Introduction to the forum on the role of basic science in AAC access.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1080/07434618.2025.2495906

Krista M Wilkinson, Dawn J Sowers

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This introduction to the special forum on basic/foundational research in AAC offers a brief rationale for the importance of the three pillars of evidence-based practice, including scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and client/family insights, and underscores that each pillar can and should offer something and also benefit from the other pillars. It briefly overviews several areas in which basic science has been instrumental in promoting clinical advances and then introduces the articles in the current forum, which each in its own way relates to access. The hope is to promote constructive dialog between scientists, clinicians, and individuals who use AAC to move these ideas forward.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于基础科学在AAC获取中的作用论坛的介绍。

这篇关于AAC基础/基础研究特别论坛的介绍简要介绍了基于证据的实践的三个支柱的重要性，包括科学证据、临床专业知识和客户/家庭见解，并强调每个支柱都可以而且应该提供一些东西，并从其他支柱中受益。它简要概述了基础科学在促进临床进步方面发挥重要作用的几个领域，然后介绍了当前论坛上的文章，每一篇文章都以自己的方式与获取有关。希望能够促进科学家，临床医生和使用AAC的个人之间的建设性对话，以推动这些想法向前发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Augmentative and Alternative Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

15.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： As the official journal of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) publishes scientific articles related to the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) that report research concerning assessment, treatment, rehabilitation, and education of people who use or have the potential to use AAC systems; or that discuss theory, technology, and systems development relevant to AAC. The broad range of topic included in the Journal reflects the development of this field internationally. Manuscripts submitted to AAC should fall within one of the following categories, AND MUST COMPLY with associated page maximums listed on page 3 of the Manuscript Preparation Guide. Research articles (full peer review), These manuscripts report the results of original empirical research, including studies using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with both group and single-case experimental research designs (e.g, Binger et al., 2008; Petroi et al., 2014). Technical, research, and intervention notes (full peer review): These are brief manuscripts that address methodological, statistical, technical, or clinical issues or innovations that are of relevance to the AAC community and are designed to bring the research community’s attention to areas that have been minimally or poorly researched in the past (e.g., research note: Thunberg et al., 2016; intervention notes: Laubscher et al., 2019).