{"title":"Death talk and access gaps: applying a personalist lens to address inequities for children with complex conditions at the end of life.","authors":"Christina M Lamb, Karen Cook","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00246-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with complex care needs lack access to Specialized Pediatric Palliative care in Canada. At the same time, death is increasingly being handled in a mechanized and specialized manner, with hospitals becoming the expected place for death to occur. Although this is true for some children, the meaning of dying and death is obscured for dying children in Canadian healthcare. Specifically, discussions about dying and death, what they are and what they mean to children are relatively absent in Canadian healthcare contexts. This lack of death talk is a problem for children with medically complex conditions and their families since death is a part of living, and palliative care is essential for children who are living and dying with medical complexity. To address the health disparity that these children face concerning access to pediatric palliative care and having honest conversations about death, it is essential to attend to the bioethics and care frameworks undergirding pediatric healthcare to understand how the meaning of living, dying and death is being valued for this population. Subsequently, in this paper, we will explore a personalist bioethics approach to mitigate these end-of-life disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00246-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children with complex care needs lack access to Specialized Pediatric Palliative care in Canada. At the same time, death is increasingly being handled in a mechanized and specialized manner, with hospitals becoming the expected place for death to occur. Although this is true for some children, the meaning of dying and death is obscured for dying children in Canadian healthcare. Specifically, discussions about dying and death, what they are and what they mean to children are relatively absent in Canadian healthcare contexts. This lack of death talk is a problem for children with medically complex conditions and their families since death is a part of living, and palliative care is essential for children who are living and dying with medical complexity. To address the health disparity that these children face concerning access to pediatric palliative care and having honest conversations about death, it is essential to attend to the bioethics and care frameworks undergirding pediatric healthcare to understand how the meaning of living, dying and death is being valued for this population. Subsequently, in this paper, we will explore a personalist bioethics approach to mitigate these end-of-life disparities.
期刊介绍:
Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world.
An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance.
Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications.
One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre.
Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length.
Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary