Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.
{"title":"Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.","authors":"Ayşegül Öztürk, Volkan Arısan, Godoberto Guevara Rojas","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional [CON], reverse helix [REX], and densification [DEN]) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability (PS), block-to-implant contact (BIC)%, peri-implant block volume (BV), and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Eighty-eight dental implants were inserted into artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes (Δ°C), insertion torque value (ITV), resonance frequency analyses (ISQ), BIC%, and BV were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DEN drilling produced the lowest Δ°C (17.52±2.57°C and 28.06±4.35°C for 2nd and 3rd drills), while CON had the highest (27.53±5.17°C and 38.03±8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) CON drilling significantly reduced Δ°C compared to clockwise (CW). DEN achieved highest PS (38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.4±5.08 N/cm), while CON CW had lowest (33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ). DEN showed the highest BV (87.71±4.23 mm³) but the lowest BIC (49.12%±2.93%). CCW CON drilling improved ITV over CW (36.21±3.63 vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEN drilling demonstrated superior performance in heat reduction, PS, and BV, but had lower BIC%. CCW running of CON drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While DEN excelled in most aspects, its lower BIC% and the positive outcomes of CCW CON drilling warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional [CON], reverse helix [REX], and densification [DEN]) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability (PS), block-to-implant contact (BIC)%, peri-implant block volume (BV), and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.
Method and materials: Eighty-eight dental implants were inserted into artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes (Δ°C), insertion torque value (ITV), resonance frequency analyses (ISQ), BIC%, and BV were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).
Results: DEN drilling produced the lowest Δ°C (17.52±2.57°C and 28.06±4.35°C for 2nd and 3rd drills), while CON had the highest (27.53±5.17°C and 38.03±8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) CON drilling significantly reduced Δ°C compared to clockwise (CW). DEN achieved highest PS (38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.4±5.08 N/cm), while CON CW had lowest (33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ). DEN showed the highest BV (87.71±4.23 mm³) but the lowest BIC (49.12%±2.93%). CCW CON drilling improved ITV over CW (36.21±3.63 vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm).
Conclusion: DEN drilling demonstrated superior performance in heat reduction, PS, and BV, but had lower BIC%. CCW running of CON drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While DEN excelled in most aspects, its lower BIC% and the positive outcomes of CCW CON drilling warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.