"I still have not mastered that skill!" Medical student perspectives on a simulation-based evidence-based medicine competency assessment.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Joey Nicholson, Caitlin Plovnick, Juliana Magro, Cees van der Vleuten, Anique de Bruin, Adina Kalet
{"title":"\"I still have not mastered that skill!\" Medical student perspectives on a simulation-based evidence-based medicine competency assessment.","authors":"Joey Nicholson, Caitlin Plovnick, Juliana Magro, Cees van der Vleuten, Anique de Bruin, Adina Kalet","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We expect medical students to be able to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills in the context of the clinical care of patients. Previous assessments of this domain have primarily utilized decontextualized knowledge tests, which provide limited insights into students' understanding of EBM skills in the context of patient care. New performance-based EBM competence assessments using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are being developed and tested. Understanding how students experience and interact with a simulation-based assessment of EBM competence would enable us to improve the modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 13 graduating medical students from one medical school who had recently completed an immersive multi station readiness-for-residency OSCE (Night onCall) which included a case-based EBM assessment. We conducted individual interviews to explore their perceptions of participating in this OSCE as a method of EBM assessment. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using Dedoose by three health science librarians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students discussed their experience and perceptions in six main areas: connection to clinical practice, curricular timing and content coverage, feedback, station instructions, awareness of their own limitations, and an OSCE as a format for assessing EBM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical students appreciated the EBM OSCE because it enhanced their learning about how to integrate EBM into clinical practice. They proposed implementing multiple such opportunities throughout medical school because it would improve their competence and provide highly impactful opportunities to build toward EBM mastery. They endorsed that this would be well-accepted by medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"113 2","pages":"168-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We expect medical students to be able to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills in the context of the clinical care of patients. Previous assessments of this domain have primarily utilized decontextualized knowledge tests, which provide limited insights into students' understanding of EBM skills in the context of patient care. New performance-based EBM competence assessments using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are being developed and tested. Understanding how students experience and interact with a simulation-based assessment of EBM competence would enable us to improve the modality.

Methods: We recruited 13 graduating medical students from one medical school who had recently completed an immersive multi station readiness-for-residency OSCE (Night onCall) which included a case-based EBM assessment. We conducted individual interviews to explore their perceptions of participating in this OSCE as a method of EBM assessment. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using Dedoose by three health science librarians.

Results: Students discussed their experience and perceptions in six main areas: connection to clinical practice, curricular timing and content coverage, feedback, station instructions, awareness of their own limitations, and an OSCE as a format for assessing EBM.

Conclusion: Medical students appreciated the EBM OSCE because it enhanced their learning about how to integrate EBM into clinical practice. They proposed implementing multiple such opportunities throughout medical school because it would improve their competence and provide highly impactful opportunities to build toward EBM mastery. They endorsed that this would be well-accepted by medical students.

“我还没有掌握这个技能!”医学生对基于模拟的循证医学能力评估的看法。
目的:我们期望医学生能够在临床护理患者的背景下应用循证医学(EBM)技能。以前对这一领域的评估主要是利用非情境化的知识测试,这对学生在病人护理背景下对EBM技能的理解提供了有限的见解。使用客观结构化临床检查(oses)的新的基于绩效的EBM能力评估正在开发和测试中。了解学生如何体验并与基于实证医学能力的模拟评估互动,将使我们能够改进模式。方法:我们从一所医学院招募了13名即将毕业的医学生,他们最近完成了一项沉浸式多站住院准备工作OSCE(夜间值班),其中包括基于病例的EBM评估。我们进行了个别访谈,以探讨他们对参加欧安组织作为循证医学评估方法的看法。访谈由三位健康科学图书管理员转录、编码并使用Dedoose进行分析。结果:学生们在六个主要领域讨论了他们的经验和看法:与临床实践的联系、课程时间安排和内容覆盖、反馈、工作站指示、对自身局限性的认识,以及作为评估EBM格式的欧安组织。结论:医学生赞赏循证医学欧安组织,因为它加强了他们对如何将循证医学融入临床实践的学习。他们建议在整个医学院实施多个这样的机会,因为这将提高他们的能力,并为掌握循证医学提供极具影响力的机会。他们认为这将被医科学生广泛接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信