Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ayşegül Öztürk, Volkan Arısan, Godoberto Guevara Rojas
{"title":"Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.","authors":"Ayşegül Öztürk, Volkan Arısan, Godoberto Guevara Rojas","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional [CON], reverse helix [REX], and densification [DEN]) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability (PS), block-to-implant contact (BIC)%, peri-implant block volume (BV), and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Eighty-eight dental implants were inserted into artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes (Δ°C), insertion torque value (ITV), resonance frequency analyses (ISQ), BIC%, and BV were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DEN drilling produced the lowest Δ°C (17.52±2.57°C and 28.06±4.35°C for 2nd and 3rd drills), while CON had the highest (27.53±5.17°C and 38.03±8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) CON drilling significantly reduced Δ°C compared to clockwise (CW). DEN achieved highest PS (38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.4±5.08 N/cm), while CON CW had lowest (33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ). DEN showed the highest BV (87.71±4.23 mm³) but the lowest BIC (49.12%±2.93%). CCW CON drilling improved ITV over CW (36.21±3.63 vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEN drilling demonstrated superior performance in heat reduction, PS, and BV, but had lower BIC%. CCW running of CON drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While DEN excelled in most aspects, its lower BIC% and the positive outcomes of CCW CON drilling warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional [CON], reverse helix [REX], and densification [DEN]) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability (PS), block-to-implant contact (BIC)%, peri-implant block volume (BV), and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.

Method and materials: Eighty-eight dental implants were inserted into artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes (Δ°C), insertion torque value (ITV), resonance frequency analyses (ISQ), BIC%, and BV were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).

Results: DEN drilling produced the lowest Δ°C (17.52±2.57°C and 28.06±4.35°C for 2nd and 3rd drills), while CON had the highest (27.53±5.17°C and 38.03±8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) CON drilling significantly reduced Δ°C compared to clockwise (CW). DEN achieved highest PS (38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.4±5.08 N/cm), while CON CW had lowest (33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ). DEN showed the highest BV (87.71±4.23 mm³) but the lowest BIC (49.12%±2.93%). CCW CON drilling improved ITV over CW (36.21±3.63 vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm).

Conclusion: DEN drilling demonstrated superior performance in heat reduction, PS, and BV, but had lower BIC%. CCW running of CON drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While DEN excelled in most aspects, its lower BIC% and the positive outcomes of CCW CON drilling warrant further investigation.

植体植入截骨钻设计的热、力学和密度分析:对代表IV型骨的泡沫块的分析。
目的:分析常规[CON]、反螺旋[REX]和致密化[DEN]三种截骨钻头设计及运行方向对低密度牙槽骨模型产热、初级种植体稳定性(PS)、块体与种植体接触(BIC)%、种植体周围块体体积(BV)和抗旋脱力的影响。方法与材料:采用人工截骨术和电脑截骨术将88颗种植体植入人工骨块中。测量温度变化(Δ°C)、插入扭矩值(ITV)、共振频率分析(ISQ)、BIC%和BV。统计分析采用方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验(结果:DEN钻孔产生的最低Δ°C(第2次和第3次钻孔分别为17.52±2.57°C和28.06±4.35°C), CON最高(27.53±5.17°C和38.03±8.08°C)。与顺时针钻井(CW)相比,逆时针钻井(CCW)可显著降低Δ°C。DEN的最大扭矩(38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ)和最大扭矩(25.4±5.08 N/cm), CON CW的最小扭矩(33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ)。DEN的BV最高(87.71±4.23 mm³),BIC最低(49.12%±2.93%)。与CW相比,CCW CON钻井提高了ITV(36.21±3.63 N/cm vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm)。结论:DEN钻孔在热还原、PS和BV方面具有较好的性能,但BIC%较低。CON钻头的CCW下入在几个参数上都优于CW。虽然DEN在大多数方面都表现出色,但其较低的BIC%和CCW CON钻井的积极成果值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信