Death talk and access gaps: applying a personalist lens to address inequities for children with complex conditions at the end of life.

IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS
Christina M Lamb, Karen Cook
{"title":"Death talk and access gaps: applying a personalist lens to address inequities for children with complex conditions at the end of life.","authors":"Christina M Lamb, Karen Cook","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00246-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with complex care needs lack access to Specialized Pediatric Palliative care in Canada. At the same time, death is increasingly being handled in a mechanized and specialized manner, with hospitals becoming the expected place for death to occur. Although this is true for some children, the meaning of dying and death is obscured for dying children in Canadian healthcare. Specifically, discussions about dying and death, what they are and what they mean to children are relatively absent in Canadian healthcare contexts. This lack of death talk is a problem for children with medically complex conditions and their families since death is a part of living, and palliative care is essential for children who are living and dying with medical complexity. To address the health disparity that these children face concerning access to pediatric palliative care and having honest conversations about death, it is essential to attend to the bioethics and care frameworks undergirding pediatric healthcare to understand how the meaning of living, dying and death is being valued for this population. Subsequently, in this paper, we will explore a personalist bioethics approach to mitigate these end-of-life disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00246-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children with complex care needs lack access to Specialized Pediatric Palliative care in Canada. At the same time, death is increasingly being handled in a mechanized and specialized manner, with hospitals becoming the expected place for death to occur. Although this is true for some children, the meaning of dying and death is obscured for dying children in Canadian healthcare. Specifically, discussions about dying and death, what they are and what they mean to children are relatively absent in Canadian healthcare contexts. This lack of death talk is a problem for children with medically complex conditions and their families since death is a part of living, and palliative care is essential for children who are living and dying with medical complexity. To address the health disparity that these children face concerning access to pediatric palliative care and having honest conversations about death, it is essential to attend to the bioethics and care frameworks undergirding pediatric healthcare to understand how the meaning of living, dying and death is being valued for this population. Subsequently, in this paper, we will explore a personalist bioethics approach to mitigate these end-of-life disparities.

死亡谈话和获取差距:运用个人视角解决生命末期患有复杂疾病的儿童的不平等问题。
在加拿大,有复杂护理需求的儿童缺乏获得专业儿科姑息治疗的机会。与此同时,死亡越来越以机械化和专业化的方式处理,医院成为死亡发生的预期场所。虽然这对一些孩子来说是真的,但在加拿大的医疗保健中,死亡和死亡的意义对垂死的孩子来说是模糊不清的。具体来说,在加拿大的医疗环境中,关于死亡和死亡的讨论,它们是什么以及它们对儿童的意义相对较少。对于患有复杂医学病症的儿童及其家人来说,缺乏死亡谈话是一个问题,因为死亡是生活的一部分,而姑息治疗对于患有复杂医学病症的儿童和即将死亡的儿童至关重要。为了解决这些儿童在获得儿科姑息治疗和就死亡进行诚实对话方面面临的健康差距,必须关注儿科医疗保健基础的生物伦理学和护理框架,以了解这一人群如何重视生存、死亡和死亡的意义。随后,在本文中,我们将探索一种个人生命伦理学方法来减轻这些临终差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world. An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre. Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length. Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信