The impact of nasal cavity anatomical abnormalities on the success of Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy (LDCR).

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Radosław Różycki, Katarzyna Kieruzal, Lukasz Skrzypiec
{"title":"The impact of nasal cavity anatomical abnormalities on the success of Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy (LDCR).","authors":"Radosław Różycki, Katarzyna Kieruzal, Lukasz Skrzypiec","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0055.0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The minimally invasive procedure of Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy (LDCR) has gained importance in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction, offering a potential alternative to traditional external and endonasal methods. This is an important topic in otolaryngology practice, as it offers an alternative to traditional endoscopic surgery. Due to the close anatomical proximity of the nose and the eye, addressing it requires collaboration within a multidisciplinary team. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; This study aims to evaluate the surgical effectiveness and factors influencing clinical outcomes. Anatomical issues such as nasal septum deviation and the size of the created ostium were assessed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Materials and methods:&lt;/b&gt; A total of 42 patients were included in the study, undergoing surgery on 46 nasolacrimal ducts. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at least 6 months post-surgery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Anatomic and functional success was achieved in 93.48% of the patients. In patients without septal deviation, there were 35 successful outcomes and 2 failures, compared to 18 successes and 1 failure in the group with septal deviation. The findings revealed no significant correlation between septal deviation and surgical success, indicating that other factors may be more influential. Patients with an average-sized ostium reported better clinical outcomes and fewer tearing symptoms, while those with a deviated septum experienced more intermittent tearing. The overall mean ostium width was 2.37 mm. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; LDCR proved effective with a significantly shorter surgical time, benefiting patients seeking a quick recovery. While factors like anatomical abnormalities and septal deviation were not statistically significant for surgical success, patients with anatomical disorders often reported slightly poorer functional outcomes. Analyzing etiological factors and ostium development will help refine surgical techniques and improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"79 3","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The minimally invasive procedure of Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy (LDCR) has gained importance in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction, offering a potential alternative to traditional external and endonasal methods. This is an important topic in otolaryngology practice, as it offers an alternative to traditional endoscopic surgery. Due to the close anatomical proximity of the nose and the eye, addressing it requires collaboration within a multidisciplinary team. <br><br><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to evaluate the surgical effectiveness and factors influencing clinical outcomes. Anatomical issues such as nasal septum deviation and the size of the created ostium were assessed. <br><br><b>Materials and methods:</b> A total of 42 patients were included in the study, undergoing surgery on 46 nasolacrimal ducts. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at least 6 months post-surgery. <br><br><b>Results:</b> Anatomic and functional success was achieved in 93.48% of the patients. In patients without septal deviation, there were 35 successful outcomes and 2 failures, compared to 18 successes and 1 failure in the group with septal deviation. The findings revealed no significant correlation between septal deviation and surgical success, indicating that other factors may be more influential. Patients with an average-sized ostium reported better clinical outcomes and fewer tearing symptoms, while those with a deviated septum experienced more intermittent tearing. The overall mean ostium width was 2.37 mm. <br><br><b>Conclusions:</b> LDCR proved effective with a significantly shorter surgical time, benefiting patients seeking a quick recovery. While factors like anatomical abnormalities and septal deviation were not statistically significant for surgical success, patients with anatomical disorders often reported slightly poorer functional outcomes. Analyzing etiological factors and ostium development will help refine surgical techniques and improve patient satisfaction.

鼻腔解剖异常对激光辅助泪囊鼻腔造口术成功的影响。
& lt; b>介绍:& lt; / b>激光辅助泪囊鼻腔造瘘术(LDCR)的微创治疗在鼻泪管阻塞的治疗中越来越重要,为传统的鼻外和鼻内方法提供了一种潜在的选择。这是耳鼻喉科实践中的一个重要课题,因为它提供了传统内窥镜手术的替代方案。由于鼻子和眼睛在解剖学上的接近,解决它需要多学科团队的合作。& lt; br> & lt; br> & lt; b>目的:& lt; / b>本研究旨在评价手术效果及影响临床结果的因素。解剖问题,如鼻中隔偏曲和造口的大小进行评估。<br><br>< <;研究共纳入42例患者,对46例鼻泪管进行手术。术后至少6个月进行随访评估。& lt; br> & lt; br> & lt; b>结果:& lt; / b>93.48%的患者解剖和功能成功。在没有间隔偏曲的患者中,有35例成功,2例失败,而有间隔偏曲的患者中有18例成功,1例失败。研究结果显示,室间隔偏曲与手术成功之间没有明显的相关性,表明其他因素可能更有影响。具有中等大小的口的患者报告了更好的临床结果和较少的撕裂症状,而那些具有偏隔的患者则经历了更多的间歇性撕裂。整体平均口宽为2.37 mm。<br><br><b>;结论:<;/b>;LDCR被证明是有效的,手术时间明显缩短,有利于寻求快速恢复的患者。虽然解剖异常和间隔偏曲等因素对手术成功没有统计学意义,但解剖障碍患者通常报告的功能预后略差。分析病因和造口发育有助于改进手术技术,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信