Using the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model assessment to enhance the implementation of electronic screening in military to Veterans Affairs programs.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Borsika A Rabin, John Gault, Laurie Lindamer, Brian Blanco, Chad M Vacco, James O E Pittman
{"title":"Using the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model assessment to enhance the implementation of electronic screening in military to Veterans Affairs programs.","authors":"Borsika A Rabin, John Gault, Laurie Lindamer, Brian Blanco, Chad M Vacco, James O E Pittman","doi":"10.1037/ser0000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) was utilized to develop an assessment for improving fit between implementation context, intervention, and implementation efforts. We present findings from the PRISM assessment used in seven military to Veterans Affairs clinics implementing eScreening to improve rate and time for the completion of mental health screenings for veterans and increasing referral to mental health treatment. Questions developed by Glasgow et al. (2020) were adapted to the study context covering the PRISM domains (six items) and reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (13 items) outcomes. Assessment results were summarized for each site graphically including comments and were presented in a discussion-based action-planning meeting. Group discussion involving implementation partners and research team members, including an external facilitator, focused on identifying ways to improve the implementation of eScreening. Participants across all sites identified areas of concern related to reach, adoption, and patient expectations. Survey data and comments on these concerns drove the team discussion and identification of implementation activities, which included (a) increasing communication of the value for veteran care, (b) standardizing minimum-effort workflows, and (c) increasing buy-in and collaboration with leadership and other facility services. In this study, the PRISM assessment was used as a one-time activity to enhance implementation across military to Veterans Affairs clinics. The assessment was feasible, and discussion yielded important data on alignment and potential adaptations of the implementation efforts within the dynamically changing local context. Recommendations are provided for those interested in applying the PRISM assessment in their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) was utilized to develop an assessment for improving fit between implementation context, intervention, and implementation efforts. We present findings from the PRISM assessment used in seven military to Veterans Affairs clinics implementing eScreening to improve rate and time for the completion of mental health screenings for veterans and increasing referral to mental health treatment. Questions developed by Glasgow et al. (2020) were adapted to the study context covering the PRISM domains (six items) and reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (13 items) outcomes. Assessment results were summarized for each site graphically including comments and were presented in a discussion-based action-planning meeting. Group discussion involving implementation partners and research team members, including an external facilitator, focused on identifying ways to improve the implementation of eScreening. Participants across all sites identified areas of concern related to reach, adoption, and patient expectations. Survey data and comments on these concerns drove the team discussion and identification of implementation activities, which included (a) increasing communication of the value for veteran care, (b) standardizing minimum-effort workflows, and (c) increasing buy-in and collaboration with leadership and other facility services. In this study, the PRISM assessment was used as a one-time activity to enhance implementation across military to Veterans Affairs clinics. The assessment was feasible, and discussion yielded important data on alignment and potential adaptations of the implementation efforts within the dynamically changing local context. Recommendations are provided for those interested in applying the PRISM assessment in their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

利用实用的、稳健的实施和可持续性模型评估来加强电子筛选在军队退伍军人事务项目中的实施。
“实用、稳健的实施和可持续性模型”(PRISM)被用于制定一项评估,以改善实施环境、干预和实施工作之间的契合度。我们介绍了PRISM评估的结果,该评估在七个军事退伍军人事务诊所实施了电子筛查,以提高退伍军人心理健康筛查的完成率和时间,并增加了心理健康治疗的转诊。格拉斯哥等人(2020)开发的问题适用于涵盖PRISM领域(六个项目)以及覆盖面、有效性、采用、实施和维护(13个项目)结果的研究背景。对每个地点的评估结果进行了图解总结,包括评论,并在以讨论为基础的行动规划会议上提出。由实施伙伴和研究小组成员(包括一名外部促进者)参与的小组讨论侧重于确定改进电子筛查实施的方法。所有站点的参与者都确定了与覆盖范围、采用和患者期望相关的关注领域。调查数据和对这些问题的评论推动了团队讨论和确定实施活动,其中包括(a)增加对退伍军人护理价值的沟通,(b)标准化最小努力的工作流程,以及(c)增加与领导和其他设施服务的支持和合作。在本研究中,PRISM评估被用作一次性活动,以加强从军队到退伍军人事务诊所的实施。评估是可行的,并且讨论产生了关于在动态变化的本地环境中实现工作的一致性和潜在适应性的重要数据。对于有兴趣在其研究中应用PRISM评估的学生,本文提供了一些建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信