支气管镜检查不良事件发生率由62%(38/61)降至41% (26/63),p = 0.019。最常见的事件是氧饱和度低于90%,干预前发生在34%的支气管镜检查中,干预后为11%,p = 0.002。参与者发现基于模拟的训练是相关的,但并没有改变感知到的压力水平。干预后患者报告清醒程度降低(2,IQR 1-5, vs. 5, IQR 3-8), p = 0.02。结论:在支气管镜检查过程中引入基于现场模拟的危机管理团队培训,可改变手术行为,显著减少不良事件的发生;因此,应将其纳入未来的支气管镜检查训练课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信